Cavalier Mining Corp (ALJ decision, March 17, 1993)
Cavalier Mining Corp (FMSHRC VA 91-34-D): Discrimination complaint dismissed without prejudice during bankruptcy
Apply this to your situation
This order from 1993 bound only the parties to this case; it isn't precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
Bobby Gene Strouth's discrimination complaint against Cavalier Mining came before the judge while the company was in bankruptcy. The bankruptcy stay prevented the discrimination case from proceeding to judgment. At the complainant's request, and without objection from the respondent, Judge Roy J. Maurer dismissed the case without prejudice. The complainant could refile within 90 days after Cavalier was discharged from bankruptcy.
Decision snapshot
- Cited standard(s): None
- Outcome: The discrimination proceeding was dismissed without prejudice.
- Key point: A bankruptcy stay prevented the case from proceeding, so the complaint was dismissed while preserving a limited right to refile after discharge.
Full text (FMSHRC public release)
FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION
OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGES
2 SKYLINE, 10th FLOOR
5203 LEESBURG PIKE
FALLS CHURCH, VIRGINIA 22041
BOBBY GENE STROUTH,
: DISCRIMINATION PROCEEDING
Complainant :
v. : Docket No. VA 91-34-D
:
CAVALIER MINING CORPORATION, : NORT CD 90-16 Respondent :
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
Appearances: Edward G. Stout, Esq., Bressler, Curcio & Stout, P.C., Bristol, Virginia, for Complainant;
No appearance for Respondent at the hearing.
Before: Judge Maurer
This case came on to be heard on December 15, 1992, in Abingdon, Virginia. No appearance was made on behalf of respondent because the respondent is currently involved in bankruptcy. This bankruptcy, originally filed under Chapter 11 has since been converted to a Chapter 7 bankruptcy proceeding from which there may or may not ever be any funds left over for distribution. In the meantime, section 362 of the Bankruptcy Code (11 U.S.C. § 362) provides for a stay that effectively prohibits this discrimination action from proceeding to judgment.
In consideration of these circumstances, the complainant has filed a motion to withdraw his complaint in this matter, without prejudice to him refiling it, at his option, within 90 days after respondent is discharged from its bankruptcy proceeding. The respondent does not object to the grant of this motion.
In light of the foregoing circumstances, the complainant's motion to withdraw his complaint and dismiss this case, without prejudice, is GRANTED.
It is hereby ORDERED that this case be DISMISSED without prejudice to the complainant refiling it with this Commission, at his option, within 90 days after respondent is discharged from its bankruptcy proceeding.
Roy J. Maurer
Administrative Law Judge
Distribution:
Timothy W. Gresham, Esq., Penn, Stuart, Eskridge & Jones, 208 E. Main Street, P. O. Box 2288, Abingdon, VA 24210 (Certified Mail)
Edward G. Stout, Esq., Bressler, Curcie & Stout, 600 Cumberland Street, P. O. Box 1478, Bristol, VA 24203 (Certified Mail)
dcp
What applies to your situation today?
This order bound one employer. Ezel checks the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent against your facts, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace