Secretary of Labor v. Blackjewel, LLC (ALJ decision, August 30, 2019)
Secretary of Labor v. Blackjewel, LLC (FMSHRC VA 2019-139): One violation resolved by default
Apply this to your situation
This order from 2019 bound only the parties to this case; it isn't precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
This case involved one alleged violation at Blackjewel's D-17 mine and a proposed penalty of $1,380. Blackjewel's counsel stated that, because of pending bankruptcy proceedings, the company expected a default order and did not respond to the judge's show-cause order. Judge Priscilla M. Rae entered default and ordered Blackjewel to pay the full $1,380 penalty.
Decision snapshot
- Cited authority: 30 U.S.C. § 815(d)
- Outcome: Blackjewel was found in default and ordered to pay $1,380 for one violation.
- Key point: Failure to respond to a show-cause order permits default and summary disposition under Commission procedure.
Full text (FMSHRC public release)
FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH
REVIEW COMMISSION
OFFICE OF
ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGES
1331 PENNSYLVANIA
AVE., N.W., SUITE 520N
WASHINGTON, DC
20004-1710
TELEPHONE: 202-434-9950
/ FAX: 202-434-9949
August 30, 2019
SECRETARY
OF LABOR
MINE
SAFETY AND HEALTH
ADMINISTRATION
(MSHA),
Petitioner,
v.
BLACKJEWEL
LLC,
Respondent.
CIVIL
PENALTY PROCEEDINGS
Docket
No. VA 2019-0139
A.C.
No. 44-07220-492667
Mine:
D-17
ORDER OF DEFAULT
AND ORDER TO PAY
This case is before me upon a petition
for assessment of civil penalties under section 105(d) of the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977, 30 U.S.C. § 815(d).
This docket involves 1 alleged violation
and a total proposed penalty of $1,380.00. On August 14, 2019, I issued an Order to Show Cause directing Respondent to explain why an order of default should not be issued against it given its stated posture of not responding to any administrative orders from this office. During a conference call with the parties on August 13, 2019, Respondent’s counsel relayed that in light of pending bankruptcy proceedings, Respondent would expect the court to issue an order of default based upon its failure to respond to a show cause order. Respondent failed to show cause by the deadline of August 28, 2019.
Respondent has failed to comply with my Order
to Show Cause. The Commission’s procedural rules permit a finding of default and summary disposition of a case after issuance of a show cause order when a party has failed to comply with a judge’s orders. 29 C.F.R. § 2700.66.
WHEREFORE , I find
Respondent to be IN DEFAULT .
Respondent is hereby ORDERED to
pay a total penalty of $1,380.00 within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order. [1]
/s/ Priscilla M. Rae
Priscilla M. Rae
Administrative Law Judge
Distribution (Electronic Mail &
U.S. Certified Mail, Return Receipt Requested):
Hagel
Campbell, CLR, U. S. Department of Labor, MSHA, P.O. Box 560, Norton, VA 24273
Peter
S. Gould, Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP, 1801 California Street, Suite 4900, Denver, Colorado 80202
Stephen
D. Lerner, Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP, 1801 California Street, Suite 4900, Denver, Colorado 80202
/smp
[1] Checks or money
orders should be sent to: Mine Safety & Health Administration, U.S. Department of Labor, P.O. Box 790390, St. Louis, MO 63179-0390.
What applies to your situation today?
This order bound one employer. Ezel checks the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent against your facts, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace