Bickford, Inc. (Board decision, November 4, 1997)

In re Bickford, Inc. (EAB TSCA Appeal No. 95-7): appeal withdrawn and dismissed

Decision type
Board decision
Dockets
TSCA 95-7, TSCA-V-C-6052-92
Decided
November 4, 1997
Outcome
Procedural
Precedential status
Citable Board precedent
Checked against source
2026-08-23

Apply this precedent to your situation

This is citable Board precedent from 1997, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.

Currency note: this decision dates from 1997
The EPA regulations may have been amended, penalty amounts have been adjusted, and later Board or court decisions may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current compliance advice. Verify the current standard before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or penalty mentioned here.
Final EAB decision
This Environmental Appeals Board order is a final disposition of the TSCA appeal. The Board granted EPA Region V's motion to withdraw the appeal, dismissed the appeal, and made the ALJ's October 18, 1995 Initial Decision the final order of the Board. The full text below is the official EPA release, transcribed from a scanned PDF with OCR proofreading.
About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official EPA EAB release. The full text is the agency's own release.
Transcribed from a scanned original: EPA EAB released this decision as an image-only file. The full text below is a machine transcription, proofread against the scan. Check the official release before quoting exact language.
Read the official release (epa.gov)

Plain-English summary

EPA Region V moved to withdraw its appeal because it determined that continuing the appeal was no longer in the Agency's best interest in light of the EAB's decision in In re Lazarus, Inc. The Board found good cause, granted the motion, and dismissed the appeal. The October 18, 1995 Initial Decision became the Board's final order, and Bickford was directed to pay the penalty assessed in that decision.

Decision snapshot

  • Cited authorities: None stated in the decision.
  • Outcome: EPA's appeal was withdrawn and dismissed; the ALJ's Initial Decision became the final order of the Board.
  • Key point: Withdrawal of the appeal left the ALJ's penalty decision as the final order.

Full text (EPA EAB public release)

BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENTAL APPEALS BOARD
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY WASHINGTON, D.C.

In the Matter of:
Bickford, Inc.
TSCA Appeal No. 95-7
Docket No. TSCA-V-C-6052-92

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

On November 3, 1997, U.S. EPA Region V filed a Motion to

Withdraw Appeal in the above-captioned matter. The Region states

that it "has determined that pursuit of the appeal is no longer in

the best interest of the Agency" in light of the Environmental

Appeals Board's decision in In re Lazarus, Inc., TSCA Appeal No.

95-2 (EAB, Sept. 30, 1997), 7 E.A.D. ___ .

For good cause shown, the Region's Motion to Withdraw Appeal

is granted and the appeal in this matter is hereby dismissed. As

of the date of this Order Dismissing Appeal, the October 18, 1995

Initial Decision of Administrative Law Judge Vanderheyden shall

become the final order of the Board. Respondent must remit

payment for the penalty assessed in accordance with the Initial

Decision.

So ordered.

ENVIRONMENTAL APPEALS BOARD

By: [illegible signature]
Kathie A. Stein
Environmental Appeals Judge
Dated:

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that copies of the foregoing Order

Dismissing Appeal in the Matter of Bickford, Inc., TSCA Appeal

No. 95-7, were sent to the following persons in the manner

indicated.

Certified Mail
Fred D. Hollenbeck
Return Receipt Requested Curran, Hollenbeck & Orton
(and copy by facsimile)
111 Oak Street
P.O. Box 140
Mauston, WI 53948
(608) 847-4155 (fax)

Robert Guenther
Assistant Regional Counsel
U.S. EPA - Region V
77 West Jackson Boulevard
(CA-29A)
Chicago, IL 60604-3590
(312) 353-8937 (fax)

Dated: NOV 4 1997
Mildred T. Johnson
Secretary

Does this precedent still control your case?

Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and applies it to your situation with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace