Vanderbilt Minerals, LLC (Board decision, January 8, 2015)

In re Vanderbilt Minerals, LLC (EAB TSCA Appeal No. 14-04C): $131,188 penalty paid

Decision type
Board decision
Dockets
TSCA 14-04C, TSCA-HQ-2015-5004
Decided
January 8, 2015
Outcome
Settled
Precedential status
Citable Board precedent
Checked against source
2026-08-22

Apply this precedent to your situation

This is citable Board precedent from 2015, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.

Currency note: this decision dates from 2015
The EPA regulations may have been amended, penalty amounts have been adjusted, and later Board or court decisions may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current compliance advice. Verify the current standard before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or penalty mentioned here.
Final EAB decision
This Environmental Appeals Board Final Order is a final disposition of the enforcement proceeding. The Board issued the Final Order after Vanderbilt Minerals paid the full $131,188 civil penalty, waiving its rights to contest the allegations and appeal the order. The full text below is the official EPA release, transcribed from a scanned PDF with OCR proofreading.
About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official EPA EAB release. The full text is the agency's own release.
Transcribed from a scanned original: EPA EAB released this decision as an image-only file. The full text below is a machine transcription, proofread against the scan. Check the official release before quoting exact language.
Read the official release (epa.gov)

Plain-English summary

EPA's Office of Civil Enforcement alleged that Vanderbilt Minerals, LLC violated sections 5(e), 12(b), and 13 of the Toxic Substances Control Act. The complaint sought a $131,188 penalty. Vanderbilt paid the full amount before the EAB issued its Final Order, which resolved the matter civilly and waived the company's rights to contest the allegations and appeal. The order does not adjudicate the alleged violations.

Decision snapshot

  • Cited authorities: 15 U.S.C. §§ 2604(e), 2611(b), 2612; 40 C.F.R. § 22.18(a)(1)-(3)
  • Outcome: Vanderbilt paid the full $131,188 penalty, and the EAB issued a final order resolving the matter.
  • Key point: Under the EPA's quick-resolution procedure, full payment of the proposed penalty can result in a final EAB order without adjudication.

Full text (EPA EAB public release)

F I L E D
JANUARY 8, 2015
Clerk, Environmental Appeals Board
INITIALS [illegible]

BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENTAL APPEALS BOARD
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
WASHINGTON, D.C.

                                   )

In re: )
)
Vanderbilt Minerals, LLC ) TSCA Appeal No. 14-04C
Norwalk, Connecticut )
)
Dkt. No. TSCA-HQ-2015-5004 )

                                       FINAL ORDER

      On December 11, 2014, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's Office of Civil

Enforcement, Waste and Chemical Enforcement Division, filed a complaint against Vanderbilt

Minerals, LLC, alleging that Vanderbilt Minerals violated sections 5(e), 12(b), and 13 of the

Toxic Substances Control Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 2604(e), 2611(b), and 2612. The complaint sought

a penalty of $131,188.

      EPA's Consolidated Rules of Practice, codified at 40 C.F.R. part 22, govern this

administrative enforcement proceeding. Pursuant to 40 C.F.R. § 22.18(a), a respondent may opt

for a quick resolution of an enforcement proceeding at any time by paying the penalty proposed

in the complaint. See 40 C.F.R. § 22.18(a)(1)-(2). The rules further provide that upon payment
in full of the penalty, in cases initiated at EPA Headquarters, the Environmental Appeals Board

("Board") shall issue a final order. 40 C.F.R. § 22.18(a)(3).

      On December 23, 2014, the Board received notification from EPA's Office of

Enforcement and Compliance Assurance that EPA had received full payment of the penalty

($131,188) from Vanderbilt Minerals to resolve the above-captioned matter. Payment by
Vanderbilt Minerals constitutes a waiver of Vanderbilt Minerals' rights to contest the allegations

in the complaint and to appeal this Final Order. See 40 C.F.R. § 22.18(a)(3). In accordance with

40 C.F.R. § 22.18(a)(3), the Board issues this Final Order resolving the above-captioned matter

civilly for the facts and violations alleged in the complaint.

        So ordered. 1                      ENVIRONMENTAL APPEALS BOARD

Date: JANUARY 8, 2015
[signature]
Randolph L. Hill
Environmental Appeals Judge

    1
    The two-member panel deciding this matter consists of Environmental Appeals Judges

Leslye M. Fraser and Randolph L. Hill.

                            CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

  I hereby certify that copies of the foregoing Final Order in In re Vanderbilt Minerals,

LLC, TSCA Appeal No. 14-04C, were sent to the following persons in the manners indicated:

By First Class U.S. Mail, Return Receipt Requested:

Randall Johnson, President
Vanderbilt Minerals, LLC
30 Winfield Street
Norwalk, Connecticut 06855

David H. Quigley, Esq.
Charles L. Franklin, Esq.
Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP
1333 New Hampshire Avenue, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20036-1564

By Facsimile and EPA Pouch Mail:

Geraldine Gardner, Esq.
Office of Civil Enforcement
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. (Mail Code 2249A)
Washington, D.C. 20460
telephone: 202-564-4032
facsimile: 202-564-0019

Date: JANUARY 8, 2015
[signature]
Annette Duncan, Secretary

Does this precedent still control your case?

Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and applies it to your situation with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace