E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Company (Board decision, January 13, 2012)
In re E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Company (EAB TSCA 11-08(C), RCRA 11-05(C), and TSCA 11-09(C)): settlement amended for supplemental environmental project
Apply this precedent to your situation
This is citable Board precedent from 2012, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.
Plain-English summary
E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Company and EPA jointly sought a second amendment to a Consent Agreement and Final Order governing DuPont's supplemental environmental project. The Board approved changes that extended the completion date by two years and three months, to March 27, 2014, and added implementation changes. The order states that $2,265,237 of DuPont's $5 million obligation remained as of November 30, 2011. The Board amended its 2005 Final Order and 2009 order to reflect the modifications.
Decision snapshot
- Cited authorities: None stated in the order.
- Outcome: The second joint motion was granted, and the prior orders were amended to reflect the modified Consent Agreement and Final Order.
- Key point: The EAB approved a second extension and related implementation changes for DuPont's supplemental environmental project.
Full text (EPA EAB public release)
BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENTAL APPEALS BOARD
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
WASHINGTON, D.C.
In re: )
) Docket No. TSCA-HQ-2004-0016
E.I. du Pont de Nemours ) Docket No. RCRA-HQ-2004-0016 and Company ) Docket No. TSCA-HQ-2005-5001
)
)
SECOND ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO AMEND SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT
By joint motion filed on December 24, 2008, U.S. EPA’s Office of Civil Enforcement (“EPA”) and E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Company (“DuPont”) (referred to jointly as “the parties”), requested that the Board approve an amendment to a Consent Agreement and Final Order (“CAFO”) originally approved by the Board in December of 2005. See In re E.I. Du Pont de Nemours and Co., Docket Nos. TSCA-HQ-2004-0016, RCRA-HQ-2004-0016, and TSCA-HQ-2005-5001 (EAB, Dec. 21, 2005) (unpub. order) (“Final Order”). In particular, the Joint Motion requested that the Board approve modifications to the CAFO that, among other things, extended the completion date for DuPont’s supplemental environmental project (“SEP”) to December 27, 2011. The Board granted the parties’ motion on January 8, 2009. Order Granting Motion to Amend Settlement Agreement (Jan. 8, 2009).
2
By Joint Motion filed with the Board on December 23, 2011,¹ the parties seek an additional modification to Appendix A of the CAFO. The Second Joint Motion states that the modification would:
extend the Completion Date by two (2) years and three (3) months, to March 27, 2014, and * * * incorporate several other changes to facilitate implementation of the SEP. The parties have inserted deadlines for certain deliverables, added greater flexibility for the duration of future pilot testing, and inserted a requirement that assures that either the levels of residuals in the test substance measured by the contracted characterization laboratory and the contracted biodegradation laboratory are substantially equivalent or that additional activities are performed in lieu of further testing. The Parties believe good cause exists to grant the relief because DuPont has been working in good faith on this project, major milestone activities have been completed under the SEP so that much of the start-up work has been performed, and additional time would provide an opportunity for completion of independent review of methods developed, performance of characterization testing and performance of biodegradation testing. The Parties believe that the remaining DuPont obligation (as of November 30, 2011) of $2,265,237.00 (of the $5 million required under the CAFO) would be best used on completion of the SEP dated December 22, 2011.
Joint Motion at 2
For good cause shown, the Second Joint Motion is granted. The Board’s December 21, 2005 Final Order as well as the Board’s January 8, 2009 order are hereby amended to reflect the above- mentioned CAFO modifications which are incorporated herein by reference.
So ordered.
Dated: January 13, 2012
ENVIRONMENTAL APPEALS BOARD
By: [signature]
Kathie A. Stein
Environmental Appeals Judge
¹ Joint Motion to Amend the Settlement to Allow a Second Extension of the Completion Date for Respondent’s Biodegradation Supplemental Environmental Project (SEP) (Dec. 23, 2011) (hereinafter “Second Joint Motion”).
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that copies of the foregoing Second Order Granting Motion to Amend Settlement Agreement in the matter of E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Company, Docket Nos. TSCA- HQ-2004-0016, RCRA-HQ-2004-0016, and TSCA-HQ-2005-5001, were sent to the following persons in the manner indicated:
Certified Mail: Andrea V. Malinowski
Corporate Counsel
Dupont Legal D-7078
1007 Market Street
Wilmington, DE 19898
Inter-office Mail:
Mark Garvey
Senior Attorney
Waste and Chemicals Enforcement Division
Office of Civil Enforcement (MC-2249A)
Dated: January 13, 2012
[signature]
Annette Duncan
Secretary
Does this precedent still control your case?
Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and applies it to your situation with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace