Secretary of Labor on behalf of Otis G. Lawson v. Paramont Mining Corp. (ALJ decision, June 11, 1981)
Secretary of Labor on behalf of Otis G. Lawson v. Paramont Mining Corp. (FMSHRC VA 81-44-D): $3,500 discrimination settlement approved
Apply this to your situation
This order from 1981 bound only the parties to this case; it isn't precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
The Secretary asked to withdraw a discrimination complaint brought on behalf of miner Otis Lawson against Paramont Mining Corp. Lawson and Paramont had reached an agreement that included a release of the discrimination claim. Judge Joseph B. Kennedy independently reviewed the settlement and found it consistent with the Mine Act's purposes and policy. He approved it, ordered Paramont to pay Lawson $3,500 promptly, and dismissed the matter subject to payment. The order does not state the underlying facts of Lawson's complaint.
Decision snapshot
- Cited standards: None stated in this settlement order.
- Outcome: Settlement approved; Paramont ordered to pay Lawson $3,500, with dismissal subject to payment.
- Key point: The judge approved the withdrawal after independently reviewing the settlement.
Full text (FMSHRC public release)
FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION
OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGES
2 SKYLINE, 10th FLOOR
5203 LEESBURG PIKE
FALLS CHURCH, VIRGINIA 22041
JUN 11 1981
SECRETARY OF LABOR,
: Complaint of Discrimination
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH
:
ADMINISTRATION (MSHA),
: Docket No. VA 81-44-D
ON BEHALF OF OTIS G. LAWSON,
:
Complainant
: Deep Mine No. 7
:
v. :
:
PARAMONT MINING CORP.,
:
Respondent
:
DECISION AND ORDER
The Secretary moves to withdraw the captioned discrimination com- plaint on the ground that the complaining miner has entered into a settlement agreement with respondent. This agreement includes a release of the discrimination claim and a consent to dismissal of the captioned complaint..
Based on an independent evaluation and de novo review of the circumstances, I conclude the settlement agreement is in accord with the purposes and policy of the Act.
Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the same be, and hereby is, APPROVED. It is FURTHER ORDERED that respondent pay Mr. Lawson the amount of the settlement agreed upon, $3,500, forthwith and that subject to payment the captioned matter be DISMISSED.
Joseph B. Kennedy
Administrative Law Judge
Distribution:
Covette Rooney, Esq., U.S. Department of Labor, Office of the Solicitor, 3535 Market St., Philadelphia, PA 19104 (Certified Mail)
Michael T. Heenan, Esq., Smith, Heenan, Althen, Zanolli, 1110 Vermont Ave., NW, Washington, DC 20005 (Certified Mail)
What applies to your situation today?
This order bound one employer. Ezel checks the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent against your facts, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace