Tri-Son Mining, Inc. (ALJ decision, February 19, 1987)
Tri-Son Mining, Inc. (FMSHRC VA 86-8-D): Discrimination complaint dismissed after settlement
Apply this to your situation
This order from 1987 bound only the parties to this case; it isn't precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
The case was a discrimination proceeding involving Tri-Son Mining, Inc. The complainant asked to withdraw the complaint after the parties reached a mutually agreeable settlement. Judge Gary Melick approved the withdrawal under 29 C.F.R. § 2700.11 and dismissed the case.
Decision snapshot
- Governing rule: 29 C.F.R. § 2700.11.
- Outcome: The complaint was withdrawn after settlement, and the case was dismissed.
- Key point: The judge approved the agreed withdrawal and ended the discrimination proceeding.
Full text (FMSHRC public release)
CCASE:
ROY JOHNSON v. TRI-SON MINING
DDATE:
19870219
TTEXT:
Page 2
~319
Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission Office of Administrative Law Judges
ROY W. JOHNSON,
DISCRIMINATION PROCEEDING
COMPLAINANT
v. Docket No. VA 86-8-D
TRI-SON MINING, INC.,
NORT CD 86-6
RESPONDENT
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
Before: Judge Melick
Complainant, Roy W. Johnston requests approval to withdraw his Complaint in the captioned case on the grounds that the parties have reached a mutually agreeable settlement. Under the circumstances herein, permission to withdraw is granted. 29 C.F.R. | 2700.11. The case is therefore dismissed.
Gary Melick
Administrative Law Judge
What applies to your situation today?
This order bound one employer. Ezel checks the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent against your facts, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace