Wake Stone Corp. (ALJ decision, May 11, 2005)

Wake Stone Corp. (FMSHRC SE 2004-185-M): $60 penalty set after parties' stipulation

Decision type
ALJ decision
Docket
SE 2004-185-M
Decided
May 11, 2005
Presiding judge
Outcome
Settled
Precedential status
Final order, not precedent
Checked against source
2026-08-09

Apply this to your situation

This order from 2005 bound only the parties to this case; it isn't precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent say, with citations.

Currency note: this decision dates from 2005
The MSHA standards may have been amended, penalty amounts have been adjusted, and later Commission or court decisions may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current compliance advice. Verify the current standard before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or penalty mentioned here.
Final order, not Commission precedent
This decision by a FMSHRC Administrative Law Judge became the final decision of the Commission 40 days after issuance because the Commission did not direct review (30 U.S.C. § 823(d)(1)). It binds the parties but is not binding on the Commission in other cases. The full text below is from the official FMSHRC release.
About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official FMSHRC release. The full text is the agency's own release.
Read the official release (fmshrc.gov)

Plain-English summary

After an earlier Commission decision, the parties submitted an amended joint stipulation addressing the statutory penalty factors for Wake Stone's violation. They agreed that the operator was large, moderately negligent, promptly compliant, and affected by a moderate, non-serious violation, with no effect on its ability to remain in business. Judge Avram Weisberger found that a $60 penalty was appropriate for the violation and ordered payment within 30 days.

Decision snapshot

  • Cited standard: 30 C.F.R. § 56.171.32(a)
  • Outcome: The stipulated $60 penalty was approved and ordered paid within 30 days.
  • Key point: A joint stipulation addressing the section 110(i) penalty factors supported a $60 penalty after the earlier Commission decision.

Full text (FMSHRC public release)

FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION

OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGES

601 New Jersey Avenue, NW, Suite 9500

Washington, DC 20001

May 11, 2005

SECRETARY OF LABOR,
: CIVIL PENALTY PROCEEDING
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH :
ADMINISTRATION (MSHA), : Docket No. SE 2004-185-M Petitioner : A.C. No. 31-02071-26994
v. :
:
WAKE STONE CORP.,
:
Respondent. : Nash County Quarry

DECISION

Before:
Judge Weisberger

Pursuant to the Commission's Decision in this matter issued March 23, 2005, the parties were directed to confer and attempt to reach an agreement with regard to the factors set forth in Section 110(i) of the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977.

In compliance with this directive, on April 21, 2005, the parties filed an Amended Joint Stipulation setting forth their agreement as follows: (1) The character of the history of previous violations is normal or below for a company of this size. (2) The $60 penalty is appropriate to the size, which is large, of the business of the operator charged. (3) Under 110(i), the operator was negligent to a moderate degree. (4) The effect on the operator's ability to continue in business is not affected. (5) The gravity of the violation is of a moderate and non-serious level. (6) The operator demonstrated good faith in achieving rapid compliance after notification of the violation.

Based on the parties stipulations regarding the factors set forth in Section 110(i) of the Act, and considering the record in this case, including the facts asserted in the citation that are not disputed, I find that a penalty of $60 is appropriate for the violation of 30 C.F.R. § 56,171.32(a).

It is Ordered that Respondent pay a civil penalty $60 within 30 days of this Decision.

Avram Weisberger

Administrative Law Judge

Distribution:

Melody S. Wesson, Conference & Litigation Representative, U.S. Department of Labor, MSHA, 135 Gemini Circle, Suite 212, Birmingham, AL 35209

Roland Massey, Safety & Health Director, Wake Stone Corporation, P.O. Box 190, Knightdale, NC 27545

/sb

What applies to your situation today?

This order bound one employer. Ezel checks the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent against your facts, with citations.

Try Ezel Pro free for 7 days. Cancel anytime before the trial ends and you pay nothing.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace