Southmountain Coal, Inc. (Commission decision, March 16, 1994)

Southmountain Coal, Inc. (FMSHRC VA 93-165, VA 93-166, and VA 93-108-R, et al.): Interlocutory review petition denied

Decision type
Commission decision
Dockets
VA 93-165, VA 93-166, VA 93-108-R, et al.
Decided
March 16, 1994
Outcome
Procedural
Precedential status
Citable Commission precedent
Checked against source
2026-08-14

Apply this precedent to your situation

This is citable Commission precedent from 1994, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.

Currency note: this decision dates from 1994
The MSHA standards may have been amended, penalty amounts have been adjusted, and later Commission or court decisions may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current compliance advice. Verify the current standard before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or penalty mentioned here.
Decision of the Commission
This is a decision of the Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission, the highest level of agency review, citable as Commission precedent. It may have been appealed to a U.S. Court of Appeals after issuance under 30 U.S.C. § 816; check subsequent history before relying on it. The full text below is from the official FMSHRC release.
About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official FMSHRC release. The full text is the agency's own release.
Read the official release (fmshrc.gov)

Plain-English summary

Southmountain Coal petitioned the Commission for interlocutory review of an administrative law judge's order that continued a limited stay while related criminal proceedings were pending. The Commission concluded that Southmountain had not established a basis for interlocutory review and denied the petition. The Commission also rejected Southmountain's argument that the Thunder Basin decision required advancing the criminal proceeding before the civil citations and penalties were resolved.

Decision snapshot

  • Governing authorities: 30 U.S.C. § 823(c) and 29 C.F.R. § 2700.76
  • Outcome: The petition for interlocutory review was denied.
  • Key point: A party seeking interlocutory review must establish a basis for the Commission to review an interlocutory ruling before the underlying proceeding is complete.

Full text (FMSHRC public release)

CCASE:
SOL (MSHA) V. SOUTHMOUNTAIN COAL
DDATE:
19940316
TTEXT:

~504

March 16, 1994

SECRETARY OF LABOR,
:
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH :
ADMINISTRATION (MSHA) : CIVIL PENALTY PROCEEDING
:
v. : Docket Nos. VA 93-165
: VA 93-166
SOUTHMOUNTAIN COAL, INC. :
: CONTEST PROCEEDING
and
:
: Docket Nos. VA 93-108-R, et al.
WILLIAM RIDLEY ELKINS
:
:
:

ORDER

Southmountain Coal, Inc. ("Southmountain") has filed with the Commission a petition for interlocutory review of the January 25, 1994, Decision and Order Granting Limited Continuance of Stay of Administrative Law Judge Gary Melick. By order dated February 7, 1994, the judge denied Southmountain's Motion for Certification for Review of Interlocutory Ruling. See Commission Procedural Rule 76, 58 Fed Reg. 12158, 12172 (March 3, 1993), to be codified at 29 C.F.R. 2700 (1993).

Subsequent to the Commission's receipt of Southmountain's petition for interlocutory review, the judge held a status conference with the parties on February 25, and on March 7 issued his Decision and Order Granting Limited Continuance of Stay. In that order, the judge agreed with the Secretary's position to continue the stay "until a verdict is reached in the criminal trials or a mistrial is declared." The criminal trial involving Southmountain is presently scheduled to begin on May 2, 1994, although the criminal investigation is continuing.

~505
Upon consideration of Southmountain's petition and the Secretary's response(Footnote 1)7, we conclude that Southmountain has failed to establish a basis for granting interlocutory review of the judge's orders and, therefore, we deny the petition.(Footnote 2)

___________
Arlene Holen, Chairman

___________
Richard V. Backley, Commissioner

___________
Joyce A. Doyle, Commissioner

__
1We reject Southmountain's contention that the decision in Thunder Basin Coal Co. v. Reich, __ U.S. __, 127 L.Ed. 2d 29, 62 U.S.L.W. 4058 (January 19, 1994), has any bearing on the advancement of a criminal proceeding in district court under the Mine Act prior to the disposition of civil citations and penalties by the Commission.
__

2Pursuant to section 113(c) of the Mine Act, 30 U.S.C. 823(c), we have designated ourselves as a panel of three members to exercise the powers of the Commission.

Does this precedent still control your case?

Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and applies it to your situation with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace