Michigan Potash Operating, LLC (Board decision, July 30, 2025)

In re Michigan Potash Operating, LLC (EAB UIC Appeal No. 25-02): petition dismissed as moot

Decision type
Board decision
Docket
UIC 25-02
Decided
July 30, 2025
Outcome
Procedural
Precedential status
Citable Board precedent
Checked against source
2026-08-21

Apply this precedent to your situation

This is citable Board precedent from 2025, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.

Final EAB decision
This Environmental Appeals Board order is a final disposition of the appeal. The Board dismissed the petition for review as moot after EPA Region 5 withdrew the captioned permits in their entirety under 40 C.F.R. § 124.19(j). The full text below is the official EPA release.
About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official EPA EAB release. The full text is the agency's own release.
Read the official release (epa.gov)

Plain-English summary

Michigan Potash Operating, LLC held six Underground Injection Control permits issued by EPA Region 5. On July 29, 2025, EPA Region 5 notified the Environmental Appeals Board that it was unilaterally withdrawing the permits in their entirety under 40 C.F.R. § 124.19(j). Because the withdrawal eliminated the live dispute, the Board dismissed the petition for review as moot. The order did not decide the merits of the permit challenge.

Decision snapshot

  • Cited authorities: 40 C.F.R. § 124.19(j)
  • Outcome: The petition for review was dismissed as moot after EPA Region 5 withdrew the six captioned permits.
  • Key point: Withdrawal of the challenged permits can eliminate the live dispute and end an EAB appeal without a merits decision.

Full text (EPA EAB public release)

                                                                        F I L E D
                                                                            Jul 30, 2025
                                                                       Clerk, Environmental Appeals Board
                                                                       INITIALS ________________________
                 ENVIRONMENTAL APPEALS BOARD
        UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
                        WASHINGTON, D.C.


                                            )

In re Michigan Potash Operating, LLC )
) UIC Appeal No. 25-02
Permit Nos. MI-133-1I-0004, MI-133-1I- ) 0005, MI-133-1I-0006, MI-133-1I-0007, ) MI-133-1I-0009, and MI-107-1I-0005 )
)

           ORDER DISMISSING PETITION FOR REVIEW AS MOOT

   On July 29, 2025, EPA Region 5 notified the Board that it is unilaterally withdrawing the

captioned permits issued to Michigan Potash Operating, LLC in their entirety pursuant to

40 C.F.R. § 124.19(j). In light of this withdrawal, the Board dismisses the petition for review in

this matter as moot.

   So ordered.1


                                                 ENVIRONMENTAL APPEALS BOARD

Dated: July 30, 2025 By: ________
Ammie Roseman-Orr
Environmental Appeals Judge

   1
    The three-member panel deciding this matter is composed of Environmental Appeals

Judges Aaron P. Avila, Mary Kay Lynch, and Ammie Roseman-Orr. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

   I certify that copies of the foregoing Order Dismissing Petition for Review as Moot in the

matter of Michigan Potash Operating, LLC, UIC Appeal No. 25-02, were sent to the following persons in the manner indicated:

By Email:

Counsel for Petitioner: Counsel for EPA: Carrie La Seur Mark Koller Flow Water Advocates Associate Regional Counsel [email protected] Office of Regional Counsel
U.S. EPA, Region 5
Counsel for Permittee: [email protected] Brent Chicken Steptoe & Johnson PLLC Dawn Messier [email protected] Acting Associate General Counsel
Office of General Counsel
Skipp Kropp Water Law Office Steptoe & Johnson PLLC [email protected] [email protected]
Carrie Wehling
Dallas Kratzer Assistant General Counsel Steptoe & Johnson PLLC Office of General Counsel [email protected] Water Law Office
[email protected]

      Jul 30, 2025

Dated: ____ ______
Tommie Madison
Clerk of the Board

Does this precedent still control your case?

Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and applies it to your situation with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace