Lake City Paint Inc. (Board decision, January 26, 2026)

In re Lake City Paint Inc. (EAB TSCA Appeal No. 26-01Q): quick-resolution penalty paid and matter resolved

Decision type
Board decision
Docket
TSCA 26-01Q
Decided
January 26, 2026
Outcome
Procedural
Precedential status
Citable Board precedent
Checked against source
2026-08-21

Apply this precedent to your situation

This is citable Board precedent from 2026, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.

Final EAB decision
This Environmental Appeals Board Final Order is a final disposition of the enforcement proceeding. The Board resolved the matter after Lake City Paint Inc. paid the $14,000 penalty proposed in EPA’s complaint under the quick-resolution procedure. The full text below is the official EPA release.
About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official EPA EAB release. The full text is the agency's own release.
Read the official release (epa.gov)

Plain-English summary

EPA filed a complaint against Lake City Paint Inc. on January 7, 2026, alleging violations of the Methylene Chloride Rule under the Toxic Substances Control Act. The complaint sought a $14,000 penalty. Lake City Paint paid the full penalty, and EPA notified the EAB on January 23 that payment had been received. Under 40 C.F.R. § 22.18(a)(3), payment waived the company’s rights to contest the complaint’s allegations and appeal the Final Order, so the Board resolved the matter.

Decision snapshot

  • Cited authorities: Toxic Substances Control Act; Methylene Chloride Rule; 40 C.F.R. parts 22 and 751; 15 U.S.C. § 2601
  • Outcome: The EAB resolved the enforcement matter after Lake City Paint paid the full $14,000 penalty.
  • Key point: A respondent may obtain quick resolution of an EPA enforcement proceeding by paying the complaint’s proposed penalty, subject to the rule’s waiver and final-order requirements.

Full text (EPA EAB public release)

                                                                      F I L E D
                                                                          Jan 26, 2026
                                                                     Clerk, Environmental Appeals Board
                                                                     INITIALS ________________________
                 ENVIRONMENTAL APPEALS BOARD
        UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
                        WASHINGTON, D.C.


                                            )
                                            )
                                            )

In re Lake City Paint Inc. Docket No. TSCA-HQ-2025-5017
)
)
)
)

                                     FINAL ORDER


                                     January 26, 2026




   Before Environmental Appeals Judges Aaron P. Avila and Ammie Roseman-Orr

   Order of the Board by Judge Roseman-Orr:

   On January 7, 2026, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (“EPA’s”) Waste and

Chemical Enforcement Division, Office of Civil Enforcement, Office of Enforcement and

Compliance Assurance, filed a complaint against Lake City Paint Inc. (“Respondent”) alleging

that Respondent had violated the Methylene Chloride Rule promulgated at 40 C.F.R. § 751.101

et seq. under the Toxic Substances Control Act (“TSCA”), 15 U.S.C. § 2601 et seq. The

Complaint sought a penalty of $14,000.

   EPA’s Consolidated Rules of Practice, codified at 40 C.F.R. part 22, govern this

administrative enforcement proceeding. Pursuant to 40 C.F.R. § 22.18(a), a respondent may opt

for a quick resolution of an enforcement proceeding at any time by paying the penalty proposed

in the complaint. See 40 C.F.R. § 22.18(a)(1)-(2). The rules further provide that upon payment
in full of the penalty, in cases initiated at EPA Headquarters, the Environmental Appeals Board

must issue a final order. 40 C.F.R. § 22.18(a)(3).

   On January 23, 2026, EPA’s Office of Enforcement and Compliance Assurance notified

the Board that EPA has received full payment of the penalty ($14,000) from Respondent to

resolve the above-captioned matter. Payment by Respondent constituted a waiver of

Respondent’s rights to contest the allegations in the Complaint and to appeal this Final Order.

See 40 C.F.R. § 22.18(a)(3). In accordance with 40 C.F.R. § 22.18(a)(3), the above-captioned

matter is hereby RESOLVED.

   So ordered.




                                             2

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

   I certify that copies of the foregoing Final Order in the matter of Lake City Paint Inc.,

Docket No. TSCA-HQ-2025-5017, were sent to the following persons on January 26, 2026, in
the manner indicated:

By E-mail:

N. Lindsay Simmons
Senior Counsel
Waste and Chemical Enforcement Division
Office of Civil Enforcement
[email protected]

Headquarters Hearing Clerk
Office of Administrative Law Judges
[email protected]

David A. Rockman
Outside Counsel
Eckert Seamans
[email protected]

                                                                        Digitally signed by
                                                                        TOMMIE MADISON
                                                                        Date: 2026.01.26
                                                                        15:05:46 -05'00'
                                                             Tommie Madison
                                                             Clerk of the Board

Does this precedent still control your case?

Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and applies it to your situation with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace