E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Company (Board decision, January 13, 2012)

In re E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Company (EAB TSCA 11-08(C), RCRA 11-05(C), and TSCA 11-09(C)): settlement amended for supplemental environmental project

Decision type
Board decision
Dockets
TSCA 11-08(C), RCRA 11-05(C), TSCA 11-09(C), TSCA-HQ-2004-0016, RCRA-HQ-2004-0016, TSCA-HQ-2005-5001
Decided
January 13, 2012
Outcome
Modified
Precedential status
Citable Board precedent
Checked against source
2026-08-22

Apply this precedent to your situation

This is citable Board precedent from 2012, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.

Currency note: this decision dates from 2012
The EPA regulations may have been amended, penalty amounts have been adjusted, and later Board or court decisions may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current compliance advice. Verify the current standard before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or penalty mentioned here.
Final EAB decision
This Environmental Appeals Board second order is a final disposition of the motion to amend the settlement agreement. The Board granted the second joint motion and amended its prior orders to reflect modifications to the Consent Agreement and Final Order, including an extension of the supplemental environmental project's completion date to March 27, 2014. The full text below is the official EPA release, transcribed from a scanned PDF with OCR proofreading.
About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official EPA EAB release. The full text is the agency's own release.
Transcribed from a scanned original: EPA EAB released this decision as an image-only file. The full text below is a machine transcription, proofread against the scan. Check the official release before quoting exact language.
Read the official release (epa.gov)

Plain-English summary

E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Company and EPA jointly sought a second amendment to a Consent Agreement and Final Order governing DuPont's supplemental environmental project. The Board approved changes that extended the completion date by two years and three months, to March 27, 2014, and added implementation changes. The order states that $2,265,237 of DuPont's $5 million obligation remained as of November 30, 2011. The Board amended its 2005 Final Order and 2009 order to reflect the modifications.

Decision snapshot

  • Cited authorities: None stated in the order.
  • Outcome: The second joint motion was granted, and the prior orders were amended to reflect the modified Consent Agreement and Final Order.
  • Key point: The EAB approved a second extension and related implementation changes for DuPont's supplemental environmental project.

Full text (EPA EAB public release)

BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENTAL APPEALS BOARD
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
WASHINGTON, D.C.

In re: )
) Docket No. TSCA-HQ-2004-0016
E.I. du Pont de Nemours ) Docket No. RCRA-HQ-2004-0016 and Company ) Docket No. TSCA-HQ-2005-5001
)
)

          SECOND ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO AMEND SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

By joint motion filed on December 24, 2008, U.S. EPA’s Office of Civil Enforcement (“EPA”) and E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Company (“DuPont”) (referred to jointly as “the parties”), requested that the Board approve an amendment to a Consent Agreement and Final Order (“CAFO”) originally approved by the Board in December of 2005. See In re E.I. Du Pont de Nemours and Co., Docket Nos. TSCA-HQ-2004-0016, RCRA-HQ-2004-0016, and TSCA-HQ-2005-5001 (EAB, Dec. 21, 2005) (unpub. order) (“Final Order”). In particular, the Joint Motion requested that the Board approve modifications to the CAFO that, among other things, extended the completion date for DuPont’s supplemental environmental project (“SEP”) to December 27, 2011. The Board granted the parties’ motion on January 8, 2009. Order Granting Motion to Amend Settlement Agreement (Jan. 8, 2009).

2

By Joint Motion filed with the Board on December 23, 2011,¹ the parties seek an additional modification to Appendix A of the CAFO. The Second Joint Motion states that the modification would:

extend the Completion Date by two (2) years and three (3) months, to March 27, 2014, and * * * incorporate several other changes to facilitate implementation of the SEP. The parties have inserted deadlines for certain deliverables, added greater flexibility for the duration of future pilot testing, and inserted a requirement that assures that either the levels of residuals in the test substance measured by the contracted characterization laboratory and the contracted biodegradation laboratory are substantially equivalent or that additional activities are performed in lieu of further testing. The Parties believe good cause exists to grant the relief because DuPont has been working in good faith on this project, major milestone activities have been completed under the SEP so that much of the start-up work has been performed, and additional time would provide an opportunity for completion of independent review of methods developed, performance of characterization testing and performance of biodegradation testing. The Parties believe that the remaining DuPont obligation (as of November 30, 2011) of $2,265,237.00 (of the $5 million required under the CAFO) would be best used on completion of the SEP dated December 22, 2011.

Joint Motion at 2

For good cause shown, the Second Joint Motion is granted. The Board’s December 21, 2005 Final Order as well as the Board’s January 8, 2009 order are hereby amended to reflect the above- mentioned CAFO modifications which are incorporated herein by reference.

So ordered.

Dated: January 13, 2012

ENVIRONMENTAL APPEALS BOARD

By: [signature]
Kathie A. Stein
Environmental Appeals Judge

¹ Joint Motion to Amend the Settlement to Allow a Second Extension of the Completion Date for Respondent’s Biodegradation Supplemental Environmental Project (SEP) (Dec. 23, 2011) (hereinafter “Second Joint Motion”).

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that copies of the foregoing Second Order Granting Motion to Amend Settlement Agreement in the matter of E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Company, Docket Nos. TSCA- HQ-2004-0016, RCRA-HQ-2004-0016, and TSCA-HQ-2005-5001, were sent to the following persons in the manner indicated:

Certified Mail: Andrea V. Malinowski
Corporate Counsel
Dupont Legal D-7078
1007 Market Street
Wilmington, DE 19898

Inter-office Mail:
Mark Garvey
Senior Attorney
Waste and Chemicals Enforcement Division
Office of Civil Enforcement (MC-2249A)

Dated: January 13, 2012

[signature]
Annette Duncan
Secretary

Does this precedent still control your case?

Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and applies it to your situation with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace