FMSHRC Commission decision Docket WEST 2000-480-R, WEST 2002-131 Decided November 10, 2005 Modified

Secretary of Labor v. Twentymile Coal Company

Secretary of Labor v. Twentymile Coal Company (FMSHRC WEST 2000-480-R, WEST 2002-131): $1,500 penalty reinstated after appellate remand

Apply this precedent to your situation

This is citable Commission precedent from 2005, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.

Currency note: this decision dates from 2005
The MSHA standards may have been amended, penalty amounts have been adjusted, and later Commission or court decisions may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current compliance advice. Verify the current standard before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or penalty mentioned here.
Decision of the Commission
This is a decision of the Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission, the highest level of agency review, citable as Commission precedent. It may have been appealed to a U.S. Court of Appeals after issuance under 30 U.S.C. § 816; check subsequent history before relying on it. The full text below is from the official FMSHRC release.
About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official FMSHRC release. The full text is the agency's own release.
Read the official release (fmshrc.gov)

Plain-English summary

MSHA issued Twentymile Coal Company an order for violating the mandatory training standard in 30 C.F.R. § 48.7(c). The Commission had previously affirmed the violation but set aside the proposed penalty. The D.C. Circuit affirmed the violation ruling, vacated the penalty ruling, and remanded the case to the Commission. The Commission reinstated the $1,500 penalty originally assessed by the judge.

Decision snapshot

  • Cited standard: 30 C.F.R. § 48.7(c)
  • Outcome: The violation ruling remained affirmed and the original $1,500 civil penalty was reinstated.
  • Key point: After the appellate court's remand, the Commission reinstated the penalty originally assessed by the ALJ.

Full text (FMSHRC public release)

TWENTYMILE COAL COMPANY -- November 10, 2005

FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION

601 New Jersey Avenue, NW,

Suite 9500

Washington, DC 20001

November 10, 2005

SECRETARY OF LABOR,

MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH

ADMINISTRATION (MSHA)

v.

TWENTYMILE COAL COMPANY

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

Docket Nos.
WEST 2000-480-R

WEST 2002-131

BEFORE: Duffy, Chairman; Jordan, Suboleski, and Young, Commissioners

ORDER

BY THE COMMISSION:

This consolidated contest and civil penalty proceeding arising under the Federal Mine
Safety and Health Act of 1977, 30 U.S.C. � 801 et seq. (2000), involves an order issued to
Twentymile Coal Company ("Twentymile") by the Department of Labor's Mine Safety and
Health Administration as a result of a violation of the mandatory training standard at 30 C.F.R.
� 48.7(c).

Following a decision by the Commission (26 FMSHRC 666 (Aug. 2004)), both the
Secretary of Labor and Twentymile petitioned for court review of the Commission's decision. In
Secretary of Labor v. Twentymile Coal Co., 411 F.3d 256 (D.C. Cir. 2005), the District of
Columbia Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the Commission on the question of violation but
vacated the Commission's order setting aside the Secretary's proposed penalty.

In vacating the Commission's decision on the penalty issue the court remanded the matter
to the Commission for proceedings not inconsistent with the instructions contained within
the court's opinion. Id. at 262. Accordingly, the Commission reinstates the $1,500 penalty
originally assessed by the judge.


Michael F. Duffy, Chairman


Mary Lu Jordan, Commissioner


Stanley C. Suboleski, Commissioner


Michael G. Young, Commissioner

Distribution:

Jerold S. Feingold, Esq.

Office of the Solicitor

U.S. Department of Labor

1100 Wilson Blvd., 22nd Floor

Arlington, VA 22209

Administrative Law Judge David F. Barbour

Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission

601 New Jersey Avenue, N.W., Suite 9500

Washington, D.C. 20001

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read Commission precedent from 2005. Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.