Secretary of Labor (MSHA) v. Halquist Stone Company, Inc. (Commission decision, July 6, 1981)

Secretary of Labor (MSHA) v. Halquist Stone Company, Inc. (FMSHRC VINC 79-118-PM): Inspection refusal and $700 penalty affirmed

Decision type
Commission decision
Docket
VINC 79-118-PM
Decided
July 6, 1981
Outcome
Citations affirmed
Precedential status
Citable Commission precedent
Checked against source
2026-10-22

Apply this precedent to your situation

This is citable Commission precedent from 1981, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.

Currency note: this decision dates from 1981
The MSHA standards may have been amended, penalty amounts have been adjusted, and later Commission or court decisions may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current compliance advice. Verify the current standard before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or penalty mentioned here.
Decision of the Commission
This final decision affirmed the judge's violation finding and $700 penalty. The full text below is from the official FMSHRC release.
About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official FMSHRC release. The full text is the agency's own release.
Read the official release (fmshrc.gov)

Plain-English summary

Halquist Stone challenged a judge's finding that it prevented an MSHA inspector from continuing an inspection. The Commission said its decision in Waukesha Lime and Stone Company, issued the same day, resolved the legal question in the Secretary's favor. It also rejected Halquist's claim that it had not stopped the inspection because substantial evidence supported the judge's finding. The Commission affirmed the violation and the $700 penalty.

Decision snapshot

  • Governing provision: Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977; the decision applies the Commission's Waukesha ruling on inspection refusal.
  • Outcome: Violation finding and $700 penalty affirmed.
  • Key point: Substantial evidence supported the finding that Halquist prevented the inspector from continuing his inspection.

Full text (FMSHRC public release)

CCASE:
MSHA V. HALQUIST STONE
DDATE:
19810706
TTEXT:
FEDERAL MINE SAFETY & HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. July 6, 1981 SECRETARY OF LABOR, MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION (MSHA)

v. Docket No. VINC 79-118-PM

HALQUIST STONE COMPANY, INC.

DECISION
This case arises under the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977, 30 U.S.C. $801 et seq. (Supp. III 1979), and raises the same legal questions that were before us in Waukesha Lime and Stone Company. Inc., Docket No. 79-66-PM (July 6, 1981 ). Our decision in Waukesha resolves this question in the Secretary's favor. Accordingly, we affirm the judge's finding of a violation and his assessment of a $700 penalty. 1/ We reject Halquist's assertion that it did not prevent the inspector from continuing his inspection. Substantial evidence supports the judge's contrary finding.
~1701
Distribution
Michael A. McCord, Esq.
U.S. Department of Labor
Office of the Solicitor
4015 Wilson Boulevard
Arlington, VA 22203
Paul Binzak, Esq.
Kraemer and Binzak, S.C.
16800 Appleton Avenue
Menomenee Falls, Wisconsin 53051
ALJ James A. Broderick
Chief Administrative Law Judge
FMSHRC
1730 K Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20006

Does this precedent still control your case?

Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and applies it to your situation with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace