Copeq Trading Company, Inc. (Board decision, March 8, 2011)
In re Copeq Trading Company, Inc. (EAB TSCA Docket No. TSCA-HQ-2011-5005): penalty paid and case resolved
Apply this precedent to your situation
This is citable Board precedent from 2011, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.
Plain-English summary
The EPA alleged that Copeq Trading Company, Inc. violated section 8(a) of the Toxic Substances Control Act by failing to comply with the statute's reporting requirements. EPA proposed a civil penalty of $74,536. Copeq paid the full proposed penalty, which provided a quick resolution under the Consolidated Rules of Practice. The Environmental Appeals Board issued a Final Order resolving the case civilly for the violations and facts alleged in the complaint.
Decision snapshot
- Cited authorities: 15 U.S.C. § 2607(a), 40 C.F.R. §§ 22.18(a)(1) and 22.18(a)(3)
- Outcome: Copeq paid the full $74,536 proposed penalty, and the case was resolved civilly.
- Key point: Full payment of the specific penalty proposed in the complaint can provide a quick resolution and lead to a final order.
Full text (EPA EAB public release)
BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENTAL APPEALS BOARD
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
WASHINGTON, D.C.
)
In the Matter of: )
)
Copeq Trading Company, Inc. ) Docket Number TSCA-HQ-2011-5005
)
Respondent. )
)
FINAL ORDER
On December 15, 2010, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's Office of Civil
Enforcement, Waste and Chemical Enforcement Division (EPA), filed a complaint against
Copeq Trading Company, Inc. (Copeq), alleging that Copeq had violated section 8(a) of the
Toxic Substances Control Act, 15 U.S.C. § 2607(a), and proposed a civil penalty of $74,536.
At 40 C.F.R. Part 22, under the Consolidated Rules of Practice that govern this administrative
enforcement proceeding, a respondent may opt for a quick resolution of the proceeding at any
time by paying the specific penalty proposed in the complaint. See § 22.18(a)(1). On March 3,
2011, EPA informed the Environmental Appeals Board EPA had received a copy of the
instrument of payment for the full amount of the $74,536 penalty in resolution of the above-
captioned matter.
In accordance with 40 C.F.R. § 22.18(a)(3), upon receipt of payment in full, the
Environmental Appeals Board shall issue a final order. Therefore, the above-captioned case is
hereby RESOLVED civilly for the violations and facts alleged in the complaint.
SO ORDERED.
By: [signature]
Environmental Appeals Board
Dated: 3/8/2011
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that copies of the foregoing Final Order in the Matter of Copeq Trading
Company, Inc., Docket No. TSCA-HQ-2011-5005, were sent to the following persons in the
manner indicated:
By Facsimile and Pouch Mail:
Kathy M. Clark, Esq.
Waste and Chemical Enforcement Division
Office of Civil Enforcement
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
1200 Pennsylvania Ave., N.W. (Mail Code 2245A)
Washington, D.C. 20460
(202) 564-4164
Fax No. (202) 564-0035
By Facsimile and First Class U.S. Mail:
Victor O'Farill
General Manager
Copeq Trading Company, Inc.
12941 North Fwy, Suite 433
Houston, TX 77060
Roncevert Almond
The Wicks Group, PLLC
1215 17th St., NW
Sumner Square, 4th Floor
Washington, DC 20036
Annette Duncan
Secretary
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
Washington, DC 20460-0001
Dated: MAR - 8 2011
Does this precedent still control your case?
Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and applies it to your situation with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace