Jim Walter Resources, Inc. (ALJ decision, July 8, 1987)
Jim Walter Resources, Inc. (FMSHRC SE 86-29-R): Contest dismissed after order vacated
Apply this to your situation
This order from 1987 bound only the parties to this case; it isn't precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
Jim Walter Resources, Inc. contested Order No. 2605648 concerning its No. 3 Mine. After a Commission decision in a related case, MSHA vacated the order. The operator withdrew its request for a hearing, and Judge Paul Merlin dismissed the contest.
Decision snapshot
- Cited standards: None stated in the order.
- Outcome: The contest was dismissed after MSHA vacated the order at issue.
- Key point: A contest became moot when MSHA vacated the order and the operator withdrew its hearing request.
Full text (FMSHRC public release)
CCASE:
JIM RESOURCES V. SOL (MSHA)
DDATE:
19870708
TTEXT:
Page 2
~1219
Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission Office of Administrative Law Judges
JIM WALTER RESOURCES, INC.,
CONTEST PROCEEDING
CONTESTANT
Docket No. SE 86-29-R
v. Order No. 2605648; 12/2/85
SECRETARY OF LABOR,
No. 3 Mine
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH
ADMINISTRATION (MSHA),
RESPONDENT
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
Before: Judge Merlin
In light of the Commission's decision in Jim Walter Resources, Inc. v. Secretary of Labor, 9 FMSHRC 903 (1987), the Solicitor advises MSHA is vacating Order No. 2605648 which is the subject of the above-captioned case. In addition, the operator states that it withdraws its request for hearing.
Accordingly, this case is DISMISSED.
Paul Merlin
Chief Administrative Law Judge
What applies to your situation today?
This order bound one employer. Ezel checks the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent against your facts, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace