Woodway Stone Company (Commission decision, April 3, 2013)
Woodway Stone Company (FMSHRC VA 2011-474-M): Default reopened for consideration of settlement
Apply this precedent to your situation
This is citable Commission precedent from 2013, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.
Plain-English summary
Woodway Stone defaulted after failing to answer a penalty petition and show-cause order. The operator said it had negotiated a settlement, and the Secretary did not oppose reopening for the limited purpose of allowing the settlement motion to be considered. The agency representative had filed that motion without knowing that a default order had already taken effect. In the interest of justice, the Commission vacated the default and remanded the case.
Decision snapshot
- Governing authority: 30 U.S.C. § 823(d); 29 C.F.R. §§ 2700.1(b), 2700.69(b), and 2700.70(a)
- Outcome: The default order was vacated and the case was remanded for consideration of the settlement.
- Key point: A default could be reopened where the parties had already negotiated and submitted a settlement without knowing the default had taken effect.
Full text (FMSHRC public release)
Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission
FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION
1331 PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE, NW, SUITE 520N
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20004-1710
April 3, 2013
SECRETARY OF LABOR,
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH
ADMINISTRATION (MSHA)
v.
WOODWAY STONE COMPANY
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
Docket No. VA 2011-474-M
A.C. No. 44-00167-253311
BEFORE: Jordan, Chairman; Young and Nakamura, Commissioners
ORDER
BY THE COMMISSION:
This matter arises under the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977, 30 U.S.C.
§ 801 et seq. (2006) (“Mine Act”). On June 20, 2012, the Commission received from Woodway Stone Company (“Woodway”) a motion seeking to reopen a penalty assessment proceeding and relieve it from the default order entered against it.
On February 7, 2012, Chief Administrative Law Judge Lesnick issued an Order to Show Cause which by its terms became a Default Order if the operator did not file an answer within 30 days. This Order to Show Cause was issued in response to Woodway’s failure to answer the Secretary’s June 23, 2011 Petition for Assessment of Civil Penalty. The Commission did not receive Woodway’s answer within 30 days, so the default order became effective on March 9, 2012.
The record shows that the Show Cause Order was delivered on February 13, 2012. Woodway asserts that it had negotiated a settlement in this case. The Secretary does not oppose the request to reopen for the limited purpose of allowing the submission of her motion to approve settlement, filed April 2, 2012. The Secretary further states that the Conference Litigation Representative (“CLR”) was unaware of the default order when she filed the settlement motion.
The judge’s jurisdiction in this matter terminated when the default occurred. 29 C.F.R.
§ 2700.69(b). Under the Mine Act and the Commission’s procedural rules, relief from a judge’s decision may be sought by filing a petition for discretionary review within 30 days of its issuance. 30 U.S.C. § 823(d)(2)(A)(i); 29 C.F.R. § 2700.70(a). If the Commission does not direct review within 40 days of a decision’s issuance, it becomes a final decision of the Commission. 30 U.S.C. § 823(d)(1). Consequently, the judge’s order here has become a final decision of the Commission.
In evaluating requests to reopen final orders, the Commission has found guidance in Rule 60(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure under which, for example, a party could be entitled to relief from a final order of the Commission on the basis of mistake, inadvertence, or excusable neglect. See 29 C.F.R. § 2700.1(b) (“the Commission and its Judges shall be guided so far as practicable by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure”); Jim Walter Res., Inc., 15 FMSHRC 782, 786-89 (May 1993) (“JWR”). We have also observed that default is a harsh remedy and that, if the defaulting party can make a showing of good cause for a failure to timely respond, the case may be reopened and appropriate proceedings on the merits permitted. See Coal Prep. Servs., Inc., 17 FMSHRC 1529, 1530 (Sept. 1995).
Having reviewed Woodway’s request and the Secretary’s response, in the interest of justice, we hereby reopen the proceeding and vacate the Default Order. Accordingly, this case is remanded to the Chief Administrative Law Judge for further proceedings pursuant to the Mine Act and the Commission’s Procedural Rules, 29 C.F.R. Part 2700.
/s/ Mary Lu Jordan
Mary Lu Jordan, Chairman
/s/Michael G. Young
Michael G. Young, Commissioner
/s/ Patrick K. Nakamura
Patrick K. Nakamura, Commissioner
Distribution:
David Jesse, President
Woodway Stone Co.
P.O. Box 307
Pennington Gap, VA 24277
W. Christian Schumann, Esq.
Office of the Solicitor
U.S. Department of Labor
1100 Wilson Blvd., Room 2220
Arlington, VA 22209-2296
Melanie Garris
Office of Civil Penalty Compliance
MSHA
U.S. Dept. Of Labor
1100 Wilson Blvd., 25th Floor
Arlington, VA 22209-3939
Chief Administrative Law Judge Robert J. Lesnick
Federal Mine Safety & Health Review Commission
1331 Pennsylvania Avenue, N. W., Suite 520N
Washington, D.C. 20004-1710
Does this precedent still control your case?
Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and applies it to your situation with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace