Secretary of Labor (MSHA) v. Vulcan Materials Company, Southeast Division (ALJ decision, December 22, 1983)
Secretary of Labor (MSHA) v. Vulcan Materials Company, Southeast Division (FMSHRC SE 84-7-M): $4,000 electrical safety settlement approved
Apply this to your situation
This order from 1983 bound only the parties to this case; it isn't precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
MSHA issued two citations after a miner was fatally electrocuted while grasping a conveyor belt's emergency stop switch at Vulcan Materials' Kennesaw Quarry and Plant. The switch was not frame grounded or properly mounted, and movement of its housing had damaged the conductors entering it. The parties proposed settling both citations for their original assessments of $3,000 and $1,000. Judge Paul Merlin found the violations exceptionally grave but considered the reported low negligence and absence of prior violations of the cited standards. He approved the $4,000 settlement and ordered payment within 30 days.
Decision snapshot
- Cited standards: 30 C.F.R. § 56.12-25, grounding, and § 56.12-2, proper mounting of the emergency stop switch.
- Outcome: Settlement of both citations approved at $3,000 and $1,000, totaling $4,000.
- Key point: The judge approved the original assessments after weighing the fatal accident, low reported negligence, and compliance history.
Full text (FMSHRC public release)
CCASE:
SOL (MSHA) V. VULCAN MATERIALS
DDATE:
19831222
TTEXT:
~2219
Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission Office of Administrative Law Judges
SECRETARY OF LABOR,
CIVIL PENALTY PROCEEDING
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH
ADMINISTRATION (MSHA),
Docket No. SE 84-7-M
PETITIONER
A.C. No. 09-00067-05503
v. Kennesaw Quarry and Plant
VULCAN MATERIALS COMPANY -
SOUTHEAST DIVISION,
RESPONDENT
DECISION APPROVING SETTLEMENT
Before: Judge Merlin
The parties have filed a motion to approve settlement in the above-captioned proceeding. The parties propose to settle the two citations at issue in this case for the original assessments total of $4,000.
Citation No. 2243958 was issued for a violation of 30 C.F.R.
56.12-25 because the emergency stop switch for a conveyor bel was not frame-grounded. A miner was electrocuted when he grasped the actuating lever of the emergency stop switch. The accident was caused by an electrical fault at the stop switch which occurred due to strain and flexing of the conductors entering the switch housing. The single bolt securing the switch to the wall was not sufficient to prevent movement of the switch when the cord was pulled. Consequently, the cable pulled out of the strain clamp and the bare or damaged conductors contacted the switch frame. The parties advise that negligence was low because the status of the grounding was not visually apparent and had not been detected despite previous diligent inspections by the operator. The violation was abated in good faith. The mine is medium in size and the operator is large. There is no history of prior violations of the cited standard. Payment of the penalty will have no significant effect on the operator's ability to remain in business. The parties propose to settle this citation for the original assessment of $3,000.
~2220
Citation No. 2243959 was issued for a violation of 30 C.F.R.
56.12-2 because the emergency stop switch for a conveyor belt was not properly mounted. The violation contributed to the fatality described above. The parties advise that negligence was low. The remainder of the statutory criteria set forth in section 110(i) of the Act are as described above. The parties propose to settle this citation for the original assessment of $1,000.
I have very carefully reviewed the settlement motion and supporting materials. Although the violations are exceptionally grave, I note the low degree of negligence and absence of prior violations of the cited standards. Inasmuch as both assessments are substantial amounts, I conclude the recommended settlements are appropriate in this case. The recommended settlements are therefore, approved.
ORDER
The operator is ORDERED to pay $4,000 within 30 days from the date of this decision.
Paul Merlin
Chief Administrative Law Judge
What applies to your situation today?
This order bound one employer. Ezel checks the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent against your facts, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace