Secretary of Labor v. Dominion Coal Corporation

Plain-English summary

The Secretary sought a $12,500 penalty against Dominion Coal based on an earlier ruling that the company interfered with Scott McGlothlin's Mine Act rights when he sought Part 90 protection. In the related discrimination case, McGlothlin and Dominion proposed agreed relief and dismissal, but the Judge rejected terms that would release Dominion from the already-adjudicated liability finding. Judge Jerold Feldman explained that the liability ruling could bind Dominion in the penalty case through collateral estoppel unless the Commission later vacated it. Because relief and the ultimate status of liability were still unresolved, he stayed the penalty proceeding until the discrimination case reached a final disposition.

Decision snapshot

• Governing provisions: 30 U.S.C. §§ 815(c) and 815(d)
• Outcome: The $12,500 civil-penalty proceeding was stayed pending final resolution of the related discrimination liability.
• Key point: A penalty case based on adjudicated discrimination liability may be paused while that liability remains subject to further Commission action.

Full text (FMSHRC public release)

FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION

FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW
COMMISSION

OFFICE OF
ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGES

1331 Pennsylvania
Avenue, NW, Suite 520N

Washington, DC 20004

October 29, 2015

SECRETARY OF LABOR,

MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH

ADMINISTRATION (MSHA),

Petitioner,

v.

DOMINION COAL CORPORATION,

Respondent.

CIVIL PENALTY PROCEEDING

Docket No. VA 2015-285

Mine: Dominion No. 7

Mine ID: 44-06499

STAY ORDER
PENDING ULTIMATE DISPOSITION

OF UNDERLYING
DISCRIMINATION PROCEEDING

Before: Judge Feldman

This proceeding is before me based
upon a petition for assessment of civil penalty filed by the Secretary on July
24, 2015, pursuant to section 105(d) of the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act
of 1977 (the Act). 30 U.S.C. § 815(d). The Secretary seeks to impose a civil
penalty of $12,500.00 as a consequence of a June 11, 2015, Decision on
Liability in a 105(c)(3) discrimination proceeding, docketed as VA 2014-233,
which concluded that Dominion Coal Corporation (“Dominion”) was liable for a
violation of section 105(c) of the Act when it interfered with Scott D.
McGlothlin’s rights under Part 90 of the Act. McGlothlin v. Dominion Coal
Corp., 37 FMSHRC 1256 (June 2015) (ALJ).

On September 2, 2015, the parties
in Docket No. VA 2014-233 filed a Joint Motion to Dismiss McGlothlin’s complaint
in light of the parties’ proposed agreed-upon relief.        The parties’ Joint
Motion to Dismiss was predicated upon McGlothlin’s agreement that “the parties
jointly move the Court to dismiss all claims in this action with prejudice,” in
exchange for Dominion’s agreement to the relief, including attorney fees,
sought by McGlothlin.         On October 21, 2015, the parties’ request to
dismiss McGlothlin’s complaint was denied because it was contingent on proposed
settlement terms that seek to release Dominion from an adjudicated finding of
liability in a Commission proceeding. [1]
Thus, while the appropriate relief to be awarded to McGlothlin in Docket No. VA
2014-233 is yet to be determined, Dominion will be precluded from denying
liability in this civil penalty proceeding brought by the Secretary

based on the doctrine of collateral estoppel, unless the
Decision on Liability is ultimately vacated by the Commission.

As such, in view of the above, IT
IS ORDERED that the captioned docket IS STAYED pending the ultimate
resolution of the issue of Dominion’s liability for violation of section 105(c)
of the Act in Docket No. VA 2014-233.

/s/
Jerold Feldman

Jerold Feldman

Administrative
Law Judge

Distribution:

Pollyanna Hampton, Esq., U.S. Department of Labor, Office of
the Solicitor, 201 12th Street, Fifth Floor, Arlington, VA
22202-5450

David Hardy, Esq., Scott Wickline, Esq., Hardy Pence PLLC,
500 Lee Street East, Suite 701, P.O. Box 2548, Charleston, WV 25329

Evan B. Smith, Esq., Wes Addington, Esq., Appalachian
Citizens Law Center, Inc.,         317 Main Street, Whiteburg, KY 41858

Tony Oppegard, Esq., P.O. Box 22446, Lexington, KY 40522

/acp     

[1] Although the Decision on Liability is not final in
that the judge retains jurisdiction under Commission Rule 69(b), a decision on
liability is an interlocutory decision that may be appealed or reviewed,
subject to the discretion of the Commission, pursuant to the provisions of
Commission Rule 76(a). 29 C.F.R. §§ 2700.69(b), 2700.76(a). However, the
parties may not mutually agree to “vacate” an interlocutory liability decision.