Danny Owens, employed by J & T Coal Incorporated (ALJ decision, July 20, 1993)

Danny Owens, employed by J & T Coal Incorporated (FMSHRC VA 93-3): Six-violation settlement approved for $1,200

Decision type
ALJ decision
Docket
VA 93-3
Decided
July 20, 1993
Presiding judge
Outcome
Settled
Precedential status
Final order, not precedent
Checked against source
2026-08-14

Apply this to your situation

This order from 1993 bound only the parties to this case; it isn't precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent say, with citations.

Currency note: this decision dates from 1993
The MSHA standards may have been amended, penalty amounts have been adjusted, and later Commission or court decisions may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current compliance advice. Verify the current standard before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or penalty mentioned here.
Final ALJ decision, not Commission precedent
This decision became final under the 40-day rule in 30 U.S.C. § 823(d)(1) because no later Commission review appears in the official index. It binds the parties but is not Commission precedent. The full text below is from the official FMSHRC release.
About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official FMSHRC release. The full text is the agency's own release.
Read the official release (fmshrc.gov)

Plain-English summary

Danny Owens, an agent of J & T Coal Incorporated, was charged under section 110(c) of the Mine Act with knowingly authorizing, ordering, or carrying out actions resulting in six alleged mandatory-standard violations. Owens stipulated to the violations and agreed to a settlement after presenting evidence about his income, assets, and family-support obligations. Judge Jerold Feldman approved the settlement as in the public interest, reduced the proposed $2,400 penalty to $1,200, and ordered payment in installments.

Decision snapshot

  • Governing provision: Section 110(c) of the Mine Act, 30 U.S.C. § 820(c)
  • Outcome: The six-violation settlement was approved, with a $1,200 penalty payable in installments.
  • Key point: The judge approved a reduced individual penalty after considering the respondent's stipulation and ability to pay.

Full text (FMSHRC public release)

FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION

OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGES
2 SKYLINE, 10th FLOOR
5203 LEESBURG PIKE
FALLS CHURCH, VIRGINIA 22041

SECRETARY OF LABOR,
: CIVIL PENALTY PROCEEDING
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH :
ADMINISTRATION (MSHA), : Docket No. VA 93-3
Petitioner
: A.C. No. 44-05668-03608-A
v. :
: No. 1 Mine
DANNY OWENS, EMPLOYED BY :
J & T COAL INCORPORATED, :
Respondent
:

DECISION

Appearances: Caryl L. Casden, Esq., Office of the Solicitor, U.S. Department of Labor, Arlington, Virginia, for Petitioner;
Louis Lee, Esq., McAfee, Bledsoe, Lovell & Lee, Norton, Virginia, for Respondent.

Before: Jerold Feldman

This proceeding is before me upon a petition for assessment of civil penalty under Section 110(c) of the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977 (the Act). The respondent, Danny Owens, is charged, as an agent of the corporate mine operator, with "knowingly authorizing, ordering, or carrying out" the actions which allegedly resulted in six alleged violations of mandatory safety standards. These violations are detailed in the Secretary's petition for assessment of civil penalty in which a penalty of $2,400 is proposed.

This matter was called for hearing in Big Stone Gap, Virginia, on June 15, 1993. At the hearing, counsel for the respondent presented a motion for the approval of settlement wherein Owens stipulated to the fact of the violations in issue and agreed to pay a total penalty of $1,200. The terms of the settlement agreement provide that Owens shall pay $600 immediately after the approval of settlement and $50 each month for twelve months thereafter. In support of this settlement, the respondent's counsel indicated that the respondent has recently become employed at a modest salary, that he has no liquid assets, and, that he must support a wife and several children. Thus, the reduction in the proposed penalty is predicated upon the respondent's current income and his ability to support his family. (Tr. 6).

In view of the respondent's stipulation to the fact of occurrence of the violations in issue and the information provided in support of the reduced civil penalty assessed in this matter, I concluded that the proposed settlement was in the public interest and granted the settlement motion from the bench. (Tr. 7).

ORDER

Accordingly, Danny Owens IS ORDERED to pay a civil penalty in the amount of $1,200 in full satisfaction for the six violations in issue. Payment is to be made in installments. The first payment of $600 is due within 30 days of the date of this decision. Beginning on September 1, 1993, on the first of each month, for twelve consecutive months, Owens shall pay $50 until the outstanding $600 of the $1,200 penalty is paid. Upon payment of the total sum of $1,200, this matter will be dismissed. If Owens fails to abide by this settlement decision, this proceeding will be reopened, and he will be subject to the full $2,400 penalty.

Jerold Feldman
Administrative Law Judge

Distribution:

Caryl L. Casden, Esq., Office of the Solicitor, U.S. Department of Labor, 4015 Wilson Boulevard, Room 516, Arlington, VA 22203 (Certified Mail)

Louis Lee, Esq., McAfee, Bledsoe, Lovell & Lee, 1033 Virginia Avenue, P.O. Box 656, Norton, VA 24273-0656 (Certified Mail)

Mr. Danny Owens, P.O. BOX 75, Pennington Gap, VA 24277 (Certified Mail)

vmy

What applies to your situation today?

This order bound one employer. Ezel checks the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent against your facts, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace