Boston Design & Construction Co., Inc. (Board decision, April 10, 2018)

In re Boston Design & Construction Co., Inc. (EAB TSCA Appeal No. 18-(01)): Board declines sua sponte review

Decision type
Board decision
Dockets
TSCA 18-(01), TSCA-03-2015-0258
Decided
April 10, 2018
Outcome
Procedural
Precedential status
Citable Board precedent
Checked against source
2026-08-21

Apply this precedent to your situation

This is citable Board precedent from 2018, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.

Currency note: this decision dates from 2018
The EPA regulations may have been amended, penalty amounts have been adjusted, and later Board or court decisions may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current compliance advice. Verify the current standard before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or penalty mentioned here.
Final EAB decision
This Environmental Appeals Board order is a final disposition of the proceeding. The Board declined to review the Initial Decision and Default Order on its own initiative because neither party appealed, and stated that the Initial Decision and Default Order would become final on April 16, 2018, under 40 C.F.R. § 22.27(c). The full text below is the official EPA release, transcribed from a scanned PDF with OCR proofreading.
About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official EPA EAB release. The full text is the agency's own release.
Transcribed from a scanned original: EPA EAB released this decision as an image-only file. The full text below is a machine transcription, proofread against the scan. Check the official release before quoting exact language.
Read the official release (epa.gov)

Plain-English summary

The Presiding Officer issued an Initial Decision and Default Order for Boston Design & Construction Co., Inc., on February 28, 2018. Neither party appealed. The Environmental Appeals Board declined to review the case on its own initiative. The Initial Decision and Default Order therefore became a final order on April 16, 2018, under 40 C.F.R. § 22.27(c). This order does not state the underlying violation or any penalty.

Decision snapshot

  • Cited authorities: 40 C.F.R. § 22.27(c)(4), § 22.30(b), and § 22.27(c)
  • Outcome: The Board declined sua sponte review, allowing the Initial Decision and Default Order to become final.
  • Key point: When neither party appeals an Initial Decision and Default Order, the EAB may decline to review it on its own initiative and allow it to become final under the EPA's rules.

Full text (EPA EAB public release)

ENVIRONMENTAL APPEALS BOARD
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
WASHINGTON, D.C.

In re: )
) TSCA Appeal No. 18-(01)
Boston Design & Construction Co., Inc. )
)
TSCA-03-2015-0258 )


ORDER DECLINING TO EXERCISE SUA SPONTE REVIEW

On February 28, 2018, the Presiding Officer issued an Initial Decision and Default Order.

Neither party appealed, and the Board is declining to review the case on its own initiative. See 40 C.F.R. §§ 22.27(c)(4) & 22.30(b). Accordingly, the Initial Decision and Default Order will become a final order on April 16, 2018, pursuant to 40 C.F.R. § 22.27(c).

So ordered.¹

ENVIRONMENTAL APPEALS BOARD

Dated: APR 10 2018

By: ________
Mary Kay Lynch
Environmental Appeals Judge

¹ The three-member panel deciding this matter consists of Environmental Appeals Judges Aaron P. Avila, Mary Kay Lynch, and May Beth Ward.

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that copies of the foregoing Order Declining to Exercise Sua Sponte Review in the matter of Boston Design & Construction Co., Inc., TSCA Appeal No. 18-(01), were sent to the following persons in the manner indicated:

By First Class Certified Mail/
Return Receipt Requested:

Rodham A. Boston, Jr., President
Boston Design & Construction Co., Inc.
611 Mason Ave.
Drexel Hill, PA 19026

By EPA Pouch Mail:

Janet E. Sharke
Senior Assistant Regional Counsel
U.S. EPA Region 3 (MC-3RC50)
1650 Arch Street
Philadelphia, PA 19103

Dated: APR 10 2018


Annette Duncan
Administrative Specialist

Does this precedent still control your case?

Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and applies it to your situation with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace