Wake Stone Corp. (ALJ decision, May 11, 2005)
Wake Stone Corp. (FMSHRC SE 2004-185-M): $60 penalty set after parties' stipulation
Apply this to your situation
This order from 2005 bound only the parties to this case; it isn't precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
After an earlier Commission decision, the parties submitted an amended joint stipulation addressing the statutory penalty factors for Wake Stone's violation. They agreed that the operator was large, moderately negligent, promptly compliant, and affected by a moderate, non-serious violation, with no effect on its ability to remain in business. Judge Avram Weisberger found that a $60 penalty was appropriate for the violation and ordered payment within 30 days.
Decision snapshot
- Cited standard: 30 C.F.R. § 56.171.32(a)
- Outcome: The stipulated $60 penalty was approved and ordered paid within 30 days.
- Key point: A joint stipulation addressing the section 110(i) penalty factors supported a $60 penalty after the earlier Commission decision.
Full text (FMSHRC public release)
FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION
OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGES
601 New Jersey Avenue, NW, Suite 9500
Washington, DC 20001
May 11, 2005
SECRETARY OF LABOR,
: CIVIL PENALTY PROCEEDING
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH :
ADMINISTRATION (MSHA), : Docket No. SE 2004-185-M Petitioner : A.C. No. 31-02071-26994
v. :
:
WAKE STONE CORP.,
:
Respondent. : Nash County Quarry
DECISION
Before:
Judge Weisberger
Pursuant to the Commission's Decision in this matter issued March 23, 2005, the parties were directed to confer and attempt to reach an agreement with regard to the factors set forth in Section 110(i) of the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977.
In compliance with this directive, on April 21, 2005, the parties filed an Amended Joint Stipulation setting forth their agreement as follows: (1) The character of the history of previous violations is normal or below for a company of this size. (2) The $60 penalty is appropriate to the size, which is large, of the business of the operator charged. (3) Under 110(i), the operator was negligent to a moderate degree. (4) The effect on the operator's ability to continue in business is not affected. (5) The gravity of the violation is of a moderate and non-serious level. (6) The operator demonstrated good faith in achieving rapid compliance after notification of the violation.
Based on the parties stipulations regarding the factors set forth in Section 110(i) of the Act, and considering the record in this case, including the facts asserted in the citation that are not disputed, I find that a penalty of $60 is appropriate for the violation of 30 C.F.R. § 56,171.32(a).
It is Ordered that Respondent pay a civil penalty $60 within 30 days of this Decision.
Avram Weisberger
Administrative Law Judge
Distribution:
Melody S. Wesson, Conference & Litigation Representative, U.S. Department of Labor, MSHA, 135 Gemini Circle, Suite 212, Birmingham, AL 35209
Roland Massey, Safety & Health Director, Wake Stone Corporation, P.O. Box 190, Knightdale, NC 27545
/sb
What applies to your situation today?
This order bound one employer. Ezel checks the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent against your facts, with citations.
Try Ezel Pro free for 7 days. Cancel anytime before the trial ends and you pay nothing.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace