Jaxun v. Asarco, LLC (ALJ decision, November 21, 2007)
Jaxun v. Asarco, LLC (FMSHRC WEST 2007-811-DM): Reassignment and stay denied, complaint materials ordered
Apply this to your situation
This order from 2007 bound only the parties to this case; it isn't precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
Vurnun Edwurd Jaxun asked to have his discrimination case reassigned and to stay the assignment order. Chief Administrative Law Judge Robert J. Lesnick denied both requests and directed the case to proceed. He ordered Jaxun to file the original MSHA complaint, proof that the mine operator received it, a statement of requested relief, and MSHA's no-discrimination letter within 30 days. The amended order restarted that deadline from November 21, 2007.
Decision snapshot
- Cited authority: No specific Mine Act or procedural-rule section was identified.
- Outcome: Reassignment and a stay were denied, and Jaxun was ordered to supply four categories of complaint materials within 30 days.
- Key point: A new discrimination case cannot proceed without the underlying complaint, service proof, requested relief, and MSHA determination letter.
Full text (FMSHRC public release)
FMSRHC ALJ DECISION
FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION
OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGES
601 NEW JERSEY AVENUE, N.W., SUITE 9500
WASHINGTON, DC 20001-2021
TELEPHONE: 202-434-9958 / FAX: 202-434-9949
November 21, 2007
VURNUN EDWURD JAXUN,
Complaintant
v.
ASARCO, LLC
Respondent
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
DISCRIMINATION PROCEEDING
Docket No. WEST 2007-811-DM
RM MD 2006-06
San Mission Mine
Mine ID 02-00135
AMENDED
ORDER DENYING REQUEST FOR REASSIGNMENT
ORDER DENYING STAY OF ASSIGNMENT ORDER
ORDER TO FILE COMPLAINT
My November 8, 2007 order is amended as follows (amended language is in bold italics):
Jaxun’s request for reassignment is DENIED, and, as Jaxun has provided no basis for a
stay, the request for stay of the Order of Assignment is also DENIED. This case will proceed
pursuant to the Mine Act and the Commission’s Procedural Rules.
In addition, as Docket No. WEST 2007-811-DM is a new case before the Commission,
Jaxun is ORDERED to submit the following within 30 days of the date of this order:
1. A copy of the original complaint to the Mine
Safety and Health Administration (MSHA).
2. A copy of the return receipt (green card) from
delivery of the complaint to the mine operator.
If he has not done so already, Jaxun must send the
complaint to the operator by certified mail, return
receipt requested. A note to the operator should be
enclosed indicating Jaxun’s disagreement with MSHA's
determination and stating that he is requesting the
Commission’s review of the case.
3. A statement of the relief sought, such as
4. A copy of the letter from MSHA stating that its
investigation determined that a discrimination did
not occur.
Jaxun’s 30-day time period begins from the date of this order rather than the date of the
November 8 order.
Robert J. Lesnick
Chief Administrative Law Judge
Distribution:
Hugh Thatcher, Esq., Patton Boggs, LLP, 1801 California Street, Suite 4900, Denver, CO 80202
Vurnun Edwurd Jaxun, 5357 N. Fort Yuma Trail, Tucson, AZ 85750-5030
/mvw
What applies to your situation today?
This order bound one employer. Ezel checks the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent against your facts, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace