Secretary of Labor obo Brandon Hall v. Warrior Met Coal Company, LLC

Plain-English summary

Brandon Hall raised safety concerns about a missing fire extinguisher, worn shearer bits, elevated methane, and thick gob while operating a longwall at Warrior Met Coal's No. 7 Mine. Management later suspended him for stopping production, reduced the discipline to a two-week suspension and probation, and then fired him after a later dispute over cleaning a bus. Warrior Met did not request a hearing on the Secretary's temporary-reinstatement application. Judge John T. Sullivan found the allegations supplied reasonable cause to believe the discrimination complaint had merit without deciding the ultimate claim. He ordered Hall immediately returned to his former job with the same pay, overtime, and benefits.

Decision snapshot

• Cited authority: 30 U.S.C. §§ 815(c)(1), 815(c)(2), and 815(c)(3)
• Outcome: Brandon Hall was ordered immediately temporarily reinstated to his former job and compensation.
• Key point: Safety complaints followed by production-related discipline and termination supported interim relief at the nonfrivolous stage.

Full text (FMSHRC public release)

FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION

FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION

OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE
LAW JUDGES

1331 Pennsylvania Ave.
NW, Suite 520N

TELEPHONE: (202)434-9958
/ FAX: (202)434-9949

SECRETARY OF LABOR

MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH    

ADMINISTRATION (MSHA),

on behalf of BRANDON HALL,

Complainant,

v.

WARRIOR MET COAL COMPANY,

LLC,

Respondent

TEMPORARY REINSTATEMENT

PROCEEDING

Docket No. SE 2021-0118

MSHA Case No.: SE-MD 2021-01

Mine: No. 7 Mine

Mine ID: 01-01401

ORDER GRANTING TEMPORARY REINSTATEMENT

OF BRANDON HALL

Before:            Judge Sullivan

Pursuant
to Section 105(c)(2) of the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977 (“Act”),
30 U.S.C. §801, et. seq. , and 29 C.F.R. §2700.45, on April 30, 2021, the
Secretary of Labor (“Secretary”) filed an Application for Temporary
Reinstatement of miner Brandon Hall (“Complainant”) to his former position as a
longwall operator with Warrior Met Coal Company, LLC (“Respondent”) at its Mine
No. 7. Here, the Secretary’s application satisfies the procedural
requirements of Commission Procedural Rule 45(b), as, among other things, it
timely “ states the Secretary’s
finding that the miner’s discrimination complaint was not frivolously
brought[,] accompanied by an affidavit setting forth the Secretary’s reasons
supporting his finding[,] and includes a copy of the miner’s complaint to the
Secretary . . .” 29 C.F.R. §2700.45(b). [1]

According
to Commission Rule 45(c), a request for hearing must be filed within 10 days
following receipt of the Secretary’s application for temporary reinstatement.
29 C.F.R. §2700.45(c). The application’s certificate of service states that it
was served on Respondent by electronic mail on April 30. On May 10, 2021, Respondent
contacted the Court and stated that it does not intend to request a hearing on
temporary reinstatement. Consequently, I review the contents of the Secretary’s
application to determine whether the complaint in this instance “was not
frivolously brought.” Id.

Section 105(c)(1) of the Mine Act
provides that “[n]o person shall discharge . . . any miner . . . because such
miner . . . has filed or made a complaint under or related to this Act,
including a complaint notifying the operator . . . of an alleged danger or
safety or health violation in a . . . mine . . . .” 30 U.S.C. § 815(c)(1). In
his Application, as supported by his investigator’s affidavit, the Secretary
alleges the following to establish the Complaint as having been not frivolously
brought under section 105(c)(1) & (2):

(1)   
During his January 25, 2021 shift, the Complainant raised with
Respondent’s agents a number of safety issues with respect to the operation of
the longwall that day, such as the lack of a required fire extinguisher,
shearer bits that needed to be replaced, elevated methane levels, and thick gob
in the pathway of the section where he worked. The foregoing adversely impacted
the progress of the longwall shearer during the shift;

(2)   
Respondent’s agents subsequently reacted negatively to the speed at
which the Complainant was working throughout the shift; and

(3)    At the end of the
shift, Complainant was suspended for five days, with intent to discharge, for
having “stopp[ed] coal production.” That punishment was later reduced to a
two-week suspension to be followed by a 30-working day probationary period. After
returning to work on February 8, 2021, Complainant, on March 15, 2021 (thus
apparently prior to the end of his probation), was fired for failing, at the
end of a shift, to follow orders and personally clean a bus he and two other
miners had been using.

There being no opposition to the
Application, I agree with the Secretary that it establishes the Complaint to
have been “not frivolously brought” in this instance. See Jim Walters Res.,
Inc. v. FMSHRC , 920 F.2d 738, 747 (11th Cir. 1990) (in light of Mine Act
legislative history and the Supreme Court’s treatment of a similar
whistleblower protection provision, interpreting the “not frivolously brought”
standard to be the equivalent of a “reasonable cause to believe” standard and
to be met when a miner’s “complaint appears to have merit”). Accordingly, the
Application is granted. I reach no conclusion beyond that regarding the merits
of the Complaint.

ORDER

It is hereby ORDERED that BRANDON HALL be immediately
TEMPORARILY REINSTATED to his former job at his former rate of pay,
overtime, and all benefits he was receiving at the time of his termination.

This Order SHALL remain in effect until such time as
there is a final determination in this matter by hearing and decision, approval
of settlement, or other order of this court or the Commission.

I
retain jurisdiction over this temporary reinstatement proceeding. 29 C.F.R. §
2700.45(e)(4). Given that that the Mine Act directs that both the Secretary and
the Commission act expeditiously in section 105(c) proceedings, the Secretary SHALL
provide a report on the status of the underlying discrimination complaint as
soon as possible . Counsel for the Secretary SHALL also immediately
notify my office of any settlement or of any determination that the
Respondent did not violate Section 105(c) of the Act.

/s/
John T. Sullivan

John
T. Sullivan

Administrative
Law Judge

Distribution:

Nicholas
C. Hall, Esq., Office of the Solicitor, U. S. Department of Labor 61 Forsyth
Street, S.W., Room 7T10, Atlanta, GA 30303 ( [email protected] )

Gregory
Willis, Special Investigator, U.S. Department of Labor, MSHA, Birmingham, AL ( [email protected] )

Guy
W. Hensley, Esq., Warrior Met Coal Mining, LLC, 16243 Highway 216, Birmingham,
AL 3544 ( [email protected] )           

Allen
B. Bennett, Esq., Maynard Cooper, Gale, PC, 2400 Regions/Harbert Plaza, 1901
6th Avenue North, Birmingham, AL 35203 ( [email protected] )

Jack
Jacobs, Esq., Maples, Tucker, and Jacobs LLC, 2001 Park Place North, Suite 1325,
Birmingham, AL 35203 ( [email protected] )

Brandon
Hall, 1121 48th Street Birmingham, Alabama 35208 ( [email protected] )

[1]
The Discrimination Complaint (“Complaint”) filed with the Secretary’s Mine
Safety and Health Administration by the Complainant is dated March 24, 2021. It
was filed within 60 days of the Complainant’s March 15 termination of
employment. Section 105(c)(3) directs the Secretary to determine whether a
section 105(c) violation occurred within 90 days, which in this instance would
be no later than June 22, 2021.