Conaway Mining Company, LLC
Conaway Mining Company, LLC (FMSHRC VA 2010-593): Default reopened after timely answer and settlement
Apply this precedent to your situation
This is citable Commission precedent from 2012, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.
Plain-English summary
Conaway Mining defaulted after the Commission did not receive an answer to the Secretary's penalty petition. Conaway said it had timely answered and learned of the default only after agreeing to settle the case. The Secretary did not oppose reopening, and her representative confirmed receiving Conaway's answer before later filing a settlement motion. The Commission reopened the proceeding, vacated the default order, and remanded the case for further action.
Decision snapshot
- Cited provisions: 30 U.S.C. §§ 801 and 823(d); 29 C.F.R. §§ 2700.1(b), 2700.69(b), and 2700.70(a)
- Outcome: The default order was vacated, and the case was remanded to the Chief Administrative Law Judge.
- Key point: A default may be reopened when the operator timely served its answer on the Secretary and the parties later reached a settlement.
Full text (FMSHRC public release)
Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission
FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION
1331 PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE, NW, SUITE 520N
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20004-1710
September 14, 2012
SECRETARY OF LABOR,
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH
ADMINISTRATION (MSHA)
v.
CONAWAY MINING COMPANY, LLC
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
Docket No. VA 2010-593
A.C. No. 44-07082-230421-01
BEFORE: Jordan, Chairman; Young and Nakamura, Commissioners
ORDER
BY THE COMMISSION:
This matter arises under the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977, 30 U.S.C.
§ 801 et seq. (2006) (“Mine Act”). On January 4, 2012, the Commission received from Conaway
Mining Company, LLC (“Conaway”) a motion seeking to reopen a penalty assessment
proceeding and relieve it from the default order entered against it.
On May 6, 2011, Chief Administrative Law Judge Lesnick issued an Order to Show
Cause which by its terms became a Default Order if the operator did not file an answer within
30 days. This Order to Show Cause was issued in response to Conaway’s failure to answer the
Secretary’s November 9, 2010 Petition for Assessment of Civil Penalty. The Commission did
not receive Conaway’s answer within 30 days, so the default order became effective on June 6,
2011.
Conaway asserts that it timely answered the petition on December 3, 2010. Conaway
further states that it did not know it was placed in default until after it agreed to a settlement in
this case. The Secretary does not oppose the request to reopen, and notes that the Conference
Litigation Representative (“CLR”) received Conaway’s answer to the petition on December 16,
2010. The CLR also notes that she filed a motion to approve settlement with the Commission on
December 7, 2011. The record shows that the Show Cause Order was delivered on May 20,
2011.
The judge’s jurisdiction in this matter terminated when the default occurred. 29 C.F.R.
§ 2700.69(b). Under the Mine Act and the Commission’s procedural rules, relief from a judge’s
decision may be sought by filing a petition for discretionary review within 30 days of its
issuance. 30 U.S.C. § 823(d)(2)(A)(i); 29 C.F.R. § 2700.70(a). If the Commission does not
direct review within 40 days of a decision’s issuance, it becomes a final decision of the
Commission. 30 U.S.C. § 823(d)(1). Consequently, the judge’s order here has become a final
decision of the Commission.
In evaluating requests to reopen final orders, the Commission has found guidance in Rule
60(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure under which, for example, a party could be entitled
to relief from a final order of the Commission on the basis of mistake, inadvertence, or excusable
neglect. See 29 C.F.R. § 2700.1(b) (“the Commission and its Judges shall be guided so far as
practicable by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure”); Jim Walter Res., Inc., 15 FMSHRC 782,
786-89 (May 1993) (“JWR”). We have also observed that default is a harsh remedy and that, if
the defaulting party can make a showing of good cause for a failure to timely respond, the case
may be reopened and appropriate proceedings on the merits permitted. See Coal Prep. Servs.,
Inc., 17 FMSHRC 1529, 1530 (Sept. 1995).
Having reviewed Conaway’s request and the Secretary’s response, in the interest of
justice, we hereby reopen the proceeding and vacate the Default Order. Accordingly, this case is
remanded to the Chief Administrative Law Judge for further proceedings pursuant to the Mine
Act and the Commission’s Procedural Rules, 29 C.F.R. Part 2700.
/s/ Mary Lu Jordan
Mary Lu Jordan, Chair
/s/Michael G. Young
Michael G. Young, Commissioner
/s/ Patrick K. Nakamura
Patrick K. Nakamura, Commissioner
Distribution:
Sam Blankenship, Owner
Conaway Mining Company, LLC
120 Sprint Drive
Blountville, TN 37617
W. Christian Schumann, Esq.
Office of the Solicitor
U.S. Department of Labor
1100 Wilson Blvd., Room 2220
Arlington, VA 22209-2296
Melanie Garris
Office of Civil Penalty Compliance
MSHA
U.S. Dept. of Labor
1100 Wilson Blvd., 25th Floor
Arlington, VA 22209-3939
Chief Administrative Law Judge Robert J. Lesnick
Federal Mine Safety & Health Review Commission
601 New Jersey Avenue, N. W., Suite 9500
Washington, D.C. 20001-2021
Get today's answer for your situation
You just read Commission precedent from 2012. Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and answers your specific situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.