Forest City Residential Management, Inc. (Board decision, February 29, 2008)

In re Forest City Residential Management, Inc. (EAB TSCA Appeal No. 08-01C): lead disclosure consent order with a $7,700 penalty and a $50,000 supplemental project

Decision type
Board decision
Dockets
TSCA 08-01C, TSCA HQ-2006-5003
Decided
February 29, 2008
Outcome
Settled
Precedential status
Citable Board precedent
Checked against source
2026-09-10

Apply this precedent to your situation

This is citable Board precedent from 2008, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.

Currency note: this decision dates from 2008
The EPA regulations may have been amended, penalty amounts have been adjusted, and later Board or court decisions may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current compliance advice. Verify the current standard before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or penalty mentioned here.
Final EAB decision
This Environmental Appeals Board order is a final disposition of the enforcement proceeding. The Board entered the Final Order attached to the parties' Consent Agreement, assessed the agreed civil penalty, and made the order effective forthwith. The full text below is the official EPA release, transcribed from a scanned PDF with OCR proofreading.
About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official EPA EAB release. The full text is the agency's own release.
Transcribed from a scanned original: EPA EAB released this decision as an image-only file. The full text below is a machine transcription, proofread against the scan. Check the official release before quoting exact language.
Read the official release (epa.gov)

Plain-English summary

Forest City Residential Management manages residential rental property in nineteen states. One of the buildings it managed was Midtown Towers, a 635-unit complex in Parma, Ohio built before 1978. That makes it target housing under the federal lead-based paint disclosure rule. In January 2001 Forest City already held an incomplete lead inspection report showing lead-based paint in the building. It leased units to four sets of tenants that spring without giving them that report first. EPA said this broke the disclosure rule and therefore section 409 of the Toxic Substances Control Act. The parties settled before any complaint was filed. The gravity-based penalty was $44,000. After a 30 percent reduction for cooperation and credit for a supplemental environmental project, the final civil penalty came to $7,700. Forest City also agreed to pay $50,000 to the Cleveland Housing Network to run at least 50 visual lead inspections in low-income Cleveland housing, then follow-up assessments and abatements, prioritized to homes with young children who have elevated blood lead levels. The Environmental Appeals Board entered the Final Order on February 29, 2008.

Decision snapshot

  • Cited authorities: TSCA sections 16 and 409, 15 U.S.C. §§ 2615 and 2689; the Residential Lead-Based Paint Hazard Reduction Act, 42 U.S.C. § 4852d; the disclosure rule at 40 C.F.R. §§ 745.103 and 745.107(a)(4); and the consolidated rules of practice at 40 C.F.R. Part 22
  • Outcome: Settled by consent agreement and final order. A $7,700 civil penalty was assessed, payable within 30 days, plus a $50,000 supplemental environmental project.
  • Key point: A lessor who holds a lead inspection report must hand it over before the tenant is obligated under the lease. Holding an incomplete report is no excuse.
  • Backstop: If Forest City fails to meet its obligations within two years, EPA may demand the full $44,000 gravity-based penalty.

Full text (EPA EAB public release)

[Filed stamp]
FEB 29 2008
Clerk, Environmental Appeals Board
INITIALS [illegible]

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENTAL APPEALS BOARD
WASHINGTON, D.C.

In the Matter of: )
)
FOREST CITY RESIDENTIAL ) Docket No. TSCA HQ-2006-5003
MANAGEMENT, INC. )
) FINAL ORDER
Respondent. )

Pursuant to section 16 of TSCA, 15 U.S.C. § 2615, it is hereby ORDERED THAT:

  1. The Respondent shall comply with all of the terms of the Consent Agreement, incorporated herein, by reference;

  2. The Respondent is assessed a civil penalty in the total sum of Seven Thousand and Seven Hundred Dollars ($7,700.00); and;

  3. The Respondent shall, within thirty (30) calendar days of the execution of this Final Order, dispatch a cashier's or certified check payable to the order of the "Treasurer of the United States of America" in the amount of Seven Thousand Seven Hundred Dollars ($7,700.00). The check shall indicate that it is for "Docket No. TSCA HQ-2006-5003" and shall be mailed to the following:

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Headquarters Hearing Clerk
P.O. Lockbox 360277
Pittsburgh, PA 15251-6277

or make payment through a wire transfer as described in the Consent Agreement.

  1. This order shall be in effect forthwith.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

ENVIRONMENTAL APPEALS BOARD

Date: [handwritten, illegible] By: [signature]
Environmental Appeals Judge
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency


In the Matter of Forest City Residential Management, Inc.
Docket No. TSCA-HQ-2006-5003

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that the foregoing Consent Agreement and Final Order In the Matter of Forest City Residential Management, Inc., Docket No. TSCA-HQ-2006-5003, has been filed with the EPA Environmental Appeals Board and that copies were sent accordingly:

Certified Mail, Return Receipt Requested

David E. Nash, Partner
McMahon Degulis, LLP
Caxton Building, Suite 350
812 Huron Road
Cleveland, OH 44115-1168

EPA Interoffice Mail Delivery

Sybil Anderson (Mail Code: 1900L)
Headquarters Hearing Clerk
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
1099 14th Street NW, Suite 350 Franklin Court
Washington, DC 20005

EPA Interoffice Mail Delivery

Brian T. Dyer (Mail Code: 2249A)
Office of Enforcement and Compliance Assurance
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue NW
Washington, DC 20460-0001

MAR 3 2008 [signature]
Date Annette Duncan (Mail Code: 1103B)
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Environmental Appeals Board
Ariel Rios Building
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue NW
Washington, DC 20460-0001


UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENTAL APPEALS BOARD
WASHINGTON, D.C.

In the Matter of: )
) Docket No. TSCA HQ-2006-5003
FOREST CITY RESIDENTIAL )
MANAGEMENT, INC. )
Respondent. ) CONSENT AGREEMENT AND
) FINAL ORDER

The Complainant, by delegation from the Administrator of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), is the Director of the Toxics and Pesticides Enforcement Division, EPA Headquarters. The Respondent is Forest City Residential Management, Inc. (Forest City) located at 50 Public Square, Suite 1200, Cleveland, Ohio 44113-2203, jointly referred to as "the Parties," wishing to settle all matters pertaining to this case and having consented to the entry of this Consent Agreement and the attached proposed Final Order (CAFO) prior to the filing of a civil administrative complaint in this matter have agreed to settle this administrative cause of action for the assessment of a civil penalty pursuant to section 16(a) of the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA), 15 U.S.C. § 2615(a), in accordance with EPA's Consolidated Rules of Practice Governing the Administrative Assessment of Civil Penalties, Issuance of Compliance or Corrective Action Orders, and the Revocation, Termination or Suspension of Permits, codified at 40 C.F.R. Part 22. Pursuant to 40 C.F.R. § 22.13(b) and § 22.18(b)(2), it is the intent of the Parties to simultaneously commence and conclude this proceeding by the issuance of this CAFO; NOW, THEREFORE, before the taking of any testimony, without any adjudication of any issues of law or fact herein, and without any admission of violation of law or regulation by the Respondent, the Parties consent to the entry of, and agree to comply with the terms of this CAFO.

I. PRELIMINARY STATEMENT

  1. The Complainant alleges that the Respondent has violated section 409 of TSCA, 15 U.S.C. § 2689, by failing to comply with the regulatory requirements of 40 C.F.R. Part 745, Subpart F-Disclosure of Known Lead-Based Paint and/or Lead-Based Paint Hazards Upon Sale or Lease of Residential Property (Disclosure Rule), which was promulgated pursuant to Section 1018 of the Residential Lead-Based Paint Hazard Reduction Act of 1992, 42 U.S.C. § 4852d (the Act).

  2. The Respondent stipulates that EPA has jurisdiction over the subject matter of this CAFO.

  3. The Respondent hereby waives any defenses it might have as to jurisdiction.

  4. The Respondent neither admits nor denies the factual allegations or conclusions of law contained in this CAFO.

  5. The Respondent hereby waives its right to a judicial or administrative review or hearing on any issue of law or fact set forth in this CAFO.

  6. The Respondent waives its right to seek judicial review of the proposed Final Order.

II. EPA FINDINGS OF FACT AND LAW

  1. Forest City is a real estate company that manages residential real estate properties in nineteen (19) states.

  2. For all periods of time relevant to the violations alleged herein, the Respondent managed a residential property known as Midtown Towers, a 635-unit complex that is located at 5676 Broadview Road, Parma, Ohio 44134 (the Midtown Towers Property).

  3. The Midtown Towers Property was constructed before 1978.

  4. The Midtown Towers Property is "target housing" as defined by 40 C.F.R. § 745.103.

  5. Forest City manages at least twenty-nine (29) target housing properties comprised of over ten thousand (10,000) dwelling units.

  6. In exchange for monetary consideration, Forest City entered into a contract to lease with the following persons, respectively, which allowed these people to reside at the Midtown Towers Property:

Jose Hernandez and Mindy Molzan (contract entered 4/18/01);
Maria Rivas (contract entered on 5/29/01);
Paula, Nicholas, and Sean Wedig (contract entered on 5/17/01); and
Kenneth and Judith Wilson (contract entered on 5/17/01).

  1. These people are, hereinafter, referred to collectively as "Midtown Towers Lessees."

  2. As a result of the contracts to lease, the Respondent became a "lessor," and each Midtown Towers Lessee became a "lessee" as those terms are defined by 40 C.F.R. § 745.103.

  3. Pursuant to 40 C.F.R. § 745.107(a)(4), before a lessee is obligated under any contract to lease target housing, the lessor of the target housing must provide the lessee with any record or report available to the lessor, or a summary of any such record or report, pertaining to lead-based paint (LBP) and/or lead-based paint hazards in the target housing being leased.

  4. In January 2001, the Respondent had in its possession an incomplete lead inspection report for an inspection that was conducted on January 12 - 17, 2001, which was prepared by Richard B. Budman of ALC Environmental for the Midtown Towers Property.

  5. This incomplete lead inspection report revealed the presence of lead-based paint in the Midtown Towers Property.

  6. The Respondent did not provide the Midtown Towers Lessees the lead inspection report before each lessee became obligated under his/her respective contract to lease.

  7. The Respondent's failure to provide the lead inspection report to the lessees before they were obligated under their respective contracts to lease is a violation of 40 C.F.R. § 745.107(a)(4) and, thus a prohibited act under section 409 of TSCA, 15 U.S.C. § 2689.

III. PROPOSED CIVIL PENALTY

  1. Section 1018(b)(5) of the Act makes it a prohibited act under section 409 of TSCA for any person to fail or refuse to comply with the Disclosure Rule requirements. Section 16 of TSCA, section 1018(b)(5) of the Act, and the Civil Monetary Inflation Rule, 40 C.F.R. Part 19, authorize the assessment of a civil penalty of up to $11,000 for each violation of the Disclosure Rule. Pursuant to section 16 of TSCA and the Act, the Complainant proposes to assess a final civil penalty in the amount of seven thousand seven hundred dollars ($7,700.00) against the Respondent, based on the violations set forth above herein, and after consideration of the following statutory penalty factors: (i) the nature of the violation, (ii) the circumstances surrounding the violation, (iii) the extent of the violation, (iv) the gravity of the violation, (v) the Respondent's ability to pay, (vi) the Respondent's history of prior such violations, and (vii) such other matters as justice may require. This civil penalty is proposed in accordance with EPA's Lead-Based Paint Disclosure Rule Enforcement Response Policy (December 1999) and EPA's Final Supplemental Environmental Project Policy (April 1998) (SEP Policy).

  2. The Respondent has agreed to provide $50,000.00 for a Supplemental Environmental Project (SEP), the terms of which are discussed in Section V of this CAFO, entitled "Supplemental Environmental Project: A Community-Based Initiative." In accordance with the SEP Policy dated April 10, 1998, whenever a SEP is conducted by a respondent, the total proposed penalty must be calculated by the Complainant in accordance with the SEP Penalty Calculation Worksheet, which is attached to the SEP Policy. The following represents the total proposed civil penalty based on the SEP Penalty Calculation Worksheet:

  3. Calculation of settlement amount without a SEP

1a. Total penalty: $44,000.00
1b. Economic benefit: $0
1c. Reduction of 30% for attitude, cooperation and good faith: $13,200.00
1d. Settlement amount: $30,800.00

  1. Calculation of the minimum penalty amount with a SEP

2a. 10% of the settlement amount: $3,080.00
2b. Economic benefit plus the settlement amount: $3,080.00
2c. 25% of the settlement amount: $7,700.00
2d. Minimum penalty amount (greater of 2c. or 2b) $7,700.00

  1. Calculation of the SEP cost using the project model $29,684.00 @$50,000.00

  2. Calculation of mitigation percentage and mitigation amount

4a. SEP Cost mitigation percentage: 80%
4b. SEP Mitigation Amount (multiply step 3 by step 4a.) $23,747.20

  1. Calculation of the final settlement penalty

5a. Subtract 4b. from step 1d. $7,053.00
5b. Final Settlement Penalty (greater of step 2d. or step 5a) $7,700.00

IV. TERMS OF SETTLEMENT

  1. The Respondent consents to the execution of the CAFO and consents to the payment of a civil penalty in the amount of seven thousand seven hundred dollars ($7,700.00).

a. Not more than thirty (30) calendar days after the execution date of the Final Order by EPA's Environmental Appeals Board (EAB), Respondent shall either submit a cashier's or certified check with a notation of "Forest City Residential Management, Inc., Civil Penalty Docket No. TSCA-HQ-2006-5003," payable to the order of the "Treasurer, United States of America," in the amount of $7,700.00 to:

EPA-Washington
(Hearing Clerk)
Docket No. TSCA-HQ-2006-5003
P.O. Box 360277
Pittsburgh, PA 15251-6277

or pay $7,700 by wire transfer with a notation of "Forest City Residential Management, Inc., Civil Penalty Docket No. TSCA-HQ-2006-5003" by using the following instructions:

Name of Beneficiary: EPA
Number of Account for Deposit: 68010099
The Bank Holding Acct: Treas NYC
The ABA Routing Number: 021030004

b. Respondent shall forward a copy of the check or documentation of a wire transfer to:

Brian T. Dyer, Case Development Officer
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (2245A)
Toxics and Pesticides Enforcement Division
1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW
Washington, D.C. 20460

c. The Respondent understands that its failure to timely pay any portion of the civil penalty stated in Paragraph 22 may result in the commencement of a civil action in Federal District Court to recover the full remaining balance, along with penalties and accumulated interest. In such case, interest shall accrue thereon at the rate determined by the U.S. Secretary of Treasury on the unpaid balance until such civil penalty and any accrued interest are paid in full. Additionally, as provided by 31 U.S.C. § 3717(e)(2), a six percent (6%) per annum penalty (late charge) may be assessed on any amount not paid within ninety (90) days of the due date.

  1. This CAFO resolves the civil and administrative claims of the United States alleged in this CAFO for violations of the Act, and the regulations promulgated thereunder; and in consideration of the payment of the civil penalty and full performance of the acts required under this CAFO, the EPA covenants not to take administrative action against Forest City for any alleged violations of the Act occuring prior to the execution of the Final Order. Forest City signs this CAFO with respect to all the Regulated Properties listed in Appendix A. The effect of settlement described in this paragraph takes effect upon the completion of the Respondent's obligations under this Consent Agreement; and is conditional upon the accuracy and thoroughness of the Respondent's representations and certifications as memorialized in this Consent Agreement and the Respondent's letter dated July 18, 2003.

  2. Unless otherwise expressly provided herein, terms used in the text of this CAFO have the same meaning as the Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 4851b, d, the Disclosure Rule, and section 402 of TSCA, 15 U.S.C. § 2681.

V. SUPPLEMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL PROJECT: A COMMUNITY-BASED INITIATIVE

  1. Within thirty (30) days after the EAB has executed the Final Order, the Respondent shall enter into a contract with the Cleveland Housing Network (CHN) for the amount of $50,000.00, net to CHN. CHN is a nonprofit organization that works to improve affordable housing for low-income residents in the Cleveland, Ohio metropolitan area.

  2. The Respondent shall provide the Complainant with a copy of the contract between the Respondent and CHN (CHN Contract) within forty-five (45) days following the EAB's execution of the Final Order.

  3. The CHN Contract shall provide that CHN will use the money exclusively to conduct the following project:

a. First, CHN shall identify, target housing units (constructed prior to 1978) in its Lease Purchase Program that are located in the Cleveland metropolitan area, occupied by low-income tenants including one or more children under the age of six years old (children) and/or a pregnant woman, and that are not affiliated with or receiving project-based assistance from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. No property involved in this project may be owned, or occupied by an employee or agent of CHN or the Respondent.

b. After identifying such target housing that has never been tested for lead-based paint, CHN shall conduct a minimum of 50 visual lead-based paint inspections in such housing, to determine if further inspections are needed.

c. If any visual inspections identify potential lead-based paint hazards CHN shall conduct as many follow up lead-based paint inspections or risk assessments as can be completed within the available contract amount.

d. All lead-based paint inspection or risk assessment reports must be delivered to the appropriate unit/building owner, property manager, if any, lessee, and to the Respondent.

e. If funds are still available, CHN shall conduct lead-based paint abatements or lead-based paint hazard reductions, whichever is determined to be of greater use in such housing that has been identified as having lead-based paint. The priority for such lead-based paint abatements or lead-based paint hazard reductions shall be to first address housing where a child or children under the age of six with known elevated blood lead levels resides, then housing where a child or children under the age of six resides without regard to the child/or children having known elevated blood lead levels, then where a pregnant woman resides.

f. CHN will provide an abatement report if an abatement occurs, or a lead-based paint hazard reduction report if a lead-based paint hazard reduction occurs, to the unit/building owner, property manager, if any, lessee, and to the Respondent.

  1. The Respondent's contract with CHN shall require that all lead-based paint activities are conducted in accordance with all applicable local, state, tribal, and federal laws, including Chapter 3701-32 of the Ohio Administrative Code.

  2. The Respondent's Contract with CHN shall require that CHN obtain all applicable local, state, tribal and federal permits, licenses, or other forms of approval or authorization necessary to conduct the lead-based paint activities under the Contract. The Contract shall require that clearance examinations following any lead-based paint abatement or lead-based paint hazard reduction shall be performed by persons or entities independent of those performing the lead-based paint abatement or lead-based paint hazard reduction activities. The same in-house employee shall not conduct both the lead-based paint abatement or hazard reduction activity and the clearance examination.

  3. No later than two months after the EAB has executed the Final Order, the CHN Contract shall commence.

  4. The Respondent's Contract with CHN shall require that all projects under the Contract be successfully completed no later than one (1) year after the Respondent has entered into the contract with CHN.

  5. Respondent shall submit a SEP Completion Report to EPA within ninety (90) days of completion of CHN's work on the SEP. The SEP Report shall contain the following information:

(1) A detailed description of these SEPs as implemented;
(2) itemized costs;
(3) certification that these SEPs have been fully implemented pursuant to the SEP provisions of this Consent Agreement;
(4) a description of the environmental benefits resulting from implementation of these SEPs; and,
(5) the signature of, and certification by, the Respondent's Co-President and Chief Operations Officer.

a. Respondent agrees that failure to submit the SEP Completion Report shall be deemed a violation of this Consent Agreement and Respondent shall become liable for the full penalty pursuant to Paragraph 45 below.

b. Respondent agrees that EPA may inspect the locations where these SEPs are implemented at any time in order to confirm that these SEPs are being undertaken in conformity with the representations made herein.

c. After Complainant receives the SEP Completion Report, Complainant will notify the Respondent, in writing to:

(1) identify any deficiencies in the SEP Completion Report itself along with a statement as to whether it will grant an additional thirty (30) days for Respondent to correct any deficiencies; or
(2) confirm that EPA concludes that the projects have been completed satisfactorily; or
(3) determine that the projects have not been completed satisfactorily and seek stipulated penalties in accordance with Paragraph 34 of this Consent Agreement.

d. If Complainant determines that the SEP Completion Report is deficient, but EPA has not yet made a final determination about the adequacy of the SEP completion itself, Complainant shall permit Respondent the opportunity to object in writing to the notification of deficiency given pursuant to this paragraph within ten (10) days of receipt of such notification. Complainant and Respondent shall have an additional thirty (30) days from the receipt by Complainant of the notification of objection to reach agreement on changes necessary to the SEP Completion Report. If agreement cannot be reached on any such issue within this thirty (30) day period, Complainant shall provide a written statement to Respondent of its decision on the adequacy of the SEP completion. This decision shall be final and binding upon Respondent.

  1. The Respondent shall also forward the final report to the appropriate local and state health departments.

  2. In the event that Respondent fails to comply with any of the terms or provisions of this Consent Agreement relating to the performance of this SEP herein and/or to the extent that the actual expenditures for this SEP does not equal or exceed the cost of the SEP as set forth in Paragraph 25, Respondent shall be liable for stipulated penalties according to the provisions set forth below:

(1) Failure to implement or complete this SEP as required by this Consent Agreement will cause Respondent to be liable to EPA for payment of the full penalty pursuant to Paragraph 45 below.

(2) If this SEP is satisfactorily completed in accordance with this Consent Agreement, but the Respondent expends less than one hundred percent (100%) of the total amount for this SEP as set forth in Paragraph 25, the Respondent shall pay a stipulated penalty equal to the difference between the amount of eligible SEP cost incurred by Respondent and the minimum amount Respondent agreed to spend on the SEP as set forth in Paragraph 25.

(3) If the SEP is completed in accordance with this Consent Agreement, and the Respondent spends one hundred percent (100%) of the amount Respondent agreed to spend on the SEP as set forth in Paragraph 25, Respondent shall not be liable for any stipulated penalty.

(4) If the SEP Completion Report is not submitted within thirty (30) days from the date due as set forth above in Paragraph 32, Respondent shall pay a stipulated penalty in the amount of $500 and an additional $500 for each thirty (30) day period the SEP Completion Report is past due beyond the date set forth above in Paragraph 32.

(5) Respondent may, in writing, request permission to extend the due date of the SEP Completion Report. If the Complainant deems the request reasonable then Complainant will, in writing, extend the SEP Completion Report due date.

  1. Respondent hereby certifies that, as of the date of this Consent Agreement, Respondent is not required to perform or develop these SEPs by any federal, state, tribal or local law or regulation; nor is Respondent required to perform or develop these SEPs by any other agreement, grant or as injunctive relief in this or any other case.

  2. Respondent further certifies that it has not received, and is not presently negotiating to receive, credit in any other enforcement action for these SEPs.

  3. Respondent certifies that it is not presently negotiating to receive, applying or plan to apply for any federal, state, tribal grant to pay for these SEPs.

VI. OTHER MATTERS

  1. The Complainant shall not be liable for any injuries or damages to persons or property resulting from any act or omission of the Respondent, CHN, or any person carrying out any project or activity, including lead-based paint activities, under this CAFO. The Complainant shall not be held liable for any failure to act pursuant to any provision of this CAFO. The Complainant shall not be identified as a party to the CHN Contract or any other contract entered into by the Respondent in carrying out the lead-based paint activities. In the event that liability might be placed upon the Complainant, the Respondent agrees to indemnify and hold harmless the Complainant from any and all causes of action due to any act or omission of the Respondent or any agent of the Respondent in carrying out the lead-based paint activities under this CAFO.

  2. This CAFO does not relieve the Respondent of the duty to comply with all applicable provisions of TSCA, the Act, or with any other federal, state, tribal, and local laws and regulations.

  3. Neither the assessed penalty nor the money expended by the Respondent under this CAFO, including the SEP project, may be claimed as tax deductible by the Respondent.

  4. This CAFO shall be binding upon the Parties to this action, their officers, directors, employees, successors and assigns. The undersigned representative of each Party to this CAFO certifies that he or she is duly authorized by the Party whom he or she represents to enter into the terms and bind that Party to it.

  5. The Parties agree to bear their own costs in this matter.

  6. The Respondent shall forward copies of all documents and notices required under this CAFO to the following person:

Brian Dyer, Case Development Officer (2245A)
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20460

  1. The Complainant shall forward all notices or other communications under this CAFO to the following person:

David E. Nash, Partner
McMahon DeGulis, LLP
Caxton Building Suite 650
812 Huron Rd
Cleveland, Ohio 44115-1168

  1. If the Respondent fails to meet its obligations under this CAFO within two years of the execution of the Final Order, the Complainant may send a demand letter for the full gravity-based penalty of forty-four thousand dollars ($44,000.00). Payment of this full penalty shall be due within ten (10) days of the receipt of the demand letter

  2. When executed by the EAB, the Final Order shall have the same force and effect as defined in 40 C.F.R. § 22.03. The Respondent shall remain responsible for the completion of all work required under this CAFO and the satisfaction of all of its terms.

  3. This Consent Agreement constitutes the final, complete and exclusive agreement and understanding between the Parties with respect to the settlement embodied herein. The Parties acknowledge that there are no representations, agreements or other understandings relating to the settlement other than those expressly contained in this Consent Agreement.

  4. All of the terms and conditions of this CAFO together comprise one agreement, and each of the terms and conditions is in consideration for all of the other terms and conditions. In the event that this Consent Agreement (or one or more of its terms and conditions) is held invalid, or is not executed by all of the signatory Parties in identical form, or is not approved in such identical form by the EPA's EAB or its designated representative, then the entire Consent Agreement shall be null and void.

FOR THE COMPLAINANT:

[signature]
Stephanie Brown, Acting Director
Toxics and Pesticides Enforcement Division
Office of Civil Enforcement
Date: [handwritten, illegible]

FOR THE RESPONDENT:

[signature]
George Cvijovic
Co-President and Chief Operations Officer
Forest City Residential Management, Inc.
Date: [handwritten, illegible]

[A second, separately executed signature page follows, bearing the same two signature blocks. On that page the Complainant's date line is blank and the Respondent's date is handwritten and illegible.]

Appendix A: Regulated Properties Managed by Forest City Residential Management, Inc. from May 1, 1999 to September 1, 2003

Name Address City, State, Zip Status [1]
Drake Towers 1512 Spruce St. Philadelphia, PA 19102 LBP is presumed on renovated surfaces.
Grand Lowry Lofts 200 Rampart Way, Suite 100 Denver, CO 80230 LBP is presumed and known on windows, stair railings, attic ladders, door casings and column paint.
Kennedy Biscuit Lofts 129 Franklin St. Cambridge, MA 02139 LBP reduction completed in 2005 for the daycare center.
Lofts at 1835 Arch 1835 Arch Street Philadelphia, PA 19103 LBP is presumed on renovated surfaces.
The River Lofts (American Cigar) 2300 E. Carey Street Richmond, VA 23223 LBP is presumed on renovated surfaces.
Brookview Place (Senior Housing) [2] 4032 N. Main St. Dayton, OH 45405 LBP on elevator doors.
Pine Grove Manor (Elderly Households) [3] 1764 Apple Ave. Muskegon Twnshp, MI 49442 LBP on elevator doors.
Cedar Place (Senior Housing) 201 West Jolly Rd. Lansing, MI 48910 LBP on elevator doors and parking stops.
John Sale Manor (Elderly Households) 119 W. Second St. Xenia, OH 45385 LBP on elevator doors and curbs.
Ashtabula Towers 325 West 48th St. Ashtabula, OH 44004 Abatement completed April 2004.
Midtown Towers 5676 Broadview Rd. Parma, OH 44134 LBP on sprinkler pipes, stairwells, mini blinds and bathroom ceramic tiles.
Parmatown 6871 Ames Rd. Parma, OH 44129 LBP on sprinkler pipes and bathroom ceramic tiles.
Knolls 3138 Maple Ave. #C Orange, CA 92869 Property Exempt; Certified LBP Inspection shows no LBP.
Trellis [4] 308 Charles Street Newport News, VA 23608 Property Exempt; Certified LBP Inspection shows no LBP.

[1] Based on documentation available February 24, 2006.
[2] Senior Housing is housing where at least one household member must be age 55 or older. Minors are excluded under the Federal Housing for Older Persons Act. There is little risk of exposure to pregnant women in this type of housing.
[3] An Elderly Household is HUD-assisted housing in which the head of the household or spouse must be age 62 or older. Minors may reside there with the older members of the household. There is little risk of exposure to children under the age of 6 or pregnant women.
[4] Property no longer managed by Forest City Residential Management

Name Address City, State, Zip Status [1]
Alpha Towers (Elderly Households) 525 East Woodruff Ave. Toledo, OH 43624 Property Exempt; Certified LBP Inspection shows no LBP.
Brookpark Place (Elderly Households) 290 National Rd. Wheeling, WV 26003 Property Exempt; Certified LBP Inspection shows no LBP.
Buckeye Towers 3900 Rhodes Ave. New Boston, OH 45662 Property Exempt; Certified LBP Inspection shows no LBP.
Frenchtown Place (Elderly Households) 1201 N. Macomb St. Monroe, MI 48162 Property Exempt; Certified LBP Inspection shows no LBP.
Independence Place I (Senior Housing) 9231 Independence Blvd. Parma Heights, OH 44130 Property Exempt; Certified LBP Inspection shows no LBP.
Independence Place II (Senior Housing) 9233 Independence Blvd. Parma Heights, OH 44130 Property Exempt; Certified LBP Inspection shows no LBP.
Lima Towers 790 S. Main St. Lima, OH 45804 Property Exempt; Certified LBP Inspection shows no LBP.
Park Place Towers (Elderly Households) 34 Park St. Mt. Clemens, MI 48043 Property Exempt; Certified LBP Inspection shows no LBP.
Parkland Place (Elderly Households) 12250 Thirty First St. Parkersburg, WV 26101 Property Exempt; Certified LBP Inspection shows no LBP.
Perrytown Place (Senior Housing) Mgmt Office, Highland Pines Dr. Pittsburgh, PA 15237 Property Exempt; Certified LBP Inspection shows no LBP.
Riverside Towers 85 West Pine St. Coshocton, OH 43812 Property Exempt; Certified LBP Inspection shows no LBP.
Towne Centre (Elderly Households) 401 West Michigan Ave. Ypsilanti, MI 48197 Property Exempt; Certified LBP Inspection shows no LBP.
Village Square 5403 Main Street Williamsville, NY 14221 Property Exempt; Certified LBP Inspection shows no LBP.
Colony Woods 15309 N.E. 13th St. Bellevue, VA 98007 Property Exempt; Certified LBP Inspection shows no LBP.
Mt. Vernon [footnote marker illegible] 7429 Vernon Square Drive Alexandria, VA 22306 Property Exempt; Certified LBP Inspection shows no LBP.

[1] Based on documentation available February 24, 2006.
[footnote marker illegible] Property no longer managed by Forest City Residential Management
[footnote marker illegible] Property no longer managed by Forest City Residential Management

Name Address City, State, Zip Status [1]
The Pavilion 5441 N.E. River Rd. Chicago, IL 60656 Property Exempt; Certified LBP Inspection shows no LBP.
Regency Club 330 S. New Prospect Rd. Jackson, NJ 08527 Property Exempt; Certified LBP Inspection shows no LBP.
Surfside Towers (Senior Housing) 36250 Lakeshore Blvd. Eastlake, OH 44095 Property Exempt; Certified LBP Inspection shows no LBP.
Woodlake [footnote marker illegible] 14175 Castle Blvd. Silver Springs, MD 20904 Property Exempt; Certified LBP Inspection shows no LBP.

[1] Based on documentation available February 24, 2006.
[footnote marker illegible] Property no longer managed by Forest City Residential Management
[footnote marker illegible] Property no longer managed by Forest City Residential Management

[Transcription notes: the page 1 Final Order prints "section 16 of TSCA, 13 U.S.C. § 2615." TSCA section 16 is codified at 15 U.S.C. § 2615, and the same document cites "15 U.S.C. § 2615(a)" correctly in the Consent Agreement, so the digit is an obvious scan misread and is transcribed as 15. Handwritten signatures and dates are marked, and Appendix A is reflowed from the scanned tables without changing any entry.]

Does this precedent still control your case?

Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and applies it to your situation with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace