United States Department of Agriculture, U.S. Forest Service (Agency) and National Federation of Federal Employees, International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers, AFL-CIO (Labor Organization/Petitioner) (Authority decision, January 28, 2015)
Forest Service and NFFE (FLRA WA-RP-11-0055): Regional decision becomes Authority action
Apply this precedent to your situation
This is citable Authority precedent from 2015, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.
FLRA representation decision. The Regional Director's decision and order became the action of the Authority under 5 U.S.C. § 7105(f) after the Authority did not undertake to grant review within sixty days of regaining a quorum. This notice states that the Authority will take no further action in this case.
Plain-English summary
A request to review a Regional Director's representation decision was filed while the Authority lacked a quorum. The Authority regained a quorum on November 12, 2013, but did not undertake to grant review within the following sixty days. Under the statutory rule applied in this notice, the Regional Director's decision and order became the Authority's action after January 11, 2014. The Authority notified the Forest Service and the union that it would take no further action. The notice does not describe the underlying representation ruling.
Decision snapshot
- Authority: 5 U.S.C. § 7105(f)
- Outcome: The Regional Director's decision and order became the Authority's action; the Authority took no further action.
- Key point: When the Authority did not undertake to grant review within the sixty-day period after regaining a quorum, the regional decision became its action.
Full text (FLRA public release)
68 FLRA No. 43
UNITED STATES
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
U.S. FOREST SERVICE
(Agency)
and
NATIONAL FEDERATION
OF FEDERAL EMPLOYEES
INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION
OF MACHINISTS
AND AEROSPACE WORKERS, AFL-CIO
(Labor Organization/Petitioner)
WA-RP-11-0055
_____
NOTICE
January 28, 2015
______
Before the Authority: Carol Waller Pope, Chairman, and
Ernest DuBester and Patrick Pizzella, Members
In FDIC,[1] the Authority held that, under § 7105(f) of the Federal Service Labor-Management Relations Statute,[2] the Authority had sixty days from the date on which it regained its quorum – November 12, 2013 – to undertake to grant an application for review that had been filed while the Authority lacked a quorum.[3] The Authority further held that, because it had not undertaken to grant review within that sixty-day period, the regional director’s decision and order in that case became “the action of the Authority” after January 11, 2014.[4]
The application for review in this case also was filed when the Authority lacked a quorum. For the same reasons set forth in FDIC, because the Authority did not undertake to grant review of the application by January 11, 2014, the Regional Director’s decision and order in this case became the action of the Authority after that date. Accordingly, consistent with FDIC, we hereby notify the parties that the Authority is taking no further action in this case.
[1] 68 FLRA 260 (2015).
[2] 5 U.S.C. § 7105(f).
[3] FDIC, 68 FLRA at 260.
[4] Id. at 262 (internal quotation marks omitted).
Does this precedent still control your case?
Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and applies it to your situation with citations.
Try Ezel Pro free for 7 days. Cancel anytime before the trial ends and you pay nothing.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace