Clayton Chemical Acquisition, L.L.C. d/b/a Resource Recovery Group, L.L.C. (Board decision, April 28, 1998)
In re Clayton Chemical Acquisition, L.L.C. (EAB RCRA Appeal No. 98-1): appeal dismissed for lack of jurisdiction
Apply this precedent to your situation
This is citable Board precedent from 1998, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.
Plain-English summary
Clayton Chemical Acquisition, L.L.C., doing business as Resource Recovery Group, L.L.C., and EPA Region 5 jointly asked the Environmental Appeals Board to dismiss the company's petition for review. They agreed that the appeal raised no federally appealable issues and therefore was outside the Board's jurisdiction. The Board granted the joint motion and dismissed RCRA Appeal No. 98-1 with prejudice in its entirety.
Decision snapshot
- Cited authorities: None stated in the decision.
- Outcome: Appeal dismissed with prejudice for lack of jurisdiction.
- Key point: The EAB cannot review an appeal that raises no federally appealable issue.
Full text (EPA EAB public release)
BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENTAL APPEALS BOARD
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY WASHINGTON, D.C.
)
In re: )
)
Clayton Chemical Acquisition, L.L.C. ) RCRA Appeal No. 98-1 d/b/a Resource Recovery Group, L.L.C. ) )
)
ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL
Petitioner Clayton Chemical Acquisition, L.L.C. d/b/a
Resource Recovery Group, L.L.C. ("RRG") and U.S. EPA Region 5
have jointly moved the Environmental Appeals Board to dismiss the
above-captioned petition for review for lack of jurisdiction.
Specifically, the movants jointly represent that:
U.S. EPA and RRG agree that the appeal submitted by RRG on February 27, 1998, should be dismissed because the appeal does not raise any federally appealable issues and therefore the Environmental Appeals Board * * * lacks jurisdiction to review the appeal.
Joint Motion to Dismiss at 1.
Given RRG’s acknowledgment that the Board lacks jurisdiction
over this matter, the Board hereby grants the parties’ joint motion to dismiss. RCRA Appeal No. 98-1 is, accordingly,
dismissed with prejudice in its entirety.
So ordered.
ENVIRONMENTAL APPEALS BOARD
By: /s/
Ronald L. McCallum
Environmental Appeals Judge
Dated: 4/28/98
2
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that, on the date indicated below, copies of the foregoing Order Dismissing Appeal in the matter of Clayton Chemical Acquisition, L.L.C. d/b/a Resource Recovery Group, L.L.C., RCRA Appeal No. 98-1, were sent to the following persons in the manner indicated:
By first-class mail: Brad J. Beeson, Esq.
Assistant Regional Counsel
U.S. EPA, Region 5
Mail Code C-14J
77 W. Jackson Boulevard
Chicago, IL 60604
Sheldon D. Korlin, Esq.
P.O. Box 7052
Chesterfield, MO 63006
Mary Gade, Director
Illinois Environmental Protection
Agency
1021 North Grand Avenue East
Springfield, IL 62794
/s/
Annette Duncan
Secretary
Dated: 4/28/98
Does this precedent still control your case?
Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and applies it to your situation with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace