Hosea O. Weaver & Sons, Inc. (Commission decision, August 29, 2006)
Hosea O. Weaver & Sons, Inc. (FMSHRC SE 2005-301-M, et al.): Premature interlocutory petition dismissed
Apply this precedent to your situation
This is citable Commission precedent from 2006, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.
Plain-English summary
Hosea O. Weaver & Sons sought Commission review of an ALJ ruling that MSHA had jurisdiction over the disputed activities. The ruling was not a final decision, and Weaver also asked the judge to certify the jurisdiction question for interlocutory review. Weaver filed its Commission petition before the judge ruled on that certification request. Because the interlocutory petition was premature under Commission Rule 76, the Commission granted the Secretary's motion to dismiss it.
Decision snapshot
- Governing provisions: 29 C.F.R. §§ 2700.70(a) and 2700.76(a)(1); 30 U.S.C. § 823(d)(2)(A)(i)
- Outcome: Weaver's petition for review was dismissed as premature.
- Key point: A party seeking interlocutory review must wait for the judge to certify the ruling or deny certification before petitioning the Commission.
Full text (FMSHRC public release)
Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission
FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION
601 NEW JERSEY AVENUE, NW
SUITE 9500
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20001
August 29, 2006
SECRETARY OF LABOR,
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH
ADMINISTRATION (MSHA)
v.
HOSEA O. WEAVER & SONS, INC.
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
Docket Nos. SE 2005-301-M
SE 2006-131-M
SE 2006-167-M
ORDER
On August 11, 2006, the Commission received from Hosea O. Weaver & Sons, Inc. (“Weaver”) a Petition for Discretionary Review, or in the Alternative, Petition for Interlocutory Review, in these consolidated proceedings. This petition sought review of Commission Administrative Law Judge David F. Barbour’s July 13, 2006 order denying Weaver’s motion for summary decision and granting the Secretary of Labor’s motion for summary decision on the issue of whether the Department of Labor’s Mine Safety and Health Administration (“MSHA”) had jurisdiction over the activities in question. On August 15, 2006, the Secretary of Labor filed a response opposing Weaver’s petition and moving that it be dismissed.
Also on August 11, 2006, Weaver filed with Judge Barbour a motion for certification of his interlocutory ruling to the Commission, pursuant to Commission Rule 76(a)(1)(i). The judge denied Weaver’s motion on August 17, 2006.
Under the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977, 30 U.S.C. § 801 et seq. (2004), and the Commission’s procedural rules, relief from a judge’s final decision may be sought by filing a petition for review within 30 days of its issuance. 30 U.S.C. § 823(d)(2)(A)(i); 20 C.F.R.
§ 2700.70(a). Here, however, the judge’s order was an interlocutory ruling on motions filed by the parties, not a final disposition of the proceedings. Thus, we cannot consider Weaver’s petition under Commission Procedural Rule 70(a).
The Commission’s rule on interlocutory review sets forth the prerequisites for such review, stating that the Commission may grant interlocutory review only after a judge “has certified . . . that his interlocutory ruling involves a controlling question of law and that in his opinion immediate review will materially advance the final disposition of the proceeding,” or “denied a party’s motion for [such] certification . . . and the party files with the Commission a petition for interlocutory review within 30 days of the Judge’s denial of such motion.” 29 C.F.R.
§ 2700.76(a)(1). Here, Weaver filed its petition for interlocutory review prematurely because the judge had not yet ruled on the company’s pending motion for certification.
Accordingly, we grant the Secretary’s August 15 motion to dismiss.
Michael F. Duffy, Chairman
Mary Lu Jordan, Commissioner
Stanley C. Suboleski, Commissioner
Michael G. Young, Commissioner
Distribution
Adele L. Abrams, Esq
Law Office of Adele L. Abrams, P.C
4740 Corridor Place, Suite D
Beltsville, MD 20705
Jack Powasnik, Esq.
Office of the Solicitor
U.S. Department of Labor
1100 Wilson Blvd., 22nd Floor West
Arlington, VA 22209-2247
Administrative Law Judge David F. Barbour
Federal Mine Safety & Health Review Commission
Office of Administrative Law Judges
601 New Jersey Avenue, N.W., Suite 9500
Washington, D.C. 20001-2021
Does this precedent still control your case?
Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and applies it to your situation with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace