Giant Cement Holding Company (Commission decision, November 22, 2010)
Giant Cement Holding Company (FMSHRC SE 2009-65-M): Miscaptioned answer defeats default
Apply this precedent to your situation
This is citable Commission precedent from 2010, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.
Plain-English summary
An ALJ entered default against Giant Cement for failing to answer the Secretary's penalty petition. Giant Cement showed that it had timely filed an answer, but the caption mistakenly listed a different docket number. The Commission's internal review confirmed that the answer had been received and placed in the other docket's file. Giant Cement also had timely responded to the ALJ's show-cause order. The Commission granted review, vacated the default in the interest of justice, and remanded for further proceedings.
Decision snapshot
- Governing provisions: 30 U.S.C. § 823(d)(2); 29 C.F.R. §§ 2700.69(b) and 2700.70(a)
- Outcome: The default order was vacated and the penalty case was remanded.
- Key point: A timely answer filed under an incorrect docket caption can justify vacating a default when the record confirms the filing.
Full text (FMSHRC public release)
Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission
FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION
601 NEW JERSEY AVENUE, NW
SUITE 9500
WASHINGTON, DC 20001
November 22, 2010
SECRETARY OF LABOR,
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH
ADMINISTRATION (MSHA)
v.
GIANT CEMENT HOLDING COMPANY
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
Docket No. SE 2009-65-M
A.C. No. 38-00007-165394
BEFORE: Jordan, Chairman; Duffy, Young, Cohen, and Nakamura, Commissioners
DIRECTION FOR REVIEW AND ORDER
BY THE COMMISSION:
This matter arises under the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977, 30 U.S.C.
§ 801 et seq. (2006) (“Mine Act”). On October 9, 2008, the Department of Labor’s Mine Safety and Health Administration (“MSHA”) issued Proposed Assessment No. 000165394 to Giant Cement Holding Company (“Giant Cement”). On December 11, 2008, after Giant Cement had timely contested certain proposed penalties, the Secretary of Labor (“Secretary”) filed a petition for assessment of civil penalty with the Commission regarding those contested penalties. On January 13, 2010, Chief Administrative Law Judge Robert Lesnick issued an Order to Show Cause to Giant Cement for failure to file an answer to the Secretary’s petition. On October 12, 2010, the judge issued an Order of Default entering judgment for the Secretary and directing Giant Cement to pay the proposed civil penalties immediately. On November 10, 2010, the Commission received a petition for discretionary review from Giant Cement, requesting that the Commission issue an order directing review and vacating the default order.
In support of its petition, Giant Cement states that on December 17, 2008, it timely filed its answer to the petition, but acknowledged that the answer’s caption inadvertently referenced Docket No. “SE 2008-1016-M” as opposed to Docket No. SE 2009-65-M. An internal review of the case file for Docket No. SE 2008-1016-M revealed that Giant Cement’s answer referencing contested Citation Nos. 6117058 and 6117065 was, in fact, received by the Commission on December 23, 2008. Giant further states that it timely filed an answer to the show cause order on February 1, 2010, explaining that it had timely filed its answer to the Secretary’s petition. The Commission has not received a response from the Secretary.
The Chief Judge’s jurisdiction over this case terminated when he issued his default order on October 12, 2010. 29 C.F.R. § 2700.69(b). Relief from a judge’s decision may be sought by filing a petition for discretionary review within 30 days of its issuance. 30 U.S.C. § 823(d)(2); 29 C.F.R. § 2700.70(a). We conclude that Giant Cement’s petition for discretionary review was timely filed, and we hereby grant it.
Upon review of the record and an internal review of the case files, in the interest of justice, we hereby vacate the Order of Default and remand this matter to the Chief Judge for further appropriate proceedings. See REB Enterprises, Inc., 18 FMSHRC 311 (Mar. 1996).
Mary Lu Jordan, Chairman
Michael F. Duffy, Commissioner
Michael G. Young, Commissioner
Robert F. Cohen, Jr., Commissioner
Patrick K. Nakamura, Commissioner
Distribution
C. Gregory Ruffenach, Attorney at Law
1629 K Street, N.W., Suite 300
Washington, D.C. 20036
W. Christian Schumann, Esq.
Office of the Solicitor
U.S. Department of Labor
1100 Wilson Blvd., Room 2220
Arlington, VA 22209-2296
Myra James, Chief
Office of Civil Penalty Compliance, MSHA
U.S. Dept. of Labor
1100 Wilson Blvd., 25th Floor
Arlington, VA 22209-3939
Chief Administrative Law Judge Robert J. Lesnick
Federal Mine Safety & Health Review Commission
601 New Jersey Avenue, N.W., Suite 9500
Washington, D.C. 20001-2021
Does this precedent still control your case?
Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and applies it to your situation with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace