Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. (Commission decision, January 8, 2009)
Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. (FMSHRC SE 2008-991-M): Reopening docket dismissed after timely contest confirmed
Apply this precedent to your situation
This is citable Commission precedent from 2009, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.
Plain-English summary
Martin Marietta asked to reopen a proposed penalty assessment after MSHA sent a letter saying the company's contest was late. The operator maintained that it had filed on time. MSHA later informed the Commission that it was treating the assessment as validly contested. Because no final Commission order existed to reopen, the Commission dismissed the reopening docket.
Decision snapshot
- Governing provision: 30 U.S.C. § 815(a)
- Outcome: The docket was dismissed because MSHA recognized the assessment as timely contested.
- Key point: Reopening is unnecessary when a timely contest means the proposed assessment never became a final Commission order.
Full text (FMSHRC public release)
Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission
FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION
601 NEW JERSEY AVENUE, NW
SUITE 9500
WASHINGTON, DC 20001
January 8, 2009
SECRETARY OF LABOR,
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH
ADMINISTRATION (MSHA)
v.
MARTIN MARIETTA MATERIALS, INC.
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
Docket No. SE 2008-991-M
A.C. No. 31-02009-155842
BEFORE: Duffy, Chairman; Jordan, Young, and Cohen, Commissioners
ORDER
BY THE COMMISSION:
This matter arises under the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977, 30 U.S.C.
§ 801 et seq. (2000) (“Mine Act”). On September 4, 2008, the Commission received from Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. (“Martin Marietta”) a motion by counsel requesting reopening of a proposed penalty assessment that had become a final order of the Commission pursuant to section 105(a) of the Mine Act, 30 U.S.C. § 815(a).
On July 3, 2008, the Department of Labor’s Mine Safety and Health Administration (“MSHA”) issued Proposed Penalty Assessment No. 000155842 to Martin Marietta. The operator states that it timely contested the proposed assessment. Martin Marietta further submits that, by a letter dated August 26, 2008, MSHA stated that the proposed assessment had not been timely contested.
The Secretary has subsequently informed the Commission that Assessment No. 000155842 is being treated by MSHA as a validly contested assessment. Consequently, there is no final Commission order with respect to this assessment to reopen, and this docket is dismissed.
______
Michael F. Duffy, Chairman
______
Mary Lu Jordan, Commissioner
______
Michael G. Young, Commissioner
______
Robert F. Cohen, Jr., Commissioner
Distribution:
Karen L. Johnston, Esq.
Jackson Kelly PLLC
1099 18th Street, Suite 2150
Denver, CO 80202
W. Christian Schumann, Esq.
Office of the Solicitor
U.S. Department of Labor
1100 Wilson Blvd., Room 2220
Arlington, VA 22209-2296
Myra James, Chief
Office of Civil Penalty Compliance,
MSHA,
U.S. Department of Labor
1100 Wilson Blvd., 25th Floor
Arlington, VA 22209-3939
Chief Administrative Law Judge Robert J. Lesnick
Federal Mine Safety & Health Review Commission
601 New Jersey Avenue, N.W., Suite 9500
Washington, D.C. 20001-2021
Does this precedent still control your case?
Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and applies it to your situation with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace