Jim Walter Resources, Inc.
Jim Walter Resources, Inc. (FMSHRC SE 92-219 and related dockets): Settlement approved with citations vacated and penalties reduced
Apply this to your situation
This order from 1992 bound only the parties to this case; it isn't precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
Jim Walter Resources, Inc. faced civil penalty proceedings involving its No. 3, No. 4, No. 5, and No. 7 mines. The parties proposed a settlement that reduced the total penalties from $18,125 to $10,754, vacated six citations, and removed the Significant and Substantial designations from specified citations. Judge Gary Melick found the settlement appropriate under the Mine Act's penalty criteria and approved it. The company was ordered to pay $10,754 within 30 days.
Decision snapshot
- Cited provisions: 30 U.S.C. §§ 815(d) and 820(i)
- Outcome: The settlement was approved, total penalties were reduced to $10,754, six citations were vacated, and specified Significant and Substantial designations were removed.
- Key point: The judge approved a negotiated resolution that reduced penalties and changed the status of specified citations and designations.
Full text (FMSHRC public release)
Page 2
~2036
SECRETARY OF LABOR, : CIVIL PENALTY PROCEEDINGS
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH :
ADMINISTRATION (MSHA), : Docket No. SE 92-226
Petitioner : A.C. No. 01-00758-03838
v. : No. 3 Mine
:
JIM WALTER RESOURCES, INC., : Docket No. SE 92-227
Respondent : A.C. No. 01-01247-03957
:
: Docket No. SE 92-228
: A.C. No. 01-01247-03958
:
: Docket No. SE 92-230
: A.C. No. 01-01247-03959
:
: Docket No. SE 92-238
: A.C. No. 01-01247-03962
:
: No. 4 Mine
:
: Docket No. SE 92-239
: A.C. No. 01-01322-03837
:
: Docket No. SE 92-250
: A.C. No. 01-01322-03839
:
: No. 5 Mine
:
: Docket No. SE 92-219
: A.C. No. 01-01401-03866
:
: Docket No. SE 92-229
: A.C. No. 01-01401-03871
:
: Docket No. SE 92-241
: A.C. No. 01-01401-03872
:
: Docket No. SE 92-242
: A.C. No. 01-01401-03873
:
: Docket No. SE 92-243
: A.C. No. 01-01401-03874
:
: Docket No. SE 92-251
: A.C. No. 01-01401-03875
Page 3
~2037
: Docket No. SE 92-272
:
: A.C. No. 01-01401-03878
:
: Docket No. SE 92-278
: A.C. No. 01-01401-03879
:
: Docket No. SE 92-296
: A.C. No. 01-01401-03883
:
: Docket No. SE 92-300
: A.C. No. 01-01401-03882
:
: Docket No. SE 92-301
: A.C. No. 01-01401-03884
:
: Docket No. SE 92-342
: A.C. No. 01-01401-03891
:
: No. 7 Mine
DECISION
Appearances: William Lawson, Esquire, Office of the Solicitor,
U.S. Department of Labor, Arlington, Virginia,
for Petitioner;
R. Stanley Morrow, Esq., Mining Division,
Jim Walter Resources, Inc., Brookwood, Alabama,
for Respondents
Before: Judge Melick
These cases are before me upon petitions for assessment
of civil penalty under Section 105(d) of the Federal Mine
Safety and Health Act of 1977 (the "Act"). At hearings,
Petitioner filed motions to approve settlement agreements
and to dismiss the cases. A reduction in total penalties
from $18,125 to $10,754, the vacation of Citation Nos. 3191450,
3191451, 3191544, 3191574, 2804674 and 3008118, and removal
of the "significant and substantial" designations for the
specified citations have been proposed. I have considered
the representations and documentation submitted in these
cases before and at hearings, and I conclude that the
proffered settlement is appropriate under the criteria
set forth in Section 110(i) of the Act.
Page 4
~2038
WHEREFORE, the motion for approval of settlement
is GRANTED, including the Secretary's removal of her
"significant and substantial" findings as requested, and
it is ORDERED that Respondent pay a penalty of $10,754
within 30 days of this order.
Gary Melick
Administrative Law Judge
703-756-6261
Distribution:
William Lawson, Esq., Office of the Solicitor, U.S. Department
of Labor, 2015 Second Avenue North, Suite 201, Birmingham, AL
35203 (Certified Mail)
R. Stanley Morrow, Esq., Jim Walter Resources, Inc.,
P.O. Box 133, Brookwood, AL 35444 (Certified Mail)
/lh
Get today's answer for your situation
You just read what one judge decided for one employer in 1992, and it binds only those parties. Ezel checks the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent and answers your specific situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.