Ernest B. Matney, employed by Knox Creek Coal Corp.
Ernest B. Matney, employed by Knox Creek Coal Corp. (FMSHRC VA 2008-215): Individual-liability penalty settled at $2,160
Apply this to your situation
This order from 2012 bound only the parties to this case; it isn't precedent. Ezel answers your situation under the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent, with citations.
Plain-English summary
An earlier ALJ decision found that Knox Creek agent Ernest Matney was not personally liable for inadequate preshift examination and roof-control violations. The Commission reversed in part, holding Matney personally liable for knowingly failing to address readily apparent hazardous roof conditions, and remanded for a civil penalty. It left undisturbed the finding that the Secretary had not proved Matney knew or should have known about a crib built and removed under a sheared roof bolt. The Secretary initially proposed $2,700 for the two violations. On remand, the parties agreed to $2,160 based on Matney's inability to pay the original amount while receiving Social Security disability payments. Judge Jerold Feldman approved the settlement and ordered payment within 40 days.
Decision snapshot
- Governing provisions: 30 C.F.R. §§ 75.202(a) and 75.360(a)(1); 30 U.S.C. § 820(c)
- Outcome: The individual-liability penalty was reduced from $2,700 to $2,160 by approved settlement after Commission remand.
- Key point: Ability to pay may support a reduced individual civil penalty after section 110(c) liability has been established.
Full text (FMSHRC public release)
FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION
FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION
OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGES
601 New Jersey Avenue, N.W., Suite 9500
Washington, D.C. 20001
July 10, 2012
SECRETARY OF LABOR,
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH
ADMINISTRATION (MSHA),
Petitioner
v.
ERNEST B. MATNEY, Employed by
KNOX CREEK COAL CORP.,
Respondent
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
CIVIL PENALTY PROCEEDING
Docket No. VA 2008-215
A.C. No. 44-06804-141359A
Tiller No. 1
DECISION ON REMAND
GRANTING THE SECRETARY’S MOTION
TO APPROVE SETTLEMENT
Appearances: Lucy C. Chiu, Esq., Office of the Solicitor, U.S. Department of Labor,
Arlington, Virginia, for the Petitioner;
Timothy W. Gresham, Esq., Penn, Stuart & Eskridge, Abingdon, Virginia,
for the Respondent.
Before: Judge Feldman
The initial decision in this matter determined that Ernest Matney (“Matney”), as an agent
of Knox Creek Coal Corporation (“Knox Creek”), was not personally liable under section 110(c)
of the Mine Act, 30 U.S.C. § 820(c),
for failing to conduct an adequate preshift examination in
violation of 30 C.F.R. § 75.360(a)(1), and failing to protect personnel from roof and/or rib falls
in violation of 30 C.F.R. § 75.202(a).
31 FMSHRC 1422, 1424, 1438 (Dec. 2009) (ALJ). On April 25, 2012, the Commission reversed the initial determination that Matney was not liable
under section 110(c) for knowingly authorizing Knox Creek’s violations and remanded for the
assessment of a civil penalty. 34 FMSHRC __ (Apr. 2012), slip op. at 11. The Commission
found that Matney was personally liable for failing to address hazardous roof conditions that
were readily apparent. Id. However, the Commission did not disturb the initial finding that the
Secretary failed to demonstrate, by a preponderance of the evidence, that Matney knew, or should
have known, that a crib had been built and then dismantled under a sheared roof bolt. Slip op. at
8, fn. 9. The Secretary initially proposed a civil penalty of $2,700.00 against Matney for the two
subject violations.
The Secretary now has filed a motion for the approval of settlement. Matney has agreed
to pay a total reduced civil penalty of $2,160.00 in satisfaction of the cited violations. The
reduction in penalty is based on Matney’s inability to pay the civil penalty initially proposed
because he is currently a recipient of Social Security disability payments.
I have considered the representations submitted in this matter and I conclude that the
proffered settlement is appropriate under the criteria set forth in Section 110(i) of the Act, with
particular emphasis on the ability to pay criterion. 30 U.S.C. § 820(i). WHEREFORE, the
Secretary’s motion to approve settlement IS GRANTED. Pursuant to the parties’ agreement,
Ernest Matney IS ORDERED to pay the $2,160.00 civil penalty within 40 days of this order in
satisfaction of the two violations at issue.
Upon receipt of timely payment, the captioned civil
penalty matter IS DISMISSED.
/s/ Jerold Feldman
Jerold Feldman
Administrative Law Judge
Distribution: (Certified Mail)
Lucy C. Chiu, Esq., Office of the Solicitor, U.S. Department of Labor,
1100 Wilson Boulevard, 22nd Floor West, Arlington, VA 22209-2247
Timothy W. Gresham, Esq., Penn, Stuart & Eskridge, 208 E. Main Street,
P.O. 2288, Abingdon, VA 24212
/jel
Get today's answer for your situation
You just read what one judge decided for one employer in 2012, and it binds only those parties. Ezel checks the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent and answers your specific situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.