Robles Aggregates, Inc.
Robles Aggregates, Inc. (FMSHRC SE 2010-119-M): Default vacated where petition delivery could not be verified
Apply this precedent to your situation
This is citable Commission precedent from 2012, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.
Plain-English summary
Robles Aggregates asked the Commission to reopen a penalty case after an unanswered show-cause order became a default. The operator said it had timely contested the penalties and received no later communication until the Treasury Department contacted it about the debt. The Secretary did not oppose reopening and reported that the regional office file contained nothing showing whether the penalty petition had been delivered. In the interest of justice, the Commission reopened the proceeding, vacated the default, and remanded the case for further proceedings.
Decision snapshot
- Governing authority: 30 U.S.C. § 801 et seq.; Commission Procedural Rules
- Outcome: The default order was vacated and the penalty proceeding was remanded to the Chief ALJ.
- Key point: Reopening may be appropriate when the record cannot verify delivery of the penalty petition and the Secretary does not oppose relief.
Full text (FMSHRC public release)
FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION
601 NEW JERSEY AVENUE, NW
SUITE 9500
WASHINGTON, DC 20001
June 26, 2012
SECRETARY OF LABOR,
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH
ADMINISTRATION (MSHA)
v.
ROBLES AGGREGATES, INC.
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
Docket No. SE 2010-119-M
A.C. No. 54-00057-199026
BEFORE: Jordan, Chairman; Duffy, Young, Cohen, and Nakamura, Commissioners
ORDER
BY THE COMMISSION:
This matter arises under the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977, 30 U.S.C.
§ 801 et seq. (2006) (“Mine Act”). On November 18, 2011, the Commission received from
Robles Aggregates, Inc. (“Robles”) a motion seeking to reopen a penalty assessment proceeding
and relieve it from the order of default entered against it.
On March 17, 2011, Chief Administrative Law Judge Lesnick issued an Order to Show
Cause which by its terms became an Order of Default if the operator did not file an answer within
30 days. This Order to Show Cause was issued in response to Robles’ failure to answer the
Secretary’s March 29, 2010 Petition for Assessment of Civil Penalty. The Commission did not
receive Robles’ answer within 30 days, so the default order became effective on April 18, 2011.
Robles asserts that it timely contested the penalties. Robles also states that it had not
received any communication until it was contacted by the U.S. Department of Treasury regarding
its debt. In order to ensure accurate delivery in the future, Robles modified its address on the
legal identity report.
The Secretary does not oppose the request to reopen and notes that the Atlanta Regional
Office attorney indicated that there is nothing in the file to verify whether or not the penalty
petition was delivered to the operator.
Having reviewed Robles’ request and the Secretary’s response, in the interest of justice,
we hereby reopen the proceeding and vacate the Order of Default. Accordingly, this case is
remanded to the Chief Administrative Law Judge for further proceedings pursuant to the Mine
Act and the Commission’s Procedural Rules, 29 C.F.R. Part 2700.
/s/ Mary Lu Jordan
Mary Lu Jordan, Chairman
/s/ Michael F. Duffy
Michael F. Duffy, Commissioner
/s/ Michael G. Young
Michael G. Young, Commissioner
/s/ Robert F. Cohen, Jr.
Robert F. Cohen, Jr., Commissioner
/s/ Patrick K. Nakamura
&Patrick K. Nakamura, Commissioner
Distribution:
Juan Raul Robles, President
Robles Aggregates, Inc.
Carr. 14 KM. 9.6
Flamboyan Ave #7
Coto Laurel, PR 00780
W. Christian Schumann, Esq.
Office of the Solicitor
U.S. Department of Labor
1100 Wilson Blvd., Room 2220
Arlington, VA 22209-2296
Melanie Garris
Office of Civil Penalty Compliance
MSHA
U.S. Dept. Of Labor
1100 Wilson Blvd., 25th Floor
Arlington, VA 22209-3939
Chief Administrative Law Judge Robert J. Lesnick
Federal Mine Safety & Health Review Commission
601 New Jersey Avenue, N. W., Suite 9500
Washington, D.C. 20001-2021
Get today's answer for your situation
You just read Commission precedent from 2012. Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and answers your specific situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.