Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. (Commission decision, January 8, 2009)

Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. (FMSHRC SE 2008-991-M): Reopening docket dismissed after timely contest confirmed

Decision type
Commission decision
Docket
SE 2008-991-M
Decided
January 8, 2009
Outcome
Procedural
Precedential status
Citable Commission precedent
Checked against source
2026-08-08

Apply this precedent to your situation

This is citable Commission precedent from 2009, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.

Currency note: this decision dates from 2009
The MSHA standards may have been amended, penalty amounts have been adjusted, and later Commission or court decisions may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current compliance advice. Verify the current standard before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or penalty mentioned here.
Decision of the Commission
This is a decision of the Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission, the highest level of agency review, citable as Commission precedent. It may have been appealed to a U.S. Court of Appeals after issuance under 30 U.S.C. § 816; check subsequent history before relying on it. The full text below is from the official FMSHRC release.
About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official FMSHRC release. The full text is the agency's own release.
Read the official release (fmshrc.gov)

Plain-English summary

Martin Marietta asked to reopen a proposed penalty assessment after MSHA sent a letter saying the company's contest was late. The operator maintained that it had filed on time. MSHA later informed the Commission that it was treating the assessment as validly contested. Because no final Commission order existed to reopen, the Commission dismissed the reopening docket.

Decision snapshot

  • Governing provision: 30 U.S.C. § 815(a)
  • Outcome: The docket was dismissed because MSHA recognized the assessment as timely contested.
  • Key point: Reopening is unnecessary when a timely contest means the proposed assessment never became a final Commission order.

Full text (FMSHRC public release)

Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission

FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION

601 NEW JERSEY AVENUE, NW

SUITE 9500

WASHINGTON, DC 20001

January 8, 2009

SECRETARY OF LABOR,

MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH

ADMINISTRATION (MSHA)

v.

MARTIN MARIETTA MATERIALS, INC.

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

Docket No. SE 2008-991-M
A.C. No. 31-02009-155842

BEFORE: Duffy, Chairman; Jordan, Young, and Cohen, Commissioners

ORDER

BY THE COMMISSION:

This matter arises under the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977, 30 U.S.C.
§ 801 et seq. (2000) (“Mine Act”). On September 4, 2008, the Commission received from Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. (“Martin Marietta”) a motion by counsel requesting reopening of a proposed penalty assessment that had become a final order of the Commission pursuant to section 105(a) of the Mine Act, 30 U.S.C. § 815(a).

On July 3, 2008, the Department of Labor’s Mine Safety and Health Administration (“MSHA”) issued Proposed Penalty Assessment No. 000155842 to Martin Marietta. The operator states that it timely contested the proposed assessment. Martin Marietta further submits that, by a letter dated August 26, 2008, MSHA stated that the proposed assessment had not been timely contested.

The Secretary has subsequently informed the Commission that Assessment No. 000155842 is being treated by MSHA as a validly contested assessment. Consequently, there is no final Commission order with respect to this assessment to reopen, and this docket is dismissed.

______

Michael F. Duffy, Chairman

______

Mary Lu Jordan, Commissioner

______

Michael G. Young, Commissioner

______

Robert F. Cohen, Jr., Commissioner

Distribution:

Karen L. Johnston, Esq.

Jackson Kelly PLLC

1099 18th Street, Suite 2150

Denver, CO 80202

W. Christian Schumann, Esq.

Office of the Solicitor

U.S. Department of Labor

1100 Wilson Blvd., Room 2220

Arlington, VA 22209-2296

Myra James, Chief

Office of Civil Penalty Compliance,

MSHA,

U.S. Department of Labor

1100 Wilson Blvd., 25th Floor

Arlington, VA 22209-3939

Chief Administrative Law Judge Robert J. Lesnick

Federal Mine Safety & Health Review Commission

601 New Jersey Avenue, N.W., Suite 9500

Washington, D.C. 20001-2021

Does this precedent still control your case?

Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and applies it to your situation with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace