State of Alaska Department of Transportation and Public Facilities (Commission decision, June 22, 2007)

State of Alaska Department of Transportation and Public Facilities (FMSHRC WEST 2007-512-M): Timely penalty contest returned for proceedings

Decision type
Commission decision
Docket
WEST 2007-512-M
Decided
June 22, 2007
Outcome
Remanded
Precedential status
Citable Commission precedent
Checked against source
2026-08-09

Apply this precedent to your situation

This is citable Commission precedent from 2007, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.

Currency note: this decision dates from 2007
The MSHA standards may have been amended, penalty amounts have been adjusted, and later Commission or court decisions may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current compliance advice. Verify the current standard before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or penalty mentioned here.
Decision of the Commission
This is a decision of the Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission, the highest level of agency review, citable as Commission precedent. It may have been appealed to a U.S. Court of Appeals after issuance under 30 U.S.C. § 816; check subsequent history before relying on it. The full text below is from the official FMSHRC release.
About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official FMSHRC release. The full text is the agency's own release.
Read the official release (fmshrc.gov)

Plain-English summary

The Alaska Department of Transportation and Public Facilities asked the Commission to reopen a proposed penalty after learning that a collection agency was seeking payment. The agency showed that it had filed a timely notice of contest shortly after MSHA issued the assessment, and the Secretary agreed. The Commission held that the assessment therefore never became a final Commission order. It denied the reopening motion as moot and remanded the case to the chief administrative law judge for appropriate proceedings on the timely contest.

Decision snapshot

  • Governing provision: 30 U.S.C. § 815(a)
  • Outcome: The reopening motion was denied as moot, and the timely contested assessment was remanded for further proceedings.
  • Key point: A timely penalty contest prevents an assessment from becoming final, even if the assessment is later sent for collection.

Full text (FMSHRC public release)

Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission

FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION

601 NEW JERSEY AVENUE, NW

SUITE 9500

WASHINGTON, DC 20001

June 22, 2007

SECRETARY OF LABOR,

MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH

ADMINISTRATION (MSHA)

v.

STATE OF ALASKA DEPARTMENT OF

TRANSPORTATION AND PUBLIC

FACILITIES

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

Docket No. WEST 2007-512-M
A.C. No. 50-01803-74414

BEFORE: Duffy, Chairman; Jordan and Young, Commissioners

ORDER

BY THE COMMISSION:

This matter arises under the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977, 30 U.S.C.
§ 801 et seq. (2000) (“Mine Act”). On May 29, 2007, the Commission received from counsel for the Alaska Department of Transportation and Public Facilities (“ADOT&PF”) a letter requesting reconsideration of the response by the Department of Labor’s Mine Safety and Health Administration (“MSHA”) to ADOT&PF’s request that it be granted a hearing on a penalty assessment that had been issued to ADOT&PF. We construe the letter as a motion to reopen the assessment, which ADOT&PF believes had become a final order of the Commission pursuant to section 105(a) of the Mine Act, 30 U.S.C. § 815(a).

Under section 105(a) of the Mine Act, an operator who wishes to contest a proposed penalty must notify the Secretary of Labor no later than 30 days after receiving the proposed penalty assessment. If the operator fails to notify the Secretary, the proposed penalty assessment is deemed a final order of the Commission. 30 U.S.C. § 815(a).

On December 7, 2005, MSHA issued proposed penalty assessment No. 000074414 to ADOT&PF. On December 26, 2005, ADOT&PF filed a timely notice of contest. According to ADOT&PF, it heard nothing further on the matter until it realized that the proposed penalty was included among several penalties that a collection agency was seeking to collect from ADOT&PF on behalf of MSHA. The Secretary states that she does not oppose reopening, and concedes that ADOT&PF filed a timely notice of contest.

Having reviewed ADOT&PF’s motion and the Secretary’s response, we conclude that the proposed assessment at issue has not become a final order of the Commission because ADOT&PF timely contested it. We deny ADOT&PF’s motion as moot and remand this matter to the Chief Administrative Law Judge for further proceedings as appropriate pursuant to the Mine Act and the Commission’s Procedural Rules, 29 C.F.R. Part 2700. See Lehigh Cement Co., 28 FMSHRC 440, 441 (July 2006).

______

Michael F. Duffy, Chairman

______

Mary Lu Jordan, Commissioner

______

Michael G. Young, Commissioner

Distribution

Joan M. Wilson, Asst. Attorney General

State of Alaska

1031 West 4th Avenue, Suite 200

Anchorage, AK 99501-5903

W. Christian Schumann, Esq.

Office of the Solicitor 

U.S. Department of Labor

1100 Wilson Blvd., Room 2220

Arlington, VA 22209-2296

Chief Administrative Law Judge Robert J. Lesnick

Federal Mine Safety & Health Review Commission

601 New Jersey Avenue, N.W., Suite 9500

Washington, D.C. 20001-2021

Does this precedent still control your case?

Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and applies it to your situation with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace