FMSHRC Commission decision Docket VA 2009-378 Decided April 26, 2010 Remanded

Secretary of Labor v. Cedar Creek Coal, LLC

Secretary of Labor v. Cedar Creek Coal, LLC (FMSHRC VA 2009-378): Undelivered assessment never became final

Apply this precedent to your situation

This is citable Commission precedent from 2010, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.

Currency note: this decision dates from 2010
The MSHA standards may have been amended, penalty amounts have been adjusted, and later Commission or court decisions may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current compliance advice. Verify the current standard before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or penalty mentioned here.
Decision of the Commission
This is a decision of the Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission, the highest level of agency review, citable as Commission precedent. It may have been appealed to a U.S. Court of Appeals after issuance under 30 U.S.C. § 816; check subsequent history before relying on it. The full text below is from the official FMSHRC release.
About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official FMSHRC release. The full text is the agency's own release.
Read the official release (fmshrc.gov)

Plain-English summary

Federal Express could not deliver Cedar Creek Coal's proposed penalty assessment, reporting an incorrect address, while the operator maintained that the address was correct. The Secretary did not oppose relief and advised Cedar Creek to verify its address of record. The Commission held that the company never received the notice required by its procedural rules, so the assessment never became a final Commission order. It treated the reopening request as moot and remanded the matter. Cedar Creek was directed to submit the assessment form to MSHA within 30 days if it had not already done so.

Decision snapshot

  • Governing provisions: 30 U.S.C. § 815(a); 29 C.F.R. §§ 2700.25 and 2700.26
  • Outcome: Reopening was moot because the assessment never became final, and the matter was remanded.
  • Key point: A proposed assessment does not become final when the operator never receives the notice required by Commission rules.

Full text (FMSHRC public release)

Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission

FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION

601 NEW JERSEY AVENUE, NW

SUITE 9500

WASHINGTON, DC 20001

April 26, 2010

SECRETARY OF LABOR,

MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH

ADMINISTRATION (MSHA),

v.

CEDAR CREEK COAL, LLC

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

Docket No. VA 2009-378

A.C. No. 44-07211-185244

BEFORE: Jordan, Chairman; Duffy, Young, and Cohen, Commissioners

ORDER

BY THE COMMISSION:

This matter arises under the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977, 30 U.S.C.
§ 801 et seq. (2006) (“Mine Act”). On July 30, 2009, the Commission received from Cedar
Creek Coal, LLC (“Cedar Creek”) a letter seeking to reopen a penalty assessment that may have
become a final order of the Commission pursuant to section 105(a) of the Mine Act, 30 U.S.C.

§ 815(a).

Under section 105(a) of the Mine Act, an operator who wishes to contest a proposed
penalty must notify the Secretary of Labor no later than 30 days after receiving the proposed
penalty assessment. If the operator fails to notify the Secretary, the proposed penalty assessment
is deemed a final order of the Commission. 30 U.S.C. § 815(a).                   

On May 12, 2009, the Department of Labor’s Mine Safety and Health Administration
(“MSHA”) issued Proposed Penalty Assessment No. 000185244 to Cedar Creek. The record
indicates that Federal Express was unable to deliver the proposed penalty assessment. Although
Federal Express indicates that the reason for non-delivery was an incorrect address, the operator
claims that the assessment was addressed correctly. The Secretary states that she does not
oppose the reopening of the proposed penalty assessment. She notes that the operator should
ensure that its address of record is accurate for future penalty assessments.

The record indicates that Cedar Creek never received notification of the proposed penalty
assessment as required under Commission Procedural Rule 25.

Under the circumstances of this
case, we conclude that Cedar Creek was not notified of the penalty assessment, within the
meaning of the Commission’s Procedural Rules, and the proposed penalty assessment has not
become a final order of the Commission. We also conclude that Cedar Creek has received a copy
of the proposed penalty assessment since it is attached to the request to reopen.

Because the proposed penalty assessment did not become a final order of the
Commission, we will treat the request to reopen as moot. We hereby remand this matter to the
Chief Administrative Law Judge for further proceedings pursuant to the Mine Act and the
Commission’s Procedural Rules, 29 C.F.R. Part 2700. If the operator has not already done so, it
should submit the proposed assessment form to MSHA, within 30 days of the date of this order.
See 29 C.F.R. § 2700.26.


Mary Lu Jordan, Chairman


Michael F. Duffy, Commissioner


Michael G. Young, Commissioner


Robert F. Cohen, Jr., Commissioner   

Distribution:

Mr. Danny Justus

Cedar Creek Coal, LLC

37 Smith Rd.

Phelps, KY 41553

W. Christian Schumann, Esq.

Office of the Solicitor

U.S. Department of Labor

1100 Wilson Blvd., Room 2220

Arlington, VA 22209-2296

Myra James, Chief

Office of Civil Penalty Compliance

MSHA

U.S. Dept. of Labor

1100 Wilson Blvd., 25th Floor

Arlington, VA 22209-3939

Chief Administrative Law Judge Robert J. Lesnick

Federal Mine Safety & Health Review Commission

601 New Jersey Avenue, N.W., Suite 9500

Washington, D.C. 20001-2021

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read Commission precedent from 2010. Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.