CVB Industrial Contracting, Inc. (Commission decision, April 8, 2013)
CVB Industrial Contracting, Inc. (FMSHRC SE 2011-385-M): Default vacated after response was sent to MSHA
Apply this precedent to your situation
This is citable Commission precedent from 2013, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.
Plain-English summary
CVB Industrial Contracting defaulted after the Commission did not receive its answer to a show-cause order. The operator had responded on time but mistakenly sent the response to MSHA instead of the Commission, and the Secretary did not oppose reopening. In the interest of justice, the Commission vacated the default and remanded the case for further proceedings.
Decision snapshot
- Governing authority: 30 U.S.C. § 823(d); 29 C.F.R. §§ 2700.1(b), 2700.69(b), and 2700.70(a)
- Outcome: The default order was vacated and the penalty proceeding was remanded.
- Key point: A timely response sent to the wrong agency office supported relief from default.
Full text (FMSHRC public release)
FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION
1331 PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE, NW, SUITE 520N
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20004-1710
April 8, 2013
SECRETARY OF LABOR,
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH
ADMINISTRATION (MSHA)
v.
CVB INDUSTRIAL CONTRACTING, INC.
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
Docket No. SE 2011-385-M
A.C. No. 09-00111-247298
BEFORE: Jordan, Chairman; Young and Nakamura, Commissioners
ORDER
BY THE COMMISSION:
This matter arises under the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977, 30 U.S.C.
§ 801 et seq. (2006) (“Mine Act”). On August 28, 2012, the Commission received from CVB Industrial Contracting, Inc. (“CVB”) a motion seeking to reopen a penalty assessment proceeding and relieve it from the default order entered against it.
On October 5, 2011, Chief Administrative Law Judge Lesnick issued an Order to Show Cause which by its terms became a Default Order if the operator did not file an answer within 30 days. This Order to Show Cause was issued in response to CVB’s failure to answer the Secretary’s April 21, 2011 Petition for Assessment of Civil Penalty. The Commission did not receive CVB’s answer within 30 days, so the default order became effective on November 7, 2011.
CVB asserts that “information concerning this citation and supporting documentation was sent to the wrong places to be reviewed.” The Secretary does not oppose the request to reopen. The Secretary encloses a copy of CVB’s timely response to the Show Cause Order, which was mistakenly mailed to MSHA, but not the Commission on October 18, 2011.
The judge’s jurisdiction in this matter terminated when the default occurred. 29 C.F.R.
§ 2700.69(b). Under the Mine Act and the Commission’s procedural rules, relief from a judge’s decision may be sought by filing a petition for discretionary review within 30 days of its issuance. 30 U.S.C. § 823(d)(2)(A)(i); 29 C.F.R. § 2700.70(a). If the Commission does not direct review within 40 days of a decision’s issuance, it becomes a final decision of the Commission. 30 U.S.C. § 823(d)(1). Consequently, the judge’s order here has become a final decision of the Commission.
In evaluating requests to reopen final orders, the Commission has found guidance in Rule 60(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure under which, for example, a party could be entitled to relief from a final order of the Commission on the basis of mistake, inadvertence, or excusable neglect. See 29 C.F.R. § 2700.1(b) (“the Commission and its Judges shall be guided so far as practicable by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure”); Jim Walter Res., Inc., 15 FMSHRC 782, 786-89 (May 1993) (“JWR”). We have also observed that default is a harsh remedy and that, if the defaulting party can make a showing of good cause for a failure to timely respond, the case may be reopened and appropriate proceedings on the merits permitted. See Coal Prep. Servs., Inc., 17 FMSHRC 1529, 1530 (Sept. 1995).
Having reviewed CVB’s request and the Secretary’s response, in the interest of justice, we hereby reopen the proceeding and vacate the Default Order. Accordingly, this case is remanded to the Chief Administrative Law Judge for further proceedings pursuant to the Mine Act and the Commission’s Procedural Rules, 29 C.F.R. Part 2700.
/s/ Mary Lu Jordan
Mary Lu Jordan, Commissioner
/s/ Michael G. Young
Michael G. Young, Commissioner
/s/ Patrick K. Nakamura
Patrick K. Nakamura, Commissioner
Distribution:
Heath A. Claxton
EHS Manager
CVB Industrial Contracting, Inc.
559 Panther Branch Road
P.O. Box 1055
Sandersville, Georgia 31082
W. Christian Schumann, Esq.
Office of the Solicitor
U.S. Department of Labor
1100 Wilson Blvd., Room 2220
Arlington, VA 22209-2296
Melanie Garris
Office of Civil Penalty Compliance
MSHA
U.S. Dept. Of Labor
1100 Wilson Blvd., 25th Floor
Arlington, VA 22209-3939
Chief Administrative Law Judge Robert J. Lesnick
Federal Mine Safety & Health Review Commission
1331 Pennsylvania Avenue, N. W., Suite 520N
Washington, D.C. 20004-1710
Does this precedent still control your case?
Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and applies it to your situation with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace