Jim Walter Resources, Inc. (ALJ decision, August 13, 1986)
Jim Walter Resources, Inc. (FMSHRC SE 86-67): Three electrical and fire hazard citations settled for $2,400
Apply this to your situation
This order from 1986 bound only the parties to this case; it isn't precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
The Secretary proposed three penalties against Jim Walter Resources for conditions at its No. 4 Mine. The citations concerned an inadequately insulated scoop charger cable, combustible material accumulated near a charging station, and a damaged scoop charger with exposed electrical parts. The parties proposed to settle each citation for its original $800 assessment. Judge Paul Merlin approved the settlements and ordered the operator to pay $2,400. He warned that three serious violations on one day called for greater care and that higher penalties could be needed if similar violations came before him again.
Decision snapshot
- Cited standards: 30 C.F.R. §§ 75.517, 75.400, and 75.512.
- Outcome: Three settlements approved at $800 each; $2,400 total.
- Key point: The judge accepted the full assessed amounts but warned that similar future violations could require higher penalties.
Full text (FMSHRC public release)
FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION 1730 K STREET NW, 6TH FLOOR
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20006
AUG 13 1986
SECRETARY OF LABOR, : CIVIL PENALTY PROCEEDING
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH : :
ADMINISTRATION (MSHA), : Docket No. SE 86-67
Petitioner : A.C. No. 01-01247-03701
:
v. : No. 4 Mine
:
JIM WALTER RESOURCES, INC., :
Respondent :
DECISION
Appearances:' William Lawson, Esq., Office of the Solicitor, U.S. Department of Labor, Birmingham, Alabama, for Petitioner; R. Stanley Morrow, Esq., and Harold D. Rice, Esq., Birmingham, Alabama, for Respondent.
Before: Judge Merlin
This case is a petition for the assessment of three civil penalties filed by the Secretary of Labor against Jim Walter Resources, Inc.
At the hearing the Solicitor advised that the parties proposed to settle the violations for the full assessed amounts as follows: Citation 2605565 was issued for a violation of 30 C.F.R. § 75.517 because the power cable from the scoop charger to batteries that were being charged on the 010 section,, was not insulated adequately and fully protected. The gravity of the violation was serious because a miner contacting the bare, energized conductors could receive a serious electrical shock. In addition, the violation resulted from the operator's negligence. The proposed settlement was for the original amount of $800.
Citation No. 2605566 was issued for a violation of 30 C.F.R.
§ 75.400 because combustible materials were permitted to accumulate at a scoop charging station. The gravity of the violation was serious, because oil, coal and oil-soaked coal were permitted to accumulate on the footwall. Power cables were coiled on top of the combustible materials which could have provided an ignition source for the accumulation. A fire could cause a miner in the area to be exposed to smoke inhalation and
1226
other fire hazards. The operator was plainly negligent in allowing this condition to occur. The proposed settlement was for the original amount'of $800.
Citation No. 2605567 was issued for a violation of 30 C.F.R. § 75.512 because the scoop charger on the 010 section was not maintained in a safe operating condition. The violation was serious, because the charger had been hit, causing the control panels on each side to be loose, exposing the bare electrical components inside the charger. Furthermore, the doors were damaged and would not close. A miner contacting the bare components could receive a serious electrical shock. The operator was negligent because the violation was obvious. The proposed settlement was for $800.
Information was provided regarding the remaining statutory criteria set forth in section 110(i)..
As I advised operator's counsel at the hearing, the occurrence of three such serious violations on the same day in the same mine is a cause for very serious concern. Greater care must be taken. If a case such as this involving this operator comes before me in the future I will not approve settlements of even these substantial amounts because it will then be clear that even greater deterrence in the form of higher penalties is needed.
Because the recommended settlements are for substantial amounts which appear adequately to effectuate the statutory purposes in this instance, said settlements are APPROVED and the operator is ORDERED TO PAY $2400 within 30 days from the date of this decision.
Paul Merlin
Chief Administratiave Law Judge
1227
Distribution:
William Lawson, Esq., U.S. Department of Labor, Office of the Solicitor, Suite 201, 2015 Second Avenue North, Birmingham, AL 35203 (Certified Mail) Harold D. Rice, Esq., R. Stanley Morrow, Esq., Jim Walter Resources, Inc., P.O. Box C-79, Birmingham, AL 35283 (Certified Mail) H. Gerald Reynolds, Esq., Jim Walter Corp., 1500 Dale Mabry Hwy., Tampa, FL 33607 (Certified Mail) slk
1228
What applies to your situation today?
This order bound one employer. Ezel checks the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent against your facts, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace