United States Department of Defense, Pentagon Force Protection Agency (Agency) and American Federation of Government Employees, AFL-CIO (Labor Organization/Petitioner) (Authority decision, January 28, 2015)

Pentagon Force Protection Agency and AFGE (FLRA WA-RP-12-0005): Authority takes no further action on review request

Decision type
Authority decision
Docket
WA-RP-12-0005
Decided
January 28, 2015
Outcome
Procedural
Precedential status
Citable Authority precedent
Checked against source
2026-09-23

Apply this precedent to your situation

This is citable Authority precedent from 2015, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.

Currency note: this decision dates from 2015
The federal labor-relations law may have been amended, and later Authority or court decisions may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule mentioned here.
About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official FLRA release. The full text is the agency's own release.
Read the official release (flra.gov)

Final FLRA representation decision. This notice states that a regional director's decision and order became the Authority's action under 5 U.S.C. § 7105(f) and that the Authority will take no further action on this review request. The notice does not itself certify an election result. It does not present a judicial-review period as running from this notice; an order involving an appropriate-unit determination under 5 U.S.C. § 7112 falls within the review exclusion in 5 U.S.C. § 7123(a)(2).

Plain-English summary

An application for Authority review was filed in a representation case involving the Pentagon Force Protection Agency and AFGE while the Authority lacked a quorum. The Authority later regained a quorum but did not undertake to grant review within the statutory 60-day period. It concluded that the regional director's decision and order had therefore become the Authority's action. The Authority notified the parties that it would take no further action on the application. This short notice does not explain the regional director's underlying ruling.

Decision snapshot

  • Authority: 5 U.S.C. § 7105(f); 5 U.S.C. § 7123(a)(2)
  • Outcome: No further Authority action on the application for review; the regional director's order became the Authority's action.
  • Key point: The Authority's failure to undertake review within 60 days of regaining a quorum left the regional director's order in place.

Full text (FLRA public release)

68 FLRA No. 42

UNITED STATES

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
PENTAGON FORCE PROTECTION AGENCY
(Agency)

and

AMERICAN FEDERATION

OF GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES

AFL-CIO
(Labor Organization/Petitioner)

WA-RP-12-0005

_____

NOTICE

January 28, 2015

______

Before the Authority: Carol Waller Pope, Chairman, and

Ernest DuBester and Patrick Pizzella, Members

In FDIC,[1] the Authority held that, under § 7105(f) of the Federal Service Labor-Management Relations Statute,[2] the Authority had sixty days from the date on which it regained its quorum – November 12, 2013 – to undertake to grant an application for review that had been filed while the Authority lacked a quorum.[3] The Authority further held that, because it had not undertaken to grant review within that sixty-day period, the regional director’s decision and order in that case became “the action of the Authority” after January 11, 2014.[4]

The application for review in this case also was filed when the Authority lacked a quorum. For the same reasons set forth in FDIC, because the Authority did not undertake to grant review of the application by January 11, 2014, the Regional Director’s decision and order in this case became the action of the Authority after that date. Accordingly, consistent with FDIC, we hereby notify the parties that the Authority is taking no further action in this case.

[1] 68 FLRA 260 (2015).

[2] 5 U.S.C. § 7105(f).

[3] FDIC, 68 FLRA at 260.

[4] Id. at 262 (internal quotation marks omitted).

Does this precedent still control your case?

Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and applies it to your situation with citations.

Try Ezel Pro free for 7 days. Cancel anytime before the trial ends and you pay nothing.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace