S & H Mining Co. (ALJ decision, March 30, 1995)
S & H Mining Co. (FMSHRC SE 94-570): Settlement approved with $1,000 penalty
Apply this to your situation
This order from 1995 bound only the parties to this case; it isn't precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
S & H Mining Co. employee Gary Byrge faced a civil penalty proceeding under the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act. The Secretary proposed a $1,000 penalty, and Byrge agreed to pay it in full under a settlement. Judge Gary Melick found the settlement acceptable under the statutory criteria and approved it. The penalty was ordered payable in six monthly installments.
Decision snapshot
- Governing provisions: 30 U.S.C. § 820(i); 30 U.S.C. § 820(c)
- Outcome: The settlement was approved, and the $1,000 penalty was ordered payable in six installments.
- Key point: The ALJ approved the parties' settlement after finding it acceptable under the Mine Act's settlement criteria.
Full text (FMSHRC public release)
[DOCID: f:se94-570.wais]
S & H MINING CO
March 30, 1995
SE 94-570
FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION
OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGES
2 SKYLINE, SUITE 1000
5203 LEESBURG PIKE
FALLS CHURCH, VIRGINIA 22041
March 30, 1995
SECRETARY OF LABOR,
: CIVIL PENALTY PROCEEDING
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH :
ADMINISTRATION (MSHA), : Docket No. SE 94-570 Petitioner : A.C. No. 40-03011-03562 M :
v. :
:
GARY BYRGE, Employed by S & H :
MINING CO.
:
Respondent : Mine No. 7
DECISION APPROVING SETTLEMENT
Appearances: Mark R. Malecki, Esq., Office of the Solicitor, U.S. Department of Labor, Arlington, Virginia for the Petitioner; Gary Byrge, Oliver Springs, Tennessee, pro se.
This case is before me upon a petition for assessment of civil penalty under Section 110(c) of the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977 (the Act). At hearing Petitioner filed a motion to approve a settlement agreement in which Respondent agreed to pay the proposed penalty of $1,000 in full. I have considered the representations and documentation submitted in this case, and I conclude that the proffered settlement is acceptable under the relevant criteria set forth in Section 110(i) of the Act.
WHEREFORE, the motion for approval of settlement is GRANTED, and it is ORDERED that Respondent pay a penalty of $1,000 in 6 months installments as set forth in the agreement.
Gary Melick
Administrative Law
Judge
Distribution:
Mark R. Malecki, Esq., U.S. Department of Labor, Office of the Solicitor, 4015 Wilson Blvd., Arlington, VA 22203
Marcus P. McGraw, Esq., Bryan R. Reynolds, Esq., Greenebaum, Doll & McDonald, 1400 Vine Center Tower, Lexington, KY 40507
/jf
What applies to your situation today?
This order bound one employer. Ezel checks the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent against your facts, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace