Woodrow Wilson Cosby v. Shaw Maintenance Group (ALJ decision, February 14, 2013)
Woodrow Wilson Cosby v. Shaw Maintenance Group (FMSHRC VA 2009-322-DM): Discharge claim settled for payment and employment protections
Apply this to your situation
This order from 2013 bound only the parties to this case; it isn't precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
Woodrow Wilson Cosby alleged that Shaw Maintenance Group unlawfully discharged him from the Nestle-Purina site under the Mine Act's discrimination provisions. The parties settled before the hearing record opened. Shaw agreed to pay Cosby $5,000, remove material about the dispute from his personnel and company files, avoid negative job references, and provide letters confirming his employment dates and jobs. Judge Jacqueline R. Bulluck found the agreement appropriate and in the public interest, ordered compliance within 30 days, and dismissed the case.
Decision snapshot
- Governing provision: 30 U.S.C. § 815(c)(3)
- Outcome: The discrimination settlement was approved, and the case was dismissed.
- Key point: The settlement combined a direct payment with record-clearing and neutral-reference protections for the former employee.
Full text (FMSHRC public release)
FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION
OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGES
1331 PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE, NW, SUITE 520N
WASHINGTON, DC 20004-1710
TELEPHONE: 202-434-9987 / FAX: 202-434-9949
February 14, 2013
WOODROW WILSON COSBY,
Complainant
v.
SHAW MAINTENANCE GROUP,
Respondent
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
DISCRIMINATION PROCEEDING
Docket No. VA 2009-322-DM
NE-MD-09-01
King William
Mine ID 44-06882 4TX
DECISION
Appearances: Woodrow Wilson Cosby, Hayes, Virginia, pro se;
Thomas Benjamin Huggett, Esq., Littler Mendelson, P.C., Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, for Respondent.
Before: Judge Bulluck
This case is before me on a Complaint of Discrimination filed pursuant to section 105(c)(3) of the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977 (“The Act”), 30 U.S.C. § 815(c)(3). The Complainant alleges that Shaw Maintenance Group unlawfully discharged Cosby at the Nestle-Purina site on or about January 9, 2009.
Prior to opening of the record, the parties reached a settlement. I tentatively approved their agreement pending my review of a motion to approve settlement.
I have reviewed the Joint Motion to Approve Settlement and conclude that it is appropriate and in the public interest. Under the terms of the agreement, Respondent is required to take the following actions:
-
Pay directly to Woodrow Wilson Cosby the sum of $5,000.00;
-
Expunge all records maintained by Shaw Maintenance Group in Cosby’s personnel
and company files of all information relating to the matters being litigated herein;
3. If contacted by a prospective employer of Cosby, Shaw Maintenance Group shall not
give Cosby a negative reference regarding his job performance, and shall give such prospective employer only his job title and dates of employment;
4. Provide signed letters on corporate stationary to Cosby which shall state the dates of his employment and the jobs performed for Shaw Maintenance Group.
ORDER
WHEREFORE, the approval of settlement is GRANTED and it is ORDERED that Shaw Maintenance Group comply with the terms of the settlement agreement within 30 days of the date of this decision. Accordingly, this case is DISMISSED.
/s/ Jacqueline R. Bulluck
Jacqueline R. Bulluck
Administrative Law Judge
Distribution:
Woodrow Wilson Cosby, 8416 Little England Road, Hayes, VA 23072
Thomas Benjamin Huggett, Esq., Littler Mendelson, P.C., Three Parkway, 1601 Cherry Street, Suite 1400, Philadelphia, PA 19102-1321
/ss
What applies to your situation today?
This order bound one employer. Ezel checks the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent against your facts, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace