CCC Group, Inc. (Commission decision, December 8, 2008)
CCC Group, Inc. (FMSHRC SE 2009-61-M): Timely penalty contest confirmed and reopening docket dismissed
Apply this precedent to your situation
This is citable Commission precedent from 2008, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.
Plain-English summary
CCC Group told the Commission that MSHA was incorrectly treating its penalty contest as late. The matter was initially docketed as a reopening request. The Secretary then acknowledged that MSHA had erred and confirmed that CCC's contest was timely. Because the proposed assessment never became a final Commission order, there was nothing to reopen. The Commission dismissed the docket, and the Secretary stated that a penalty petition would be filed within 45 days.
Decision snapshot
- Governing provision: 30 U.S.C. § 815(a)
- Outcome: The reopening docket was dismissed after the contest was confirmed timely.
- Key point: A timely penalty contest prevents the assessment from becoming final, so reopening relief is unnecessary.
Full text (FMSHRC public release)
Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission
FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION
601 NEW JERSEY AVENUE, NW
SUITE 9500
WASHINGTON, DC 20001
December 8, 2008
SECRETARY OF LABOR,
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH
ADMINISTRATION (MSHA)
v.
CCC GROUP, INC.
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
Docket No. SE 2009-61-M
A.C. No. 08-00768-154205 B96
BEFORE: Duffy, Chairman; Jordan, Young, and Cohen, Commissioners
ORDER
BY THE COMMISSION:
This matter arises under the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977, 30 U.S.C.
§ 801 et seq. (2000) (“Mine Act”). On September 17, 2008, the Commission received from CCC Group, Inc. (“CCC”) a letter maintaining that it had filed a timely contest of a proposed penalty assessment that the Department of Labor’s Mine Safety and Health Administration (“MSHA”) was treating as untimely. Under section 105(a) of the Mine Act, an operator who wishes to contest a proposed penalty must notify the Secretary of Labor no later than 30 days after receiving the proposed penalty assessment. If the operator fails to notify the Secretary, the proposed penalty assessment is deemed a final order of the Commission. 30 U.S.C. § 815(a).
CCC’s letter was originally docketed here as a motion to reopen, but the Secretary of Labor submitted a response to CCC’s letter stating that MSHA had erred in taking its original position, that CCC’s contest was in fact timely filed, and that the Secretary will file a petition for assessment of penalty petition with the Commission and CCC within 45 days. Having reviewed CCC’s letter and the Secretary’s response, we conclude that the proposed assessment at issue has not become a final order of the Commission because CCC timely contested it. Consequently, this docket is dismissed.
______
Michael F. Duffy, Chairman
______
Mary Lu Jordan, Commissioner
______
Michael G. Young, Commissioner
______
Robert F. Cohen, Jr., Commissioner
Distribution:
Gary Klatt, CSP
CCC Group, Inc.
5797 Dietrich Rd.
San Antonio, TX 78219
W. Christian Schumann, Esq.
Office of the Solicitor
U.S. Department of Labor
1100 Wilson Blvd., Room 2220
Arlington, VA 22209-2296
Myra James, Chief
Office of Civil Penalty Compliance
MSHA
U.S. Department of Labor
1100 Wilson Blvd., 25th Floor
Arlington, VA 22209-3939
Chief Administrative Law Judge Robert J. Lesnick
Federal Mine Safety & Health Review Commission
601 New Jersey Avenue, N.W., Suite 9500
Washington, D.C. 20001-2021
Does this precedent still control your case?
Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and applies it to your situation with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace