Secretary of Labor v. John R. Hurley
Secretary of Labor v. John R. Hurley (FMSHRC VA 2010-7): Contest timely because assessment was not received
Apply this precedent to your situation
This is citable Commission precedent from 2009, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.
Plain-English summary
MSHA sought an individual penalty against John Hurley under Mine Act section 110(c) and attempted to deliver the assessment by Federal Express. Hurley did not receive it despite trying to do so. After a delinquency notice arrived, his counsel obtained a copy from MSHA and immediately filed a contest. The Commission held that proper assessment notice had never been given and that Hurley's contest was timely once he received notice. It treated the reopening motion as moot and remanded the case for assignment to a judge and a penalty petition.
Decision snapshot
- Governing provisions: 30 U.S.C. §§ 815(a) and 820(c); 29 C.F.R. §§ 2700.25 through 2700.28
- Outcome: The reopening motion was moot because the assessment never became final, and the case was remanded for ordinary penalty proceedings.
- Key point: The contest period does not run before an individual receives proper notice of a proposed section 110(c) penalty.
Full text (FMSHRC public release)
Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission
FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION
601 NEW JERSEY AVENUE, NW
SUITE 9500
WASHINGTON, DC 20001
December 10, 2009
SECRETARY OF LABOR,
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH
ADMINISTRATION (MSHA)
v.
JOHN R. HURLEY
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
Docket No. VA 2010-7
A.C. No. 44-06685-182175 A
BEFORE: Jordan, Chairman; Duffy, Young, and Cohen, Commissioners
ORDER
BY THE COMMISSION:
This matter arises under the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977, 30 U.S.C.
§ 801 et seq. (2006) (“Mine Act”). On October 5, 2009, the Commission received a motion by
counsel seeking to reopen a penalty assessment against John R. Hurley under section 110(c) of
the Mine Act, 30 U.S.C. § 820(c), that may have become a final order of the Commission
pursuant to section 105(a) of the Mine Act, 30 U.S.C. § 815(a).
Under the Commission’s Procedural Rules, an individual charged under section 110(c)
has 30 days following receipt of the proposed penalty assessment within which to notify the
Secretary of Labor that he or she wishes to contest the penalty. 29 C.F.R. § 2700.26. If the
individual fails to notify the Secretary, the proposed penalty assessment is deemed a final order
of the Commission. 29 C.F.R. § 2700.27.
On April 14, 2009, the Department of Labor’s Mine Safety and Health Administration
(“MSHA”) issued Proposed Assessment No. 00182175 A to Hurley relating to Citation
No. 6629283, which had been issued on December 19, 2007. The record indicates that MSHA
sought to deliver the assessment by Federal Express, but Hurley never received the assessment,
despite his efforts to do so. Soon after Hurley received a delinquency notice from MSHA
regarding the assessment, his counsel made arrangements to obtain a copy of the assessment
from MSHA and immediately filed a notice of contest. The Secretary of Labor does not oppose
reopening in this instance.
The record indicates that Hurley never received proper notification of the proposed
penalty assessment as required under Commission Procedural Rule 25.
Under the circumstances
of this case, we conclude that Hurley timely notified the Secretary that he wished to contest the
proposed penalty once he had such notice.
Because the proposed penalty assessment did not become not a final order of the
Commission, we will treat the motion to reopen as moot. We remand this matter to the Chief
Administrative Law Judge for assignment to a judge. This case shall proceed pursuant to the
Mine Act and the Commission’s Procedural Rules, 29 C.F.R. Part 2700. Consistent with Rule
28, the Secretary shall file a petition for assessment of penalty within 45 days of the date of this
order. See 29 C.F.R. § 2700.28.
Mary Lu Jordan, Chairman
Michael F. Duffy, Commissioner
Michael G. Young, Commissioner
Robert F. Cohen, Jr., Commissioner
Distribution:
Robert H. Beatty, Jr., Esq.
Dinsmore & Shohl, LLP
215 Don Knotts Blvd., Suite 310
Morgantown, WV 26501
W. Christian Schumann, Esq.
Office of the Solicitor
U.S. Department of Labor
1100 Wilson Blvd., Room 2220
Arlington, VA 22209-2296
Myra James, Chief
Office of Civil Penalty Compliance
MSHA
U.S. Dept. Of Labor
1100 Wilson Blvd., 25th Floor
Arlington, VA 22209-3939
Chief Administrative Law Judge Robert J. Lesnick
Federal Mine Safety & Health Review Commission
601 New Jersey Avenue, N.W., Suite 9500
Washington, D.C. 20001-2021
Get today's answer for your situation
You just read Commission precedent from 2009. Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and answers your specific situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.