Woodrow Wilson Cosby v. Shaw Maintenance Group
Woodrow Wilson Cosby v. Shaw Maintenance Group (FMSHRC VA 2009-322-DM): Discharge claim settled for payment and employment protections
Apply this to your situation
This order from 2013 bound only the parties to this case; it isn't precedent. Ezel answers your situation under the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent, with citations.
Plain-English summary
Woodrow Wilson Cosby alleged that Shaw Maintenance Group unlawfully discharged him from the Nestle-Purina site under the Mine Act's discrimination provisions. The parties settled before the hearing record opened. Shaw agreed to pay Cosby $5,000, remove material about the dispute from his personnel and company files, avoid negative job references, and provide letters confirming his employment dates and jobs. Judge Jacqueline R. Bulluck found the agreement appropriate and in the public interest, ordered compliance within 30 days, and dismissed the case.
Decision snapshot
- Governing provision: 30 U.S.C. § 815(c)(3)
- Outcome: The discrimination settlement was approved, and the case was dismissed.
- Key point: The settlement combined a direct payment with record-clearing and neutral-reference protections for the former employee.
Full text (FMSHRC public release)
FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION
OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGES
1331 PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE, NW, SUITE 520N
WASHINGTON, DC 20004-1710
TELEPHONE: 202-434-9987 / FAX: 202-434-9949
February 14, 2013
WOODROW WILSON COSBY,
Complainant
v.
SHAW MAINTENANCE GROUP,
Respondent
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
DISCRIMINATION PROCEEDING
Docket No. VA 2009-322-DM
NE-MD-09-01
King William
Mine ID 44-06882 4TX
DECISION
Appearances: Woodrow Wilson Cosby, Hayes, Virginia, pro se;
Thomas Benjamin Huggett, Esq., Littler Mendelson, P.C., Philadelphia,
Pennsylvania, for Respondent.
Before: Judge Bulluck
This case is before me on a Complaint of Discrimination filed pursuant to section
105(c)(3) of the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977 (“The Act”), 30 U.S.C. § 815(c)(3).
The Complainant alleges that Shaw Maintenance Group unlawfully discharged Cosby at the
Nestle-Purina site on or about January 9, 2009.
Prior to opening of the record, the parties reached a settlement. I tentatively approved
their agreement pending my review of a motion to approve settlement.
I have reviewed the Joint Motion to Approve Settlement and conclude that it is
appropriate and in the public interest. Under the terms of the agreement, Respondent is required
to take the following actions:
-
Pay directly to Woodrow Wilson Cosby the sum of $5,000.00;
-
Expunge all records maintained by Shaw Maintenance Group in Cosby’s personnel
and company files of all information relating to the matters being litigated herein;
3. If contacted by a prospective employer of Cosby, Shaw Maintenance Group shall not
give Cosby a negative reference regarding his job performance, and shall give such
prospective employer only his job title and dates of employment;
4. Provide signed letters on corporate stationary to Cosby which shall state the dates of
his employment and the jobs performed for Shaw Maintenance Group.
ORDER
WHEREFORE, the approval of settlement is GRANTED and it is ORDERED that
Shaw Maintenance Group comply with the terms of the settlement agreement within 30 days of
the date of this decision. Accordingly, this case is DISMISSED.
/s/ Jacqueline R. Bulluck
Jacqueline R. Bulluck
Administrative Law Judge
Distribution:
Woodrow Wilson Cosby, 8416 Little England Road, Hayes, VA 23072
Thomas Benjamin Huggett, Esq., Littler Mendelson, P.C., Three Parkway, 1601 Cherry Street,
Suite 1400, Philadelphia, PA 19102-1321
/ss
Get today's answer for your situation
You just read what one judge decided for one employer in 2013, and it binds only those parties. Ezel checks the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent and answers your specific situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.