FMSHRC ALJ decision Docket VA 2008-215 Decided July 10, 2012 Settled Judge Jerold Feldman

Ernest B. Matney, employed by Knox Creek Coal Corp.

Ernest B. Matney, employed by Knox Creek Coal Corp. (FMSHRC VA 2008-215): Individual-liability penalty settled at $2,160

Apply this to your situation

This order from 2012 bound only the parties to this case; it isn't precedent. Ezel answers your situation under the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent, with citations.

Currency note: this decision dates from 2012
The MSHA standards may have been amended, penalty amounts have been adjusted, and later Commission or court decisions may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current compliance advice. Verify the current standard before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or penalty mentioned here.
Final order, not Commission precedent
This decision by a FMSHRC Administrative Law Judge became the final decision of the Commission 40 days after issuance because the Commission did not direct review (30 U.S.C. § 823(d)(1)). It binds the parties but is not binding on the Commission in other cases. The full text below is from the official FMSHRC release.
About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official FMSHRC release. The full text is the Commission's own document.
Read the official release (fmshrc.gov)

Plain-English summary

An earlier ALJ decision found that Knox Creek agent Ernest Matney was not personally liable for inadequate preshift examination and roof-control violations. The Commission reversed in part, holding Matney personally liable for knowingly failing to address readily apparent hazardous roof conditions, and remanded for a civil penalty. It left undisturbed the finding that the Secretary had not proved Matney knew or should have known about a crib built and removed under a sheared roof bolt. The Secretary initially proposed $2,700 for the two violations. On remand, the parties agreed to $2,160 based on Matney's inability to pay the original amount while receiving Social Security disability payments. Judge Jerold Feldman approved the settlement and ordered payment within 40 days.

Decision snapshot

  • Governing provisions: 30 C.F.R. §§ 75.202(a) and 75.360(a)(1); 30 U.S.C. § 820(c)
  • Outcome: The individual-liability penalty was reduced from $2,700 to $2,160 by approved settlement after Commission remand.
  • Key point: Ability to pay may support a reduced individual civil penalty after section 110(c) liability has been established.

Full text (FMSHRC public release)

FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION

FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION

OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGES

601 New Jersey Avenue, N.W., Suite 9500

Washington, D.C. 20001

July 10, 2012

SECRETARY OF LABOR,   

MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH    

ADMINISTRATION (MSHA),  

Petitioner   

v.

ERNEST B. MATNEY, Employed by 

KNOX CREEK COAL CORP., 

Respondent 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

CIVIL PENALTY PROCEEDING

Docket No. VA 2008-215

A.C. No. 44-06804-141359A

Tiller No. 1

DECISION ON REMAND

GRANTING THE SECRETARY’S MOTION

TO APPROVE SETTLEMENT

Appearances:              Lucy C. Chiu, Esq., Office of the Solicitor, U.S. Department of Labor,

Arlington, Virginia, for the Petitioner;

Timothy W. Gresham, Esq., Penn, Stuart & Eskridge, Abingdon, Virginia,

for the Respondent.

Before:                        Judge Feldman

The initial decision in this matter determined that Ernest Matney (“Matney”), as an agent
of Knox Creek Coal Corporation (“Knox Creek”), was not personally liable under section 110(c)
of the Mine Act, 30 U.S.C. § 820(c),

for failing to conduct an adequate preshift examination in
violation of 30 C.F.R. § 75.360(a)(1), and failing to protect personnel from roof and/or rib falls
in violation of 30 C.F.R. § 75.202(a).

31 FMSHRC 1422, 1424, 1438 (Dec. 2009) (ALJ). On April 25, 2012, the Commission reversed the initial determination that Matney was not liable
under section 110(c) for knowingly authorizing Knox Creek’s violations and remanded for the
assessment of a civil penalty. 34 FMSHRC __ (Apr. 2012), slip op. at 11. The Commission
found that Matney was personally liable for failing to address hazardous roof conditions that
were readily apparent. Id. However, the Commission did not disturb the initial finding that the
Secretary failed to demonstrate, by a preponderance of the evidence, that Matney knew, or should
have known, that a crib had been built and then dismantled under a sheared roof bolt. Slip op. at
8, fn. 9. The Secretary initially proposed a civil penalty of $2,700.00 against Matney for the two
subject violations.

The Secretary now has filed a motion for the approval of settlement. Matney has agreed
to pay a total reduced civil penalty of $2,160.00 in satisfaction of the cited violations. The
reduction in penalty is based on Matney’s inability to pay the civil penalty initially proposed
because he is currently a recipient of Social Security disability payments.

I have considered the representations submitted in this matter and I conclude that the
proffered settlement is appropriate under the criteria set forth in Section 110(i) of the Act, with
particular emphasis on the ability to pay criterion. 30 U.S.C. § 820(i). WHEREFORE, the
Secretary’s motion to approve settlement IS GRANTED. Pursuant to the parties’ agreement,
Ernest Matney IS ORDERED to pay the $2,160.00 civil penalty within 40 days of this order in
satisfaction of the two violations at issue.

Upon receipt of timely payment, the captioned civil
penalty matter IS DISMISSED.        

/s/ Jerold Feldman

Jerold Feldman

Administrative Law Judge

Distribution: (Certified Mail)

Lucy C. Chiu, Esq., Office of the Solicitor, U.S. Department of Labor,

1100 Wilson Boulevard, 22nd Floor West, Arlington, VA 22209-2247

Timothy W. Gresham, Esq., Penn, Stuart & Eskridge, 208 E. Main Street,

P.O. 2288, Abingdon, VA 24212

/jel

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read what one judge decided for one employer in 2012, and it binds only those parties. Ezel checks the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.