Dickenson-Russell Coal Company, LLC (ALJ decision, March 28, 2013)

Dickenson-Russell Coal Company, LLC (FMSHRC VA 2012-397): Contest withdrawn and $971 citation affirmed

Decision type
ALJ decision
Docket
VA 2012-397
Decided
March 28, 2013
Presiding judge
Outcome
Citations affirmed
Precedential status
Final order, not precedent
Checked against source
2026-08-03
Cited standards

Apply this to your situation

This order from 2013 bound only the parties to this case; it isn't precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent say, with citations.

Currency note: this decision dates from 2013
The MSHA standards may have been amended, penalty amounts have been adjusted, and later Commission or court decisions may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current compliance advice. Verify the current standard before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or penalty mentioned here.
Final ALJ decision, not Commission precedent
This decision became final under the 40-day rule in 30 U.S.C. § 823(d)(1) because no later Commission review appears in the official index. It binds the parties but is not Commission precedent. The full text below is from the official FMSHRC release.
About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official FMSHRC release. The full text is the agency's own release.
Read the official release (fmshrc.gov)

Plain-English summary

Dickenson-Russell Coal withdrew its contest after paying the penalty for a single citation. The Commission had previously accepted interlocutory review of a settlement question but vacated that review order and remanded after the withdrawal. Judge Thomas P. McCarthy found the proceeding moot and restored the citation to its original terms. The S&S citation remained reasonably likely to cause lost-workdays or restricted-duty injuries to three miners, with moderate negligence and a $971 penalty.

Decision snapshot

  • Governing authority: 30 U.S.C. § 815(d)
  • Outcome: The contest was withdrawn, and the citation and $971 penalty were affirmed as originally proposed.
  • Key point: Withdrawing the contest returned the citation to its pre-contest status and mooted the pending settlement dispute.

Full text (FMSHRC public release)

FOR#2A.FRM

FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION

OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGES

1331 PENNSYLVANIA AVE., N.W., SUITE 520N

WASHINGTON, DC 20004-1710

TELEPHONE: 202-434-9958 / FAX: 202-434-9949

March 28, 2013

SECRETARY OF LABOR

MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH 

ADMINISTRATION (MSHA),

Petitioner

v.

DICKENSON-RUSSELL COAL

COMPANY, LLC,

Respondent

CIVIL PENALTY PROCEEDING

Docket No. VA 2012-397

A.C. No. 44-06864-286093-01

Mine: Cherokee Mine

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO WITHDRAW CONTEST

ORDER TO PAY

Before:            Judge McCarthy 

This case is before me upon a Petition for Assessment of Civil Penalty under section 105(d) of the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977, 30 U.S.C. § 815(d). On February 21, 2013, I issued an Order Rejecting Amended Settlement Motion and Order for Certification of Interlocutory Review. In this order, I certified two questions for interlocutory review by the Commission: (1) whether the Secretary can remove a significant and substantial designation without leave of the Commission in settlement of a proposed assessment of civil penalty that has been contested, and (2) whether the Mine Act authorizes Commission review of non-pecuniary settlement provisions. On March 4, 2013, the Commission granted review of the first issue and ordered that the parties file response briefs in thirty days.

On March 11, 2013, Respondent filed a Motion to Withdraw Contest of the single violation involved in this matter. In its motion, Dickenson-Russell states that it has paid the civil penalty associated with Citation No. 8190957, and that it withdraws its notice of contest of the citation. On March 27, 2013, the Commission issued an order vacating the order directing interlocutory review and remanded this case to the undersigned for further proceedings, including a determination of whether this proceeding is moot.

Upon review of the record and Respondent’s withdrawal of contest, I find that the current proceeding is moot.

Given Respondent’s withdrawal of contest, this matter reverts back to the status quo ante prior to said contest. Accordingly, the citation and proposed penalty of $971.00 are affirmed as originally proposed in the Secretary’s Petition for Assessment of Civil Penalty. Citation No 8190957 shall be recorded as “reasonably likely” to cause an injury or illness and that such injury would reasonably be expected to result in “lost workdays or restricted duty” to three miners. The violative condition remains classified as the result of “moderate” negligence, and the S&S designation remains intact.

Accordingly, the Motion to Withdraw Contest is GRANTED and the operator is ORDERED to pay $971.00 within thirty days of the date of this decision, if Respondent has not done so already.

/s/ Thomas P. McCarthy

Thomas P. McCarthy

Administrative Law Judge

Distribution:

A. Scott Hecker, Esq., Office of the Solicitor, U.S. Department of Labor, 1100 Wilson Blvd., 22nd Floor West, Arlington, VA 22209-2247

Douglas N White, Esq., Office of the Solicitor, U.S. Department of Labor, 1100 Wilson Blvd., 22nd Floor West, Arlington, VA 22209-2247

Robert S. Wilson, Esq., Office of the Solicitor, U.S. Department of Labor, 1100 Wilson Blvd., 22nd Floor West, Arlington, VA 22209-2247

Cameron S. Bell, Esq., Penn Stuart, P.O. Box 2288, Abingdon, VA 24212

/tjr

What applies to your situation today?

This order bound one employer. Ezel checks the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent against your facts, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace