Secretary of Labor (MSHA) on behalf of Donald R. Hale v. 4-A Coal Company, Inc. (ALJ decision, October 1, 1985)

Secretary of Labor on behalf of Donald R. Hale v. 4-A Coal Company (FMSHRC VA 85-29-D): Unopposed dismissal motion granted

Decision type
ALJ decision
Docket
VA 85-29-D
Decided
October 1, 1985
Presiding judge
Outcome
Procedural
Precedential status
Checked against source
2026-10-20

What's the rule today?

This ALJ decision was superseded by the Commission's decision in the same case. Ezel starts from the controlling decision and answers your situation under current law, with citations.

Currency note: this decision dates from 1985
The MSHA standards may have been amended, penalty amounts have been adjusted, and later Commission or court decisions may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current compliance advice. Verify the current standard before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or penalty mentioned here.
ALJ decision, later reviewed by the Commission
This decision was issued by an FMSHRC Administrative Law Judge, but it was not the final word in the case: the Commission directed review, and the Commission's decision is the one citable as precedent.
About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official FMSHRC release. The full text is the agency's own release.
Read the official release (fmshrc.gov)

Plain-English summary

The Secretary of Labor brought a discrimination case on behalf of Donald R. Hale against 4-A Coal Company. The company moved to dismiss the case as untimely. Judge Joseph B. Kennedy found that the Secretary had not opposed the motion or requested more time to respond under the Commission's rules. He granted the motion and dismissed the case without deciding the discrimination allegation.

Decision snapshot

  • Cited standard: No mine safety standard is cited; the order refers to Commission Rules 9, 10 and 41.
  • Outcome: Operator's unopposed dismissal motion granted after the Secretary failed to respond or request more time.
  • Key point: The judge dismissed the complaint after the Secretary did not respond to the operator's motion within the allowed time.

Full text (FMSHRC public release)

CCASE:
SOL (MSHA) v. 4-A COAL
DDATE:
19851001
TTEXT:
~1552
Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission Office of Administrative Law Judges

SECRETARY OF LABOR,
DISCRIMINATION PROCEEDING
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH
ADMINISTRATION (MSHA),
Docket No. VA 85-29-D
ON BEHALF OF DONALD R. HALE,
NORT CD 83-8
COMPLAINANT v.

4-A COAL COMPANY, INC.,
No. 4 Mine
RESPONDENT

ORDER

Before: Judge Kennedy

On August 29, 1985, the operator filed and served a motion to dismiss the captioned wrongful discharge case on the grounds it was untimely. Under the Commission Rules, the Secretary had 10 days to respond. The Secretary having failed to respond or otherwise oppose the operator's motion or to seasonably move for an enlargement of time, it is ORDERED that the operator's motion be, and hereby, is GRANTED and the case DISMISSED. See Rules 9, 10, and 41.

Joseph B, Kennedy
Administrative Law Judge

What controls your case today?

The Commission reviewed this case, and its decision is the one that controls. Ezel starts there and answers your situation under current law, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace