Bedoukian Research, Inc. (Board decision, July 17, 2014)

In re Bedoukian Research, Inc. (EAB TSCA 14-02C): $17,000 penalty paid and final order issued

Decision type
Board decision
Dockets
TSCA 14-02C, TSCA-HQ-2014-5008
Decided
July 17, 2014
Outcome
Settled
Precedential status
Citable Board precedent
Checked against source
2026-08-22

Apply this precedent to your situation

This is citable Board precedent from 2014, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.

Currency note: this decision dates from 2014
The EPA regulations may have been amended, penalty amounts have been adjusted, and later Board or court decisions may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current compliance advice. Verify the current standard before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or penalty mentioned here.
Final EAB decision
This Environmental Appeals Board Final Order is a final disposition of the enforcement matter. Bedoukian Research paid the $17,000 penalty proposed in the complaint, and the Board issued a final order resolving the matter for the facts and violations alleged. The full text below is the official EPA release, transcribed from a scanned PDF with OCR proofreading.
About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official EPA EAB release. The full text is the agency's own release.
Transcribed from a scanned original: EPA EAB released this decision as an image-only file. The full text below is a machine transcription, proofread against the scan. Check the official release before quoting exact language.
Read the official release (epa.gov)

Plain-English summary

EPA alleged that Bedoukian Research, Inc. violated section 12(b) of the Toxic Substances Control Act and 40 C.F.R. § 707.60. The complaint sought a $17,000 civil penalty. Bedoukian paid the full penalty under EPA's quick-resolution rule, which waived its rights to contest the allegations and appeal the Final Order. The EAB issued a Final Order resolving the matter civilly for the facts and violations alleged in the complaint.

Decision snapshot

  • Cited authorities: 15 U.S.C. § 2611(b); 40 C.F.R. §§ 22.18 and 707.60.
  • Outcome: $17,000 penalty paid, rights to contest and appeal waived, and Final Order issued.
  • Key point: Full payment of a complaint's proposed penalty can resolve an EPA Headquarters enforcement matter under 40 C.F.R. § 22.18(a).

Full text (EPA EAB public release)

BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENTAL APPEALS BOARD
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

WASHINGTON, D.C.

)
In re: )
Bedoukian Research, Inc. Docket No. TSCA 14-02C
Danbury, Connecticut )
Respondent. )
)
TSCA-HQ-2014-5008 )

FINAL ORDER

On June 6, 2014, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (“EPA”) Office of Civil Enforcement, Waste and Chemical Enforcement Division, filed a complaint against Bedoukian Research, Inc. (“BRI”) alleging that BRI violated section 12(b) of the Toxic Substances Control Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 2611(b) and the regulations set forth at 40 C.F.R. § 707.60. The Complaint sought a penalty of $17,000.

EPA’s Consolidated Rules of Practice, codified at 40 C.F.R. part 22, govern this administrative enforcement proceeding. Pursuant to 40 C.F.R. 22.18(a), a respondent may opt for a quick resolution of an enforcement proceeding at any time by paying the penalty proposed in the complaint. See 40 C.F.R. §§ 22.18(a)(1)-(2). The rules further provide that upon payment in full of the penalty, in cases initiated at EPA Headquarters, the Environmental Appeals Board (“Board”) shall issue a final order. 40 C.F.R. § 22.18(a)(3).

On July 9, 2014, the Board received notification from EPA’s Office of Enforcement and Compliance Assurance that EPA has received full payment of the penalty ($17,000) from BRI to resolve the above-captioned matter. BRI’s payment constitutes a waiver of BRI’s rights to contest the allegations in the Complaint and to appeal this Final Order. See 40 C.F.R.
§ 22.18(a)(3). In accordance with 40 C.F.R. § 22.18(a)(3), the Board issues this Final Order resolving the above-captioned matter civilly for the facts and violations alleged in the Complaint.

So ordered.

Date: JUL 17 2014
ENVIRONMENTAL APPEALS BOARD

By: [illegible]
Randolph L. Hill
Judge, Environmental Appeals Board

The three-member panel that decided this matter is composed of Environmental Appeals Judges Leslye M. Fraser, Randolph L. Hill, and Kathie A. Stein.

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that copies of the foregoing Final Order in the Matter of Bedoukian Research, Inc, Docket No. TSCA-HQ-2014-5008, were sent to the following persons in the manner indicated:

By Pouch Mail:

Morgan Rog, Esq.
Waste and Chemical Enforcement Division
Office of Civil Enforcement
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
1200 Pennsylvania Ave., N.W. (Mail Code 2249A)
Washington, D.C. 20460
(202) 564-7109

By First Class U.S. Mail:

Joseph Bania
Regulatory Affairs Manager
Bedoukian Research, Inc.
21 Finance Drive
Danbury, CT 06810

[illegible]
Annette Duncan, Secretary
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
Washington, DC 20460-0001

JUL 17 2014

Does this precedent still control your case?

Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and applies it to your situation with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace