Mayland Stone Company, Inc.
Mayland Stone Company, Inc. (FMSHRC SE 89-96-M): $600 settlement approved
Apply this to your situation
This order from 1990 bound only the parties to this case; it isn't precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
Mayland Stone operated a crushed stone facility with 10 employees on one shift. The case involved a berm-standard violation under 30 C.F.R. § 56.9300, and the Secretary and Mayland agreed that the company would pay the originally assessed $600 penalty. Judge James A. Broderick noted that the violation was serious and caused by the company’s negligence. He also considered the company’s size, 80,550 mine work hours during 1988, and its seven paid violations during the prior two years, including one berm violation. Applying the statutory penalty criteria, he approved the settlement and ordered payment within 30 days.
Decision snapshot
- Cited standard: 30 C.F.R. § 56.9300
- Outcome: The settlement was approved, and Mayland Stone was ordered to pay $600 within 30 days.
- Key point: A settlement amount may be approved after considering the seriousness and negligence of the violation, the operator’s size, work hours, and violation history.
Full text (FMSHRC public release)
CCASE:
SOL (MSHA) V. MAYLAND STONE
DDATE:
19900209
TTEXT:
Page 2
~218
Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission (F.M.S.H.R.C.)
Office of Administrative Law Judges
SECRETARY OF LABOR, CIVIL PENALTY PROCEEDING
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH
ADMINISTRATION (MSHA), Docket No. SE 89-96-M
PETITIONER A.C. No. 31-01568-05507
v. Daybook Mine
MAYLAND STONE COMPANY, INC.,
RESPONDENT
DECISION APPROVING SETTLEMENT
Appearances: Ken Welsch, Esq., Office of the Solicitor,
U.S. Department of Labor, Atlanta, Georgia,
for the Secretary of Labor; Lloyd Hise, Jr., Esq.,
Spruce Pine, North Carolina, for Mayland Stone
Company, Inc.
Before: Judge Broderick
The above case was called for hearing on February 6, 1990,
in Asheville, North Carolina. The Secretary made a motion on the
record that a settlement agreement between the parties, whereby
Respondent would pay the amount originally assessed, $600, be
approved by the Commission.
Respondent operates a crushed stone facility. It employs 10
persons on one shift. During 1988, 80,550 man hours were worked
at the mine. During the two years prior to the violation involved
in this proceeding, Respondent had 7 paid violations of mandatory
standards, including one violation of the berm standard, 30
C.F.R. 56.9300, which is involved herein. The violation in this
case was serious and was caused by Respondent's negligence. I
have considered the motion in the light of the criteria in
section 110(i) of the Act and conclude that it should be
approved.
Accordingly, the settlement is APPROVED and Respondent is
ORDERED TO PAY the sum of $600 within 30 days of the date of this
order.
James A. Broderick
Administrative Law Judge
Get today's answer for your situation
You just read what one judge decided for one employer in 1990, and it binds only those parties. Ezel checks the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent and answers your specific situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.