James Carney Construction (Commission decision, April 18, 2005)
James Carney Construction (FMSHRC WEST 2005-51-M): Default order vacated for notice review
Apply this precedent to your situation
This is citable Commission precedent from 2005, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.
Plain-English summary
James Carney Construction was in a civil penalty proceeding after failing to answer the Secretary of Labor's penalty petition. The Chief ALJ entered a default order, and the company's owner later said he had not received the show cause order. The Commission treated his letter as a timely petition for discretionary review, vacated the default order, and remanded the case for a determination of whether good cause excused the missed response. The Secretary did not oppose review.
Decision snapshot
- Cited authority: 30 U.S.C. § 823(d)(2); 29 C.F.R. §§ 2700.69(b), 2700.70(a)
- Outcome: The default order was vacated and the matter was remanded for a good-cause determination.
- Key point: When the record does not show whether a party received the show cause order, the Commission may reopen the case for a notice and good-cause inquiry.
Full text (FMSHRC public release)
FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION
601 New Jersey Avenue, NW,
Suite 9500
Washington, DC 20001
April 18, 2005
SECRETARY OF LABOR,
:
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH :
ADMINISTRATION (MSHA)
:
:
v. : Docket No. WEST 2005-51-M
:
JAMES CARNEY CONSTRUCTION :
:
BEFORE: Duffy, Chairman; Jordan, Suboleski, and Young, Commissioners
DIRECTION FOR REVIEW AND ORDER
BY THE COMMISSION:
This civil penalty proceeding arises under the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977, 30 U.S.C. § 801 et seq. (2000) ("Mine Act"). On January 28, 2005, Chief Administrative Law Judge Robert Lesnick issued to James Carney Construction ("Carney") an Order to Show Cause for failing to answer the Secretary of Labor's petition for assessment of penalty. On March 21, 2005, Chief Judge Lesnick issued an Order of Default dismissing this civil penalty proceeding for failure to respond to the show cause order.
On March 28, 2005, the Commission received a handwritten correspondence from Carney's owner, Jim Carney, which we construe to be a timely petition for discretionary review. In that petition, Jim Carney states that he did not receive the show cause order and that he opposes the citation on the merits. Letter at 1. The Secretary does not oppose the petition for review and states that the case should be remanded to the judge so that the parties can litigate whether there was a violation.
The judge's jurisdiction over this case terminated when he issued his decision on March 21, 2005. 29 C.F.R. § 2700.69(b). Relief from a judge's decision may be sought by filing a petition for discretionary review within 30 days of its issuance. 30 U.S.C. § 823(d)(2); 29 C.F.R.
§ 2700.70(a). We deem Carney's correspondence to be a timely filed petition for review, which we grant. See, e.g., Middle States Res., Inc., 10 FMSHRC 1130 (Sept. 1988).
In evaluating requests to reopen final orders, the Commission has found guidance in Rule 60(b) in the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure under which, for example, a party could be entitled to relief from a final order of the Commission on the basis of inadvertence or mistake. See 29 C.F.R. § 2700.1(b) ("the Commission and its Judges shall be guided so far as practicable by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure"); Highlands Mining & Processing Co., 24 FMSHRC 685, 686 (July 2002). We have also observed that default is a harsh remedy and that, if the defaulting party can make a showing of good cause for a failure to timely respond, the case may be reopened and appropriate proceedings on the merits permitted. See Coal Prep. Servs., Inc., 17 FMSHRC 1529, 1530 (Sept. 1995).
Based on the present record, it is not clear whether Carney received the show cause order.
In the interest of justice, we vacate the judge's March 21 order and remand this matter to the Chief Administrative Law Judge for a determination of whether good cause exists for Carney's failure to timely respond to the judge's show cause order, and for further proceedings as appropriate. See RBS, Inc., 26 FMSHRC 751 (Sept. 2004).
______
Michael F. Duffy, Chairman
______
Mary Lu Jordan, Commissioner
______
Stanley C. Suboleski, Commissioner
______
Michael G. Young, Commissioner
Distribution:
James Carney, Owner
James Carney Construction
P.O. Box 928
Glasgow, MT 59230
W. Christian Schumann, Esq.
Office of the Solicitor
U.S. Department of Labor
1100 Wilson Blvd., 22nd Floor
Arlington, VA 22209
Chief Administrative Law Judge Robert J. Lesnick
Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission
601 New Jersey Avenue, Suite 9500
Washington, D.C. 20001
Does this precedent still control your case?
Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and applies it to your situation with citations.
Try Ezel Pro free for 7 days. Cancel anytime before the trial ends and you pay nothing.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace