Bickford, Inc. (Board decision, November 4, 1997)
In re Bickford, Inc. (EAB TSCA Appeal No. 95-7): appeal withdrawn and dismissed
Apply this precedent to your situation
This is citable Board precedent from 1997, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.
Plain-English summary
EPA Region V moved to withdraw its appeal because it determined that continuing the appeal was no longer in the Agency's best interest in light of the EAB's decision in In re Lazarus, Inc. The Board found good cause, granted the motion, and dismissed the appeal. The October 18, 1995 Initial Decision became the Board's final order, and Bickford was directed to pay the penalty assessed in that decision.
Decision snapshot
- Cited authorities: None stated in the decision.
- Outcome: EPA's appeal was withdrawn and dismissed; the ALJ's Initial Decision became the final order of the Board.
- Key point: Withdrawal of the appeal left the ALJ's penalty decision as the final order.
Full text (EPA EAB public release)
BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENTAL APPEALS BOARD
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY WASHINGTON, D.C.
In the Matter of:
Bickford, Inc.
TSCA Appeal No. 95-7
Docket No. TSCA-V-C-6052-92
ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL
On November 3, 1997, U.S. EPA Region V filed a Motion to
Withdraw Appeal in the above-captioned matter. The Region states
that it "has determined that pursuit of the appeal is no longer in
the best interest of the Agency" in light of the Environmental
Appeals Board's decision in In re Lazarus, Inc., TSCA Appeal No.
95-2 (EAB, Sept. 30, 1997), 7 E.A.D. ___ .
For good cause shown, the Region's Motion to Withdraw Appeal
is granted and the appeal in this matter is hereby dismissed. As
of the date of this Order Dismissing Appeal, the October 18, 1995
Initial Decision of Administrative Law Judge Vanderheyden shall
become the final order of the Board. Respondent must remit
payment for the penalty assessed in accordance with the Initial
Decision.
So ordered.
ENVIRONMENTAL APPEALS BOARD
By: [illegible signature]
Kathie A. Stein
Environmental Appeals Judge
Dated:
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that copies of the foregoing Order
Dismissing Appeal in the Matter of Bickford, Inc., TSCA Appeal
No. 95-7, were sent to the following persons in the manner
indicated.
Certified Mail
Fred D. Hollenbeck
Return Receipt Requested Curran, Hollenbeck & Orton
(and copy by facsimile)
111 Oak Street
P.O. Box 140
Mauston, WI 53948
(608) 847-4155 (fax)
Robert Guenther
Assistant Regional Counsel
U.S. EPA - Region V
77 West Jackson Boulevard
(CA-29A)
Chicago, IL 60604-3590
(312) 353-8937 (fax)
Dated: NOV 4 1997
Mildred T. Johnson
Secretary
Does this precedent still control your case?
Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and applies it to your situation with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace