LG Energy Solution Michigan, Inc. (Board decision, November 8, 2022)

In re LG Energy Solution Michigan, Inc. (EAB TSCA 22-05C): chemical-import settlement approved

Decision type
Board decision
Dockets
TSCA 22-05C, TSCA-HQ-2023-5001
Decided
November 8, 2022
Outcome
Settled
Precedential status
Citable Board precedent
Checked against source
2026-08-21

Apply this precedent to your situation

This is citable Board precedent from 2022, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.

Final EAB decision
This Environmental Appeals Board Final Order is a final disposition of the enforcement proceeding. The Board ratified the Consent Agreement and ordered LG Energy Solution Michigan, Inc. to comply with its terms, including a $327,334 civil penalty and interim controls on the processing, use, and distribution of existing chemical stocks.
About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official EPA EAB release. The full text is the agency's own release.
Read the official release (epa.gov)

Plain-English summary

LG Energy Solution Michigan, Inc. voluntarily disclosed potential TSCA noncompliance involving a confidential chemical substance. The company had submitted a low-volume exemption and later a Premanufacture Notice using a CASRN that EPA determined did not identify the imported chemical, and EPA alleged that the company imported the chemical without the required notice and certification and used existing stock after disclosure. The parties settled without adjudicating the factual or legal issues. The EAB approved a $327,334 civil penalty and conditions limiting how the existing stock could be processed, used, and distributed while EPA completed a TSCA section 5(e) Consent Order.

Decision snapshot

  • Cited authorities: TSCA sections 5, 13, 15, and 16; 15 U.S.C. §§ 2604, 2612, 2614, and 2615; 40 C.F.R. §§ 22.18, 707.20, and 720
  • Outcome: The Consent Agreement was ratified, LG Energy Solution Michigan, Inc. was ordered to comply with its terms, and a $327,334 civil penalty was approved.
  • Key point: A self-disclosure settlement can impose a penalty and interim controls when a company imported and used a new chemical substance before completing the required TSCA process.

Full text (EPA EAB public release)

                                                                       F I L E D
                                                                           Nov 08, 2022
                                                                      Clerk, Environmental Appeals Board
                                                  INITIALS ________________________
                    ENVIRONMENTAL APPEALS BOARD
           UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
                           WASHINGTON, D.C.

                                           )

In re: )
) Docket No. TSCA-HQ-2023-5001
LG Energy Solution Michigan, Inc. )
)
)
)

                                   FINAL ORDER

   Pursuant to 40 C.F.R. § 22.18(b)-(c) of EPA’s Consolidated Rules of Practice, the

attached Consent Agreement resolving this matter is incorporated by reference into this Final Order and is hereby ratified.

    The Respondent is ORDERED to comply with all terms of the Consent Agreement,

effective immediately.

      So ordered. 1

                                                ENVIRONMENTAL APPEALS BOARD

       

Dated: ____ ______
Mary Kay Lynch
Environmental Appeals Judge

      1
    The three-member panel ratifying this matter is composed of Environmental Appeals

Judges Aaron P. Avila, Wendy L. Blake, and Mary Kay Lynch.
BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENTAL APPEALS BOARD
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
WASHINGTON, D.C.


                           )

In the Matter of: )
)
LG Energy Solution ) Docket No. TSCA-HQ-2023-5001 Michigan Inc. ) Holland, MI )
)
Respondent )
_______)

                                CONSENT AGREEMENT

   Complainant, United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA or Agency), and

Respondent, LG Energy Solution Michigan, Inc. (LGESMI) (collectively, the Parties), having consented to the entry of this Consent Agreement and proposed Final Order before the taking of any testimony and without adjudication of any issues of law or fact, consent to the terms of this Consent Agreement and attached Final Order.

                           I.      PRELIMINARY STATEMENT
  1. This civil administrative proceeding for the assessment of penalties pursuant to section 16(a) of
    the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA), 15 U.S.C. § 2615(a), as amended by the Frank R. Lautenberg Chemical Safety for the 21st Century Act, Pub. L. No. 114-182, June 22, 2016, 130 Stat. 448, is being simultaneously commenced and concluded pursuant to the Consolidated Rules of Practice Governing the Administrative Assessment of Civil Penalties, Issuance of Compliance or Corrective Action Orders, and the Revocation, Termination or Suspension of Permits (Consolidated Rules of Practice), 40 C.F.R. Part 22.

  2. On or about July 18, 2022, Respondent voluntarily disclosed to EPA potential noncompliance
    with TSCA requirements of a manufactured (imported) chemical substance. Respondent has claimed the identity of the chemical as confidential business information (CBI), which is herein referred to as Chemical A.

  3. EPA has determined that Respondent’s voluntary self-disclosure, described in Counts I, II, and
    III, qualifies for reductions applicable under the TSCA Section 5 Enforcement Response Policy, issued August 5, 1988, as amended June 8, 1989, and July 1, 1993 (TSCA ERP).

  4. Respondent identified the potential noncompliance with TSCA requirements through a
    compliance audit, which was supervised by external counsel with a technical consultant, and which remains ongoing and is expected to be concluded by November 30, 2022. 5. On May 18, 2015, Respondent submitted a Low Volume Exemption (LVE) for Chemical A with a Chemical Abstract Service Registry Number (CASRN) provided by a third party, which the Agency later determined was not the CASRN of the manufactured (or imported) chemical.

  5. On May 27, 2021, Respondent submitted a Premanufacture Notice (PMN) for Chemical A with a
    CASRN provided by a third party, which the Agency later determined was not the CASRN of the manufactured (or imported) chemical.

  6. On November 15, 2021, Respondent amended the CASRN in the PMN for Chemical A based on
    new information regarding the chemical identity.

  7. To avoid the disruption of orderly business activities and the expense of protracted and costly
    litigation, Respondent, for purposes of this proceeding only and as required by 40 C.F.R.
    § 22.18(b)(2):

    a. admits the following jurisdictional allegations and waives any defenses to
    jurisdiction:

                i.          Respondent is a corporation located at 1 LG Way, Holland, MI 49423
                     and is a “person” as defined in 40 C.F.R. § 720.3(x) and, as such, is subject to
                     TSCA and its regulations: and
    
                ii.         Respondent manufactures (imports), processes, and distributes in
                   commerce, Chemical A or mixtures containing this chemical, or in the past has
                   manufactured (imported) processed, and distributed in commerce Chemical A
                   or mixtures containing this chemical as those terms are defined in sections 3(2),
                   (5), (9), (10), and (13) of TSCA, 15 U.S.C. § 2602(2), (5), (9), (10), and (13)
                   respectively, and 40 C.F.R. § 720.3(e), (i), (q), (u), and (aa). Respondent is
                   subject to TSCA, and the regulations promulgated thereunder
    

    b. neither admits nor denies the specific factual allegations contained herein;

    c. consents to the assessment of a civil penalty on the terms discussed below;

    d. consents to any conditions specified in this Consent Agreement;

    e. waives any right to contest the alleged violations of law set forth herein; and

    f. waives the rights to appeal the proposed Final Order accompanying this Consent
    Agreement.
    II. EPA'S FINDINGS OF FACT AND LAW

                           COUNT I – TSCA § 5(a)(1) VIOLATIONS
    
  8. Any chemical substance which is not included in the chemical substance list compiled and
    published under section 8(b) of TSCA, 15 U.S.C. § 2607(b) (“TSCA Inventory”), is a “new chemical substance” as defined under section 3(11) of TSCA, 15 U.S.C. § 2602 (11) and 40 C.F.R. § 720.3(v).

  9. Section 5(a)(l) of TSCA, 15 U.S.C. §2604(a)(1), and 40 C.F.R. §§ 720.22(a)(1) and 720.40(b),
    provide that no person may manufacture (import) a new chemical substance unless such person
    submits a PMN to EPA at least ninety (90) calendar days before manufacturing that substance.

  10. On July 18, 2022, August 4, 2022, and August 17, 2022, Respondent voluntarily informed EPA
    that it had manufactured (imported) Chemical A between 2017 and 2022 (with relevant dates and
    quantities claimed as CBI).

  11. Chemical A was not included on the TSCA Inventory at the time of import and therefore is a
    “new chemical substance” as defined under section 3(11) of TSCA, 15 U.S.C. § 2602(11), and
    40 C.F.R. § 720.3(v).

  12. Respondent’s failure to submit a PMN at least ninety (90) days before manufacturing (importing)
    Chemical A constitutes a failure to comply with section 5 of TSCA, 15 U.S.C. § 2604, which is a
    prohibited act under section 15(1) of TSCA, 15 U.S.C. § 2614(1), and may subject an entity to
    civil penalties pursuant section 16(a) of TSCA, 15 U.S.C. § 2615(a).

                     COUNT II – TSCA § 13(a)(1)(B) VIOLATIONS
    
  13. Section 13(a)(1)(B) of TSCA, 15 U.S.C. § 2612(a)(1)(B), provides that the Treasury shall refuse
    entry of “any chemical substance or mixture offered for such entry if” it is offered for entry in
    violation of a rule or order under section 5, 15 U.S.C. § 2604. Pursuant to 40 C.F.R.
    § 707.20(b)(2)(i), importers must sign the following statement for each import of a chemical
    substance subject to TSCA: “I certify that all chemical substances in this shipment comply with
    all applicable rules or orders under TSCA and that I am not offering a chemical substance for
    entry in violation of TSCA or any applicable rule or order under TSCA.”

  14. On July 18, 2022, August 4, 2022, and August 17, 2022, Respondent voluntarily informed EPA
    that it had imported Chemical A between 2017 and 2022 (with relevant dates claimed CBI).

  15. Respondent’s failure to submit proper certifications under section 13 of TSCA prior to importing
    Chemical A constitutes a failure to comply with section 13 of TSCA, which is a prohibited act
    under section 15(3)(B) of TSCA, 15 U.S.C. § 2614(3)(B), and may subject an entity to civil
    penalties pursuant to section 16(a) of TSCA, 15 U.S.C. § 2615(a).
    COUNT III – TSCA § 15(2) VIOLATIONS

  16. Paragraphs 11 and 12 are incorporated and realleged herein.

  17. TSCA section 15(2) states: “[i]t shall be unlawful for any person to— (2) use for commercial
    purposes a chemical substance or mixture which such person knew or had reason to know was
    manufactured, processed, or distributed in commerce in violation of section 2604[.]”

  18. On July 18, 2022 and August 4, 2022, and as later clarified, Respondent voluntarily informed
    EPA that it used existing stock of the product containing Chemical A on at least 30 days in 2022
    (with dates and quantities claimed as CBI).

  19. Respondent's use of existing stock of Chemical A after the disclosure date, constitutes a
    violation of TSCA section 15(2), 15 U.S.C. § 2614(2)) which may subject an entity to civil
    penalties pursuant to section 16(a) of TSCA, 15 U.S.C. § 2615(a).

                              III.        CIVIL PENALTY
    
  20. To avoid the disruption of orderly business activities and the expense of protracted and costly
    litigation, both Parties agree that the penalty for any and all allegations discussed within this
    Consent Agreement is $327,334. The penalty is consistent with the TSCA ERP. The TSCA ERP
    was developed in accordance with the Guidelines for Assessment of Civil Penalties Under
    Section 16 of the Toxic Substances Control Act; PCB Penalty Policy, which sets forth a general
    penalty assessment policy for TSCA violations. 45 Fed. Reg. 59,770 (Sept. 10, 1980) (Penalty
    Policy). The TSCA ERP establishes a framework for applying the statutory factors to be
    considered in assessing a civil penalty, i.e.: “the nature, circumstances, extent and gravity of the
    violation or violations and, with respect to the violator, ability to pay, effect on ability to
    continue to do business, any history of prior such violations, the degree of culpability, and such
    other matters as justice may require.” 15 U.S.C. § 2615(a)(2)(B).

  21. The agreed upon civil penalty in this case reflects: (1) a determination of the Gravity-based
    Penalty (GBP); and (2) adjustments to the GBP, taking into account the statutory factors.

  22. Not more than thirty (30) calendar days after the effective date of the Final Order, Respondent
    shall

Either:

  1. Dispatch a cashier’s or certified check in the amount of $327,334 made payable to the order of
    the "Treasurer of the United States of America," and bearing the case docket number TSCA HQ-
    2023-5001, to the following address:
    U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
    Fines and Penalties
    Cincinnati Finance Center
    PO Box 979077
    St. Louis, MO 63197-9000
    Or

  2. Effect a wire transfer in the amount of $327,334 with the notation “LG Energy Solution
    Michigan, Inc. Civil Penalty Docket No. TSCA-2023-5001,” by using the following
    instructions:

                   Federal Reserve Bank of New York
                   ABA = 021030004
                   Account = 68010727
                   SWIFT address = FRNYUS33
                   33 Liberty Street
                   New York, NY 10045
      [Field Tag 4200 of the Fedwire message should read “D 68010727 Environmental Protection Agency.”]
    
  3. Respondent shall forward a copy of the check or documentation of a wire
    transfer to:

                   Tony R. Ellis, Case Development Officer
                   Waste and Chemical Enforcement Division (2249A)
                   U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
                   1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW (Room No. 2119C)
                   Washington, DC 20460
                   (202) 564-4167
    
                   Or as a PDF attachment in an email to: [email protected]
    
  4. Pursuant to 31 U.S.C. § 3717 and 40 C.F.R. § 13.11, unless otherwise prohibited by law, EPA
    will assess interest and late payment penalties on debts owed to the United States and a charge to
    cover the costs of processing and handling the delinquent claim. Interest on the civil penalty
    assessed in this CAFO will begin to accrue thirty (30) days after the effective date and will be
    recovered by EPA on any amount of the civil penalty that is not paid by the respective due date.
    In accordance with 31 U.S.C. § 3717 and 40 C.F.R. § 13.11, Respondent must pay the following
    amounts on any amount overdue:

       c. Interest. Any unpaid portion of a civil penalty must bear interest at the rate
          established by the Secretary of the Treasury pursuant to 31 U.S.C. § 3717(a)(1).
          Interest will therefore begin to accrue on a civil penalty or stipulated penalty if it is
          not paid by the last date required. Interest will be assessed at the rate of the United
          States Treasury tax and loan rate in accordance with 40 C.F.R. § 13.11(a).
    
       d. Monthly Handling Charge. Respondent must pay a late payment handling charge of
          FIFTEEN dollars ($15.00) on any late payment, with an additional charge of FIFTEEN
          dollars ($15.00) for each subsequent thirty (30) day period over which an unpaid
          balance remains.
    
       e. Non-payment Penalty. On any portion of a civil penalty more than ninety (90) days
          past due, Respondent must pay a non-payment penalty charge of six percent (6%) per
    

    annum, which will accrue from the date the penalty payment became due and is not
    paid. 40 C.F.R. § 13.11(c). This non-payment penalty charge is in addition to charges
    which accrue or may accrue under subparagraphs (a) and (b).

                            IV.     TERMS OF SETTLEMENT
    
  5. Respondent’s full compliance with this Consent Agreement shall only resolve Respondent’s
    liability for federal civil penalties for the violations and facts alleged in this Consent Agreement.

  6. This settlement is conditioned upon the thoroughness and accuracy of Respondent's submissions
    to EPA in this matter.

  7. As a condition of this Agreement, Respondent may process, use, and distribute its existing stocks
    of Chemical A while EPA and Respondent finalize a TSCA section 5(e) Consent Order for
    Chemical A. The processing, use, and distribution of the existing stocks must be in accordance
    with the following:

       a. Terms of Processing/Use. Respondent may process/use Chemical A only:
               i. at its Holland, Michigan facility;
              ii. as an electrode material for use in the manufacture of batteries;
            iii. where fugitive air emissions are captured and controlled in the facility’s
                  vacuum dust collection system; and
             iv. until December 31, 2022, or until its existing stocks have been used.
    
       b. No Release to Water. The Respondent is prohibited from any release of Chemical A,
    

    or any waste stream containing Chemical A, into water.
    i. If for any reason the Respondent fails to comply with the release limitations
    applicable to Chemical A, the Company shall notify EPA, in writing, within 5
    days of the release.
    ii. The notification must include the location of the release, an explanation and
    description of the reasons for the release, the amount of the release or
    deviation, all actions taken or to be taken to prevent or minimize the release
    and future release, and a schedule for implementation of any measures to be
    taken to prevent or mitigate effects of the release and any future releases.

       c. Respiratory Protection
             i. Respondent must ensure that each person subject to inhalation is provided
                 with, and is required to wear, a National Institute for Occupational Safety and
                 Health (NIOSH)-certified Combination Particulate and Gas/Vapor respirator
                 with an Assigned Protection Factor (APF) of 50.
             ii. All respirators must be issued, used and maintained according to an
                 appropriate respiratory protection program in accordance with Occupational
                 Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) and NIOSH respiratory protection
                 requirements in 29 C.F.R. § 1910.134 and 42 C.F.R. part 84.
    

    d. Dermal Personal Protective Equipment
    i. The Respondent must ensure that each employee reasonably likely to be
    dermally exposed through direct handling or contact with equipment or
    surfaces containing or contaminated with Chemical A is provided with, and is
    required to wear, personal protective equipment (“PPE”) (i.e., gloves and
    body suits) that provides a barrier to prevent dermal exposure.
    ii. PPE must be selected and used in accordance with the OSHA’s requirements
    at 29 C.F.R. §§ 1910.132, 1910.133, and 1910.138.
    iii. Gloves must be replaced at the end of each work shift during which they are
    exposed to Chemical A. If permeation testing was used to establish
    impermeability, gloves may not be used for longer than for which they were
    tested.
    iv. Demonstration of Imperviousness. The Respondent must demonstrate that the
    PPE selected provides an impervious barrier to prevent dermal exposure
    during expected duration and conditions of exposure. The Respondent may
    make this demonstration by any one or a combination of the following:

                      1.    Permeation Testing. PPE must be tested alone and in combination
                           with other chemical substances in the work area under the expected
                           conditions of exposure. Permeation testing should be conducted
                           according to the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM)
                           F739 “Standard Test Method for Permeation of Liquids and Gases
                           through Protective Clothing Materials under Conditions of Continuous
                           Contact.” Results must be reported as the cumulative permeation rate
                           as a function of time and documented in accordance with ASTM F739
                           using the format specified in ASTM F1194-99 (2010) “Standard Guide
                           for Documenting the Results of Chemical Permeation Testing of
                           Materials Used in Protective Clothing Materials.”
    
                      2. Manufacturer Specifications. Manufacturer specifications may be used
                         to establish that the PPE is impervious to Chemical A, alone and in
                         combination with other chemical substances in the work area under the
                         expected conditions of exposure.
    
  8. Respondent shall maintain records documenting compliance with Paragraph 30 for 5 years after
    the date they are created and must produce them for inspection, copying or as otherwise required
    under Section 11 of TSCA, 15 U.S.C. § 2610.

  9. Respondent shall submit a monthly status report on its use of its existing stocks via EPA’s
    Central Data Exchange on the 1st of each month until the existing stocks of Chemical A are
    completely used.

  10. Respondent shall implement policies and procedures to promote compliance with TSCA sections
    4, 5, 6, 8, 12, 13, and 15(2), which will include appropriate training for staff, following
    completion of the ongoing compliance audit referenced in Paragraph 4.
    34. Compliance with this Consent Agreement and Final Order shall not be a defense to any
    subsequent action EPA may commence pursuant to federal law or regulation for violations
    occurring after the date of this Consent Agreement, or any violations of TSCA not alleged in this
    Consent Agreement that may have occurred prior to the date that this Consent Agreement is fully
    executed by both Parties.

  11. Nothing in this Consent Agreement or the Final Order is intended to, nor shall be construed to,
    operate in any way to resolve any criminal liability of Respondent.

  12. By executing this Consent Agreement, Respondent certifies that, to the best of its knowledge
    regarding the violations alleged herein, Respondent is in compliance with TSCA sections 5, 13
    and 15, 15 U.S.C. §§ 2604, 2612 and 2614.

                                  V.      OTHER MATTERS
    
  13. Subject to the terms and conditions herein, this Consent Agreement shall be binding upon the
    Parties, and their respective officers, directors, employees, successors, and assigns. The
    undersigned representative of each Party certifies that he or she is duly authorized by his or her
    respective Party to sign this Consent Agreement.

  14. This Consent Agreement shall take full effect upon signing and filing of the Final Order by
    EPA’s Environmental Appeals Board.

  15. Respondent’s obligations under this Consent Agreement shall end when it has paid in full the
    scheduled civil penalty, paid any stipulated penalties, and submitted documentation required by
    the Consent Agreement and Final Order.

  16. All the terms and conditions of this Consent Agreement together comprise one settlement
    agreement, and each of the terms and conditions is in consideration for all the other terms and
    conditions. This Consent Agreement shall be null and void if any term or condition of this
    Consent Agreement is held invalid or is not executed by all the signatory parties in identical form
    or is not approved in such identical form by the EPA Environmental Appeals Board.

  17. The penalty, including any stipulated penalties specified above, represents civil penalties
    assessed by EPA, and shall not be deductible for purposes of federal taxes.

  18. Failure of Respondent to remit the civil penalties provided herein will result in this matter being
    forwarded to the United States Department of Justice for collection.

  19. The Parties agree to bear their own costs and attorney’s fees.
    WE AGREE TO THIS:


Andrew R. Stewart, Attorney
Sidley Austin LLP
Counsel for
LG Energy Solution Michigan, Inc.

Date: _______
WE AGREE TO THIS:

_____ _______ Gregory Sullivan, Director James Miles, Attorney Waste and Chemical Enforcement Division Waste and Chemical Enforcement Division Office of Civil Enforcement Office of Civil Enforcement Office of Enforcement and Compliance Assurance Office of Enforcement and Compliance United States Environmental Protection Agency Assurance
United States Environmental Protection Agency

Date: ____ Date: _____ CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

    I certify that copies of the foregoing “Consent Agreement” and “Final Order,” in the

matter of LG Energy Solution Michigan, Inc., Docket No. TSCA-HQ-2023-5001, were sent to the following persons in the manner indicated:

By Email:
Andrew R. Stewart, Attorney
Sidley Austin LLP
Counsel for LG Energy Solution Michigan, Inc.
1501 K St. N.W.
Washington, DC 20005
Email: [email protected]
Direct Dial: 202-736-8854

James Miles, Attorney
Office of Civil Enforcement
Office of Enforcement and Compliance Assurance
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW
Mail Code: 2249A
Washington, DC 20460
Email: [email protected]
Direct Dial: (202) 564-5161

      Nov 08, 2022

Dated: ____ ______
Emilio Cortes
Clerk of the Board

Does this precedent still control your case?

Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and applies it to your situation with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace