Jim Walter Resources, Inc.
Jim Walter Resources, Inc. (FMSHRC SE 95-143): Settlement approved and penalty reduced
Apply this to your situation
This order from 1995 bound only the parties to this case; it isn't precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
Jim Walter Resources, Inc. moved to settle a civil penalty proceeding. The settlement proposed vacating Citation No. 3182463 and reducing the penalties for the remaining violations from $19,500 to $10,500. Judge Gary Melick approved the settlement under the Mine Act's penalty criteria and ordered the company to pay $10,500 within 30 days.
Decision snapshot
- Cited standard(s): 30 U.S.C. § 815(d); 30 U.S.C. § 820(i)
- Outcome: One citation was vacated, the remaining penalties were reduced to $10,500, and the settlement was approved.
- Key point: The judge approved a negotiated penalty reduction after considering the parties' representations and supporting documentation.
Full text (FMSHRC public release)
FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION
OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGES
2 SKYLINE, SUITE 1000
5203 LEESBURG PIKE
FALLS CHURCH, VIRGINIA 22041
August 25, 1995
SECRETARY OF LABOR, : CIVIL PENALTY PROCEEDING
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH :
ADMINISTRATION (MSHA), :
Petitioner : Docket No. SE 95-143
: A.C. No. 01-01322-03990
v. :
: No. 5 Mine
JIM WALTER RESOURCES, INC., :
Respondent :
DECISION
Appearances: William Lawson, Esq., Office of the Solicitor,
U.S. Department of Labor, Birmingham, Alabama,
for the Petitioner;
R. Stanley Morrow, Esq., Birmingham, Alabama,
for the Respondent.
Before: Judge Melick
This case is before me upon a petition for assessment of civil
penalty under Section 105(d) of the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act
of 1977 (the Act). At hearing Petitioner filed a motion to approve a
settlement agreement and to dismiss the case. Vacation of Citation
No. 3182463 and a reduction in penalty for the remaining violations
from $19,500 to $10,500 were proposed. I have considered the
representations and documentation submitted in this case, including
the representations on the record at hearing, and I conclude that the
proffered settlement is acceptable under the criteria set forth in
Section 110(i) of the Act.
WHEREFORE, the motion for approval of settlement is GRANTED, and
it is ORDERED that Respondent pay a penalty of $10,500 within 30 days
of this order.
Gary Melick
Administrative Law Judge
Distribution:
William Lawson, Esq., Office of the Solicitor, U.S. Dept. of Labor,
Highpoint Office Center, Suite 150, 100 Centerview Drive,
Birmingham, AL 35216
R. Stanley Morrow, Esq., Jim Walter Resources, Inc., P.O. Box 133,
Birmingham, AL 35444
/jf
Get today's answer for your situation
You just read what one judge decided for one employer in 1995, and it binds only those parties. Ezel checks the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent and answers your specific situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.