FMSHRC ALJ decision Docket SE 99-39 Decided May 19, 1999 Settled Judge Paul Merlin

Drummond Company, Incorporated

Drummond Company, Incorporated (FMSHRC SE 99-39): Settlement approved and penalties modified

Apply this to your situation

This order from 1999 bound only the parties to this case; it isn't precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent say, with citations.

Currency note: this decision dates from 1999
The MSHA standards may have been amended, penalty amounts have been adjusted, and later Commission or court decisions may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current compliance advice. Verify the current standard before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or penalty mentioned here.
Final order, not Commission precedent
This decision by a FMSHRC Administrative Law Judge became the final decision of the Commission 40 days after issuance because the Commission did not direct review (30 U.S.C. § 823(d)(1)). It binds the parties but is not binding on the Commission in other cases. The full text below is from the official FMSHRC release.
About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official FMSHRC release. The full text is the agency's own release.
Read the official release (fmshrc.gov)

Plain-English summary

Drummond Company and the Secretary jointly asked the Judge to approve settlements involving coal and coal-dust accumulations and underground diesel-fuel storage at the Shoal Creek Mine. The proposed total penalty was reduced from $6,000 to $2,950, with the parties also seeking to change two 104(d)(1) matters to 104(a) citations, remove unwarrantable-failure findings, and reduce negligence findings. The parties explained that one accumulation resulted from water on a slope belt and that the operator had invested in repairs and additional cleanup. The Judge found the settlements appropriate under the statutory penalty criteria, approved them, modified the matters identified in the operative order, and ordered payment of $2,950 within 30 days.

Decision snapshot

  • Cited standards: 30 C.F.R. §§ 75.400 and 75.1903(a)(2)
  • Outcome: The settlement was approved, specified enforcement findings were modified, and a $2,950 penalty was ordered.
  • Key point: A settlement may modify violation classifications, negligence findings, and penalties when supported by the statutory penalty criteria.

Full text (FMSHRC public release)

FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION

             1730 K STREET, N.W., 6TH FLOOR

              WASHINGTON, D. C.  20006-3868


                      May 19, 1999

SECRETARY OF LABOR : CIVIL PENALTY PROCEEDING
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH :
ADMINISTRATION (MSHA), : Docket No. SE 99-39
Petitioner : A. C. No. 01-02901-03658
:
v. :
:
DRUMMOND COMPANY, : Shoal Creek Mine
INCORPORATED, :
Respondent :

              DECISION APPROVING SETTLEMENT
                     ORDER TO MODIFY
                       ORDER TO PAY

Before: Judge Merlin

 This case is before me upon a petition for assessment of the

civil penalties filed under section 105(d) of the Federal Mine
Safety and Health Act of 1977. The parties have filed a joint
motion to approve settlements. A reduction in the penalties from
$6,000 to $2,950 is proposed.

 Order No. 4477477 was issued under section  104(d)(1) of the

Mine Act for a violation of 30 C.F.R. § 75.400 because loose coal
and coal dust accumulated at various locations in the bleeder
roadway. The originally assessed penalty was $1,000 and the
proposed settlement is $100. The parties advise that MSHA
modified the violation from a 104(d)(1) order to a 104(a)
citation, deleted the unwarrantable failure finding and reduced
negligence from high to low prior to the assessment of a penalty.
However, these modifications were not considered when the penalty
was calculated by MSHA. Therefore, the reduction reflects the
penalty that would have been assessed had MSHA considered the
changes to the violation.

 Order No. 4477476 was issued under section  104(d)(1) of the

Mine Act for a violation of 30 C.F.R. § 75.1903(a)(2) because
the underground diesel fuel storage facilities were not provided
with self-closing doors. The violation was designation
non-significant and substantial and resulted from the operator's
unwarrantable failure. The originally assessed penalty was $1,000
and the proposed settlement is $100. In their joint motion the
parties request that the violation be modified from a 104(d)(1)
order to a 104(a) citation, that the unwarrantable failure
finding be deleted and that negligence be reduce from high
to moderate. The parties advise that there is no evidence that
the operator was aware or should have been aware of this
condition nor is there evidence indicating how long this
condition existed. Finally, the parties state that the area was
inspected daily by the operator and there is no record that
the doors were inoperative or in need of repair.

 Citation No. 4480767 was issued under  section  104(d)(1) of

the Mine Act for a violation of 30 C.F.R. § 75.400 because coal
and coal dust accumulated along both sides of the slope belt for
approximately 4,500 feet. The citation further notes that the
fire boss book contained notes that the slope belt needed
cleaning on each shift for the two weeks prior to the issuance of
the citation. The violation was designated significant and
substantial and that it resulted from the operator's
unwarrantable failure. The originally assessed penalty was
$4,000 and the proposed settlement is $2,750. The parties
request in their motion that the violation be modified from a
104(d)(1) citation to a 104(a) citation, that the unwarrantable
failure finding be deleted and that negligence be reduced from
high to moderate. The parties advise that the accumulations were
caused when the longwall sections encountered water problems
resulting in water being transported along with the coal on the
conveyor system. While traveling up the incline of the slope
belt, coal and water would frequently wash off the conveyor onto
the mine floor.

 The parties advise in their joint motion that at the time of

the violation the operator was in the process of addressing the
problems with the slope belt. According to the motion, the
operator had committed to spending $217,000 for the repair of the
surge bin which is used to maintain an even distribution of coal
throughout the length of the slope belt. The operator also
purchased and installed a mini-conveyor system at the bottom of
the slope to return coal fines and spillage back onto the slope
belt. (It subsequently ordered a second mini-conveyor).
Finally, the operator had attended to the accumulations along the
slope belt by assigning additional personnel to keep the area
clean. The motion states that these facts were unknown to MSHA
when the citation was issued.

   I have  considered  the  representations and documentation

submitted in this case, and I conclude that the proffered
settlements are appropriate under the criteria set forth in
section 110(i) of the Act.

 In light  of  the  foregoing,  the  motion  for  approval of

settlements is GRANTED.

 It  is  ORDERED  that  Order No. 4477476 be MODIFIED from  a

104(d)(1) order, to delete the unwarrantable failure finding and
to reduce negligence from high to moderate.

 It is further ORDERED that Citation  No. 4480767 be MODIFIED

from a 104(d)(1) citation, to delete the unwarrantable failure
finding and to reduce negligence from high to moderate.

 It is  further  ORDERED  that  the operator pay a penalty of

$2,950 within 30 days of this decision.

                          Paul Merlin
                          Chief Administrative Law Judge

Distribution:

William Lawson, Esq., Office of the Solicitor, U. S. Department
of Labor, Suite 150, Chambers Building, Highpoint Office Center,
100 Centerview Drive, Birmingham, AL 35216

David M. Smith, Esq., Maynard, Cooper & Gale, P.C., 1901 Sixth
Avenue North, 2400 Am South/Harbert Plaza, Birmingham, AL
35203-2618

Mr. Sammy O. Key, UMWA, 986 Underwood Ferry Road, Cordova, AL
35550

/gl

FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION
1730 K STREET NW, 6TH FLOOR
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20006-3868

William Lawson, Esq.
Office of the Solicitor
U. S. Department of Labor
Suite 150, Chambers Building
Highpoint Office Center
100 Centerview Drive
Birmingham, AL 35216

FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION
1730 K STREET NW, 6TH FLOOR
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20006-3868

David M. Smith, Esq.
Maynard, Cooper & Gale, P.C.
1901 Sixth Avenue North
2400 Am South/Harbert Plaza
Birmingham, AL 35203-2618

FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION
1730 K STREET NW, 6TH FLOOR
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20006-3868

Mr. Sammy O. Key, UMWA
986 Underwood Ferry Road
Cordova, AL 35550

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read what one judge decided for one employer in 1999, and it binds only those parties. Ezel checks the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.