FMSHRC ALJ decision Docket SE 2024-0060 Decided December 22, 2023 Procedural Judge John T. Sullivan

Secretary of Labor obo Samuel Coleman v. Warrior Met Coal Mining, LLC

Secretary of Labor obo Samuel Coleman v. Warrior Met Coal Mining (FMSHRC SE 2024-0060): Economic temporary reinstatement approved

Apply this to your situation

This order from 2023 bound only the parties to this case; it isn't precedent. Ezel answers your situation under the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent, with citations.

Temporary-reinstatement order, not Commission precedent
This order changed the form of interim relief while the underlying discrimination matter continued. It did not resolve the merits or become a final decision under the 40-day rule in 30 U.S.C. § 823(d)(1). It is not Commission precedent. The full text below is from the official FMSHRC release.
About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official FMSHRC release. The full text is the Commission's own document.
Read the official release (fmshrc.gov)

Plain-English summary

The judge had ordered Warrior Met Coal Mining to temporarily reinstate Samuel Coleman on December 12, 2023. Nine days later, the parties jointly asked to replace actual reinstatement with an economic temporary-reinstatement agreement retroactive to the original order date. The judge found that the agreement did not reduce Coleman's rights under section 105(c)(2). He granted the joint motion and converted the earlier order to temporary economic reinstatement. The order provided interim relief and did not decide the underlying discrimination claim.

Decision snapshot

  • Cited authority: 30 U.S.C. § 815(c)(2)
  • Outcome: The joint motion was granted, converting actual temporary reinstatement to economic temporary reinstatement.
  • Key point: Parties may substitute economic reinstatement when the agreed terms preserve the miner's temporary-reinstatement rights.

Full text (FMSHRC public release)

FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION

OFFICE OF THE CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE

1331 PENNSYLVANIA AVE., N.W., SUITE 520N

WASHINGTON, DC 20004-1710

TELEPHONE: 202-434-9900 / FAX: 202-434-9949

|
SECRETARY OF LABOR MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION (MSHA), on behalf of SAMUEL COLEMAN, Complainant
v.
WARRIOR MET COAL MINING, LLC, Respondent |
|
|
TEMPORARY REINSTATEMENT
Docket No. SE 2024-0060 MSHA Case No. SE-MD-24-03
Mine: No. 7 Mine Mine ID: 01-01401 |
|
|
|
|
|



ORDER GRANTING JOINT MOTION FOR ECONOMIC TEMPORARY REINSTATEMENT

Before: Judge Sullivan

On
December 12, 2023, I granted the Secretary of Labor’s unopposed Application for
Temporary Reinstatement of Complainant Samuel Coleman. Pursuant to section
105(c)(2) of the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977, 30 U.S.C. § 801, et
seq., and 29 C.F.R. § 2700.45, I ordered Complainant’s immediate
temporary reinstatement to positions at the No. 7 Mine of Warrior Met Coal
Mining, LLC.

On December 21, 2023, the parties jointly moved for an order approving their agreement to economically temporarily reinstate the Complainant in lieu of the actual temporary reinstatement ordered on December 12. Their motion details the terms of the economic reinstatement agreement reached by the parties, retroactive to the date of my original order.

Because nothing in the motion’s description of the terms of the agreement appears to reduce Complainant’s rights under section 105(c)(2), the motion is granted, and my December 12 order is converted to an order of temporary economic reinstatement retroactive to that date. All other provisions of that order remain in effect.

/s/
John T. Sullivan

John T. Sullivan

Administrative Law Judge

Distribution:

Colleen E. Howard & Jean C. Abreu, Office of the
Solicitor, U.S. Department of Labor, 61 Forsyth Street, S.W., Room 7T10,
Atlanta, GA 30303 ([email protected])
([email protected])

Atlanta Docket ([email protected])

W. Brock Phillips & John B. Holmes, III, MAYNARD NEXSEN,
P.C., 1901 Sixth Avenue North, Suite 1700, Birmingham, AL 35203 ([email protected]) ([email protected])

Samuel Coleman ([email protected])

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read what one judge decided for one employer in 2023, and it binds only those parties. Ezel checks the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.